[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Randolph Morris? why did isiah sign him?
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/2/2008  6:57 AM
The dude is going to be a unrestricted free agent after this year.....what would keep him here? Somebody is gonna give him a shot......when will Isiah give him his?
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/2/2008  7:00 AM
why would he wanna stay? he can't get any playing time here... if any other team is willing to give him a contract & some minutes, i see him going elsewhere.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/2/2008  8:31 AM
isiah signed him so I could say he was going to gamble with our first round pick since he 'already had a first round pick'

Thus Chandler, who also can't get burn.

isiah signed him because he can't help himself, in terms of trying to get every last talented player he can.
Queeniepop
Posts: 20640
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/29/2006
Member: #1233

1/2/2008  9:03 AM
The problem I have with Zeke and young players like Randy Morris, Wilson Chandler, Collins and to an extent, Balkman is that he lets them ROT on the bench. We honestly dont know if any can help the team. Like with Chandler and Morris, both play positions that are highly suspect on the team (SF and C).

Morris has 6 fouls to give the team. Just tell him to prevent anyone that gets in the lane from making a layup, even if he fouls out in 6 mins.

With Wilson, he is long and athletic...tell him to stay in front of his man and help on D...take the open shot b/c he has a better chance of hitting it than Balkman or Jeffries and he may shoot better than Q.

Use Mardy to take Nate or JC off the ball and pass, DON'T SHOOT and have him play pressure D and help.

Why not set up backdoor cuts for Balkman and hit him up with an oop so he can throw it down for a high percentage shot. Instead of being open in the corner for an open jump shot, tell him to run the baseline and hit him up with the pass. No one is guarding him.

MOREOVER, by putting them ALL in situations in the game that they can be somewhat useful, they may show something. Also, by playing them a bit in ways they can be successful, they gain confidence. They may get better and most importantly, increase their value, either for our team or if we move a guy like Zach or another contract with one of them. At least the team that we trade with can get something more than cheap labor or a throw-in.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/2/2008  9:19 AM
Posted by Queeniepop:

The problem I have with Zeke and young players like Randy Morris, Wilson Chandler, Collins and to an extent, Balkman is that he lets them ROT on the bench. We honestly dont know if any can help the team. Like with Chandler and Morris, both play positions that are highly suspect on the team (SF and C).

i almost think a starting 5 of Collins, Jamal, Chandler, Balkman & Morris could have gotten this team better than 8 wins by now.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
1/2/2008  9:19 AM
He needs to play this guy. He has talent and he's NBA ready from a physical standpont so he needs to get out there.

Isiah needs to realize this year is over. He obviously has some degree of job security, so instead of losing with the other guys he needs to start playing the kids.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
1/2/2008  9:50 AM
i just figured it out...isiah is drafting guys so we can dominate summer leagues...
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/2/2008  9:57 AM
Why you try to find a system in the reasoning of the madman?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

1/2/2008  10:02 AM
This just got me remembering the LB era when people couldn't wait for isiah to be allowed to coach because, his fans told us, he'd surely play his rookies, unlike the senile old goat.

I hope nobody minds if I recycle and old post;
Posted by BlueSeats:

1) if we sat Marbury, Q, Crawford, Curry, etc, and won 23 games with the rookies people would be killing Larry for benching our "best" players.

2) isiah and dolan would be up in arms that Larry was wasting their 125M roster.

3) this NYC scrutiny and pressure is not good for rookies. It's simply not wise to make THEM try to carry us to the playoffs, which certainly was the directive.

4) creeps like Marbury, Francis and Mo were whining enough as it was; can you imagine if they were all benched for kids? talk about a mutiny!!!

5) two rookies ranked 4th and 5th in total minutes in a season without a draft pick. The were edged out only by Marbury, Crawford and Curry. The year prior, when draft positioning mattered and the coaches were dominated by Isiah, the top 5 were all veterans.

Just accept that this team was not constructed to feature rookies last year. It was constructed for guys like Marbury, crawford, Q, AD, M. Rose, and James to carry the team while the rookies learned the ropes and increased their role as the year wore on.

The problem was that the veterans came into camp out of shape and with their egos up their butts and they slacked themselves into deficits they couldn't pull themselves out of. The rookies got cast into situations they weren't prepared for, and shouldn't have been expected to shoulder. But the veterans provided zero positive leadership, and then had the gall to get b/tchy when their heads and hearts got called into question. They let themselves be shown up and embarrassed NBDL refuges, and rookies.

Everyone says Brown should have established roles. He did, the veterans were assigned to start and be the leaders.

THEY FAILED HIM.

Marbury, Q, AD, Curry.

Which of them best fulfilled their role?

Marbury, the guard brown gave more freedom to than any other but who could never quit get any system that didn't entail him freelancing to his heart's content?

Q, who entered the season with a bad back and ankle befor ehis brother was murdered?

AD, who got suspended just when we got cooking?

Curry, who's "condition" justified him being out of condition?

What about Jerome James, our other "starting" center? The guy who halfway thru the season he was still begging out after 5 minutes of play?

But if Brown actually gave up on those 125M veterans- who isiah, dolan and so many fans had invested so much hope and expectations in - where would that leave us? People say that Brown killed everyones trade value. Well what would having guys like Marbury and Curry playing BEHIND Nate and Butler do to their trade value?

4 potential lottery picks were given up for just those two, but they should play behind the 5'7 21st pick and a 6'8 undrafted NBDL center?

So what did Larry do? He kept the expectations on the veterans to show leadership and to bear the pressure of the season while still allowing the opportunity for the kids to grow. Nobody got a free ride and nobody got shut out. There was a leadership vacuum that anybody was allowed to fill.

Who did best fill the leadership vacuum? Probably Malik, QR, Crawford, and Frye. (You can add Nate for his work on the floor but off the floor leaves questions. And Lee is still an unknown but shows promise.)

Don't like 'em as leaders? Is that Brown's fault, or Isiah's?

Please don't expect a poor rookie to have to unseat the Grand Negative: Mr Starbury. Remember: "he's the second most important person in the organization after dolan. And he's not in play and he'll never be in play. We don't get down like that!!!"

But what if we get him and his ilk out of here and see what some positive people can do?

Some of you guys are so afraid of what Brown will do to the roster - like that he wants all aged veterans. Have you really convinced yourselves that he wants to trade Nate, Butler, Frye, Lee, Crawford, etc so he can add cripple braindeads to add to Marbury, Francis, Jalen, and Jerome?

Just get rid of the poisons and let the guys who can lead lead and have the others get out of the damn way. Our problem wasn't that brown didn't establish roles or that the kids didn't get enough time, it was that the veterans failed in their roles, and that put all of the coach, management and the rookies in extremely difficult and awkward positions.


That was two seasons ago and we're still dealing with the same issues of a clogged roster of ill-performing veterans, a GM trying to save face, and a "win now" M.O. that puts a lot of pressure that developing kids shouldn't have to bear.

That said, I'd love to see the guys get some minutes, I just wish this were a better environment for player development.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/2/2008  10:14 AM
Hey gang, just stopping by for a sec. i've been out of town on business. Sorry to see the team hasn't improved one bit.

As for Morris, I believed Isiah when he said this team was about the future and that he believed in his young players. I thought he showed some signs of being more willing to play the young guys last year. Perhaps that was a different Isiah. It seems this year he's been taking a different approach to the team. He's been fiercly sticking to the older guys who haven't done jack. I can't say that I trust him anymore.

I was wrong about this guy and i'm sorry to say that I actually believed we would see a different approach than LB took with the team. Why shouldn't we have believed Isiah? He's the one that kept bringing in all these young players. He didn't trade them but stuck with them, so it seemed logical to believe he liked his own players and would use them. I have no answers for this guys actions.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/2/2008  10:17 AM
Posted by BlueSeats:

This just got me remembering the LB era when people couldn't wait for isiah to be allowed to coach because, his fans told us, he'd surely play his rookies, unlike the senile old goat.

i was definitely one of those guys cuz i said if anyone could get through to the players that Isiah acquired, it would be Isiah... i've since learned that trying to make any sense of Isiah's roster & rotation decisions is an exercise in futility.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/2/2008  10:21 AM
Posted by nixluva:

Hey gang, just stopping by for a sec. i've been out of town on business. Sorry to see the team hasn't improved one bit.

As for Morris, I believed Isiah when he said this team was about the future and that he believed in his young players. I thought he showed some signs of being more willing to play the young guys last year. Perhaps that was a different Isiah. It seems this year he's been taking a different approach to the team. He's been fiercly sticking to the older guys who haven't done jack. I can't say that I trust him anymore.

I was wrong about this guy and i'm sorry to say that I actually believed we would see a different approach than LB took with the team. Why shouldn't we have believed Isiah? He's the one that kept bringing in all these young players. He didn't trade them but stuck with them, so it seemed logical to believe he liked his own players and would use them. I have no answers for this guys actions.

nix - here is the answer for Isiah's actions: he is a horrible GM who runs his team like a fantasy league team, where he goes out and gets the most talented guys available- but often, the most talented guys available usually are flawed, because good players tend to be kept on their own team.

Isiah the coach can't play the younger guys, because Isiah the GM brought in a bunch of overpaid vets, and both Isiah the GM & Isiah the coach are worried they're getting fired, and since Isiah is from the whatever side of chicago, he is a fighter and will do anything to survive.

only isiah is like a drowning victim who is panicked and thus, unable to keep his cool and is making his situation worse than it was.
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/2/2008  10:23 AM
Posted by TheGame:

[quote]
i almost think a starting 5 of Collins, Jamal, Chandler, Balkman & Morris could have gotten this team better than 8 wins by now.

I agree. That team at least could play defense. Replace Balkman with Lee. Morris looks to have a decent lowpost game and can play decent defense. Jamal would have to carry the offense, but Chandler and Lee can also score. Bring Balkman and Nate off the bench for energy and offense punch (mostly Nate), and I really believe that team would have 8-10 wins by now and probably would be improving with each game. IT needs to just sit Curry and Q. Marbury and Randolph should be coming off the bench. We do this, the team will win more games.



Trust the Process
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
1/2/2008  10:30 AM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by nixluva:

Hey gang, just stopping by for a sec. i've been out of town on business. Sorry to see the team hasn't improved one bit.

As for Morris, I believed Isiah when he said this team was about the future and that he believed in his young players. I thought he showed some signs of being more willing to play the young guys last year. Perhaps that was a different Isiah. It seems this year he's been taking a different approach to the team. He's been fiercly sticking to the older guys who haven't done jack. I can't say that I trust him anymore.

I was wrong about this guy and i'm sorry to say that I actually believed we would see a different approach than LB took with the team. Why shouldn't we have believed Isiah? He's the one that kept bringing in all these young players. He didn't trade them but stuck with them, so it seemed logical to believe he liked his own players and would use them. I have no answers for this guys actions.

nix - here is the answer for Isiah's actions: he is a horrible GM who runs his team like a fantasy league team, where he goes out and gets the most talented guys available- but often, the most talented guys available usually are flawed, because good players tend to be kept on their own team.

Isiah the coach can't play the younger guys, because Isiah the GM brought in a bunch of overpaid vets, and both Isiah the GM & Isiah the coach are worried they're getting fired, and since Isiah is from the whatever side of chicago, he is a fighter and will do anything to survive.

only isiah is like a drowning victim who is panicked and thus, unable to keep his cool and is making his situation worse than it was.

Exactly. IT needs to stop worrying about being fired and just clean house. Trade Curry (who still has some value) for a prospect and a first round pick. Start Morris and see what he can do. He did not look like a bad center during the summer league. If you can trade Marbury for an expiring contract, do it. We cannot trade Q due to his injury, but I would diminish his role. I would start Crawford, Chandler, Balkman, Lee, and Morris. I would bring Marbury, Collins, Nate, Q, and Zach off the bench. We are still going to lose games, but at least, we would see what Chandler, Balkman, Collins, Nate, and Morris can do with big minutes. I think there are 4-6 players on this team who can be part of a championship team and we need to identify them now so that we can start to rebuild in a way that makes sense.
Trust the Process
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
1/2/2008  12:25 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by franco12:
Posted by nixluva:

Hey gang, just stopping by for a sec. i've been out of town on business. Sorry to see the team hasn't improved one bit.

As for Morris, I believed Isiah when he said this team was about the future and that he believed in his young players. I thought he showed some signs of being more willing to play the young guys last year. Perhaps that was a different Isiah. It seems this year he's been taking a different approach to the team. He's been fiercly sticking to the older guys who haven't done jack. I can't say that I trust him anymore.

I was wrong about this guy and i'm sorry to say that I actually believed we would see a different approach than LB took with the team. Why shouldn't we have believed Isiah? He's the one that kept bringing in all these young players. He didn't trade them but stuck with them, so it seemed logical to believe he liked his own players and would use them. I have no answers for this guys actions.

nix - here is the answer for Isiah's actions: he is a horrible GM who runs his team like a fantasy league team, where he goes out and gets the most talented guys available- but often, the most talented guys available usually are flawed, because good players tend to be kept on their own team.

Isiah the coach can't play the younger guys, because Isiah the GM brought in a bunch of overpaid vets, and both Isiah the GM & Isiah the coach are worried they're getting fired, and since Isiah is from the whatever side of chicago, he is a fighter and will do anything to survive.

only isiah is like a drowning victim who is panicked and thus, unable to keep his cool and is making his situation worse than it was.

Exactly. IT needs to stop worrying about being fired and just clean house. Trade Curry (who still has some value) for a prospect and a first round pick. Start Morris and see what he can do. He did not look like a bad center during the summer league. If you can trade Marbury for an expiring contract, do it. We cannot trade Q due to his injury, but I would diminish his role. I would start Crawford, Chandler, Balkman, Lee, and Morris. I would bring Marbury, Collins, Nate, Q, and Zach off the bench. We are still going to lose games, but at least, we would see what Chandler, Balkman, Collins, Nate, and Morris can do with big minutes. I think there are 4-6 players on this team who can be part of a championship team and we need to identify them now so that we can start to rebuild in a way that makes sense.

This is all so true.
But you forget the step one - fire Isiah.
Non of this can happened if he is GM/coach.




"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/2/2008  12:36 PM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by franco12:
Posted by nixluva:

Hey gang, just stopping by for a sec. i've been out of town on business. Sorry to see the team hasn't improved one bit.

As for Morris, I believed Isiah when he said this team was about the future and that he believed in his young players. I thought he showed some signs of being more willing to play the young guys last year. Perhaps that was a different Isiah. It seems this year he's been taking a different approach to the team. He's been fiercly sticking to the older guys who haven't done jack. I can't say that I trust him anymore.

I was wrong about this guy and i'm sorry to say that I actually believed we would see a different approach than LB took with the team. Why shouldn't we have believed Isiah? He's the one that kept bringing in all these young players. He didn't trade them but stuck with them, so it seemed logical to believe he liked his own players and would use them. I have no answers for this guys actions.

nix - here is the answer for Isiah's actions: he is a horrible GM who runs his team like a fantasy league team, where he goes out and gets the most talented guys available- but often, the most talented guys available usually are flawed, because good players tend to be kept on their own team.

Isiah the coach can't play the younger guys, because Isiah the GM brought in a bunch of overpaid vets, and both Isiah the GM & Isiah the coach are worried they're getting fired, and since Isiah is from the whatever side of chicago, he is a fighter and will do anything to survive.

only isiah is like a drowning victim who is panicked and thus, unable to keep his cool and is making his situation worse than it was.

Exactly. IT needs to stop worrying about being fired and just clean house. Trade Curry (who still has some value) for a prospect and a first round pick. Start Morris and see what he can do. He did not look like a bad center during the summer league. If you can trade Marbury for an expiring contract, do it. We cannot trade Q due to his injury, but I would diminish his role. I would start Crawford, Chandler, Balkman, Lee, and Morris. I would bring Marbury, Collins, Nate, Q, and Zach off the bench. We are still going to lose games, but at least, we would see what Chandler, Balkman, Collins, Nate, and Morris can do with big minutes. I think there are 4-6 players on this team who can be part of a championship team and we need to identify them now so that we can start to rebuild in a way that makes sense.

This is all so true.
But you forget the step one - fire Isiah.
Non of this can happened if he is GM/coach.


exactly- how can isiah at this point trade any of the guys that aren't working out when he brought them all in himself.

if the ingredients aren't mixing at this point, its time to fire chef!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

1/2/2008  12:37 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Hey gang, just stopping by for a sec. i've been out of town on business. Sorry to see the team hasn't improved one bit.

As for Morris, I believed Isiah when he said this team was about the future and that he believed in his young players. I thought he showed some signs of being more willing to play the young guys last year. Perhaps that was a different Isiah. It seems this year he's been taking a different approach to the team. He's been fiercly sticking to the older guys who haven't done jack. I can't say that I trust him anymore.

I was wrong about this guy and i'm sorry to say that I actually believed we would see a different approach than LB took with the team. Why shouldn't we have believed Isiah? He's the one that kept bringing in all these young players. He didn't trade them but stuck with them, so it seemed logical to believe he liked his own players and would use them. I have no answers for this guys actions.


Better question? Why should we have beieved anything coming out of his mouth or him sticking to a plan? He's been a consumate professional Devious Pathelogical Liar his whole tenure here. You may have believed him but you were in the minority luva.



[Edited by - TrueBlue on 01-02-2008 11:39 AM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/2/2008  12:38 PM
Blueseats, you were dead on then, and you are dead on now..... good find..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
1/2/2008  5:46 PM
Why does isiah do anything, his decisions are the worst, its like nate robinson in his rookie year, awful decision making, awful play calling, awful subsitution, awful line up changes.
ES
Randolph Morris? why did isiah sign him?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy