[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Was Zach really a good trade?
Author Thread
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/11/2007  10:10 AM
Not saying Zach is a bad player. Is he bad for Knicks yes. Curry and Lee last year averaged 30.2 points and 17.4 rebounds. They did this on 18 shots. Zach and Curry are averaging 32.2 points and 15.5 rebounds on 27 shots. We are paying 13 million dollars for 2 extra points per game and 10 extra shots. Just think if we would have spent that money on a perimeter player.
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/11/2007  10:12 AM
it becomes a great trade as soon as Isiah is forced out, and the new GM turns either Curry or Zach into a better fitting/cheaper/younger part.
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/11/2007  10:15 AM
The thing is Lee is the only trading chip you have on this entire team.
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

12/11/2007  10:18 AM
Zach was a good trade if we had a coach that did not put he and curry in the starting lineup and on the court at the same time.
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
12/11/2007  10:26 AM
no it was a horrible trade.

Is zach worth 16 and 17 million in 2009-2010 no. Are we one of the worst teams in the nba, yes. So how is it an effective trade
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/11/2007  10:27 AM
No, Zach wasn't a good trade. And for anyone who thinks he actually has value, just look at what we got him for.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TheGame
Posts: 26658
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
12/11/2007  10:30 AM
The only thing I really like about Zach is that he is not afraid to put a team on his back and try to lead them to a victory. You need guys who can step up when the pressure is on. The problem is that he and Curry just don't work defensively. I still believe that if we had better players from 1-3, the Randolph/Curry frontcourt could survive, but we have too many holes at other spots to cover up Randolph and Curry's weaknesses.

Overall, it is a good trade because I still believe Randolph has more trade value than Frye. A team like the Bulls, Bobcats, or Heat could use his scoring ability and would probably be willing to take on his salary in the right deal.
Trust the Process
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/11/2007  10:33 AM
Posted by franco12:

it becomes a great trade as soon as Isiah is forced out, and the new GM turns either Curry or Zach into a better fitting/cheaper/younger part.
Good offensive players make players around them better. Zach and Eddy bring out the worst in their teammates instead. Trading one of them won't change that. Ask the Trail Blazers if they want Zach back and I bet they'll say "hell no." Ask the other 28 GMs if they regret not beating the Knicks' offer for Zach and I bet they'll also say "hell no"
Silverfuel
Posts: 31751
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
12/11/2007  10:35 AM
i was thinking this same thing. bad trade. I have lost all faith in this management and I am an optimist.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
martin
Posts: 81053
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/11/2007  10:35 AM
Posted by franco12:

it becomes a great trade as soon as Isiah is forced out, and the new GM turns either Curry or Zach into a better fitting/cheaper/younger part.

yo, this is a knicks website where grammar matters: "a better fitting/cheaper/youthier part"
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/11/2007  2:51 PM
You're getting to the point where Marbs might be the most tradable player. Next year he will be.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/11/2007  4:45 PM
The trade was fine, since it alone wasn't going to be the answer to all of our problems anyway. It was one move to improve one position and clear out a logjam at guard. Isiah wasn't going to get anyone else with what we had to offer. I still think it was a good trade. The problems this team is having right now aren't just about Zach and Curry not working together. It's about Isiah not really being able to find the right style of play for this team.

Jones is one of the only guys that seems to get it. He penetrates when the time is right and shoots when the defense leaves him open. He will pass the ball and keep it moving as it should, but from what i've seen recently it doesn't appear that Isiah is looking to force defenses to adjust to us. He's letting them dictate the action.

All he keeps doing is running the same plays when Zach or Curry are in there and teams have decided that they'll double hard on our post ups. So the obvious answer is to attack with penetration and passing in order to force the D to adjust and this would create more open looks for Zach and Curry. When ever we actually did that the plays worked, but there's no commitment to that kind of attack. No consistent pick and roll or Curl plays. No consistent spreading of the floor so that Curry and Zach can make a good pass out of the post. OFten the perimeter players don't present them selves so that a clean pass can be made. Curry has been actually looking to pass, IMO too much, but the guads aren't coming to the ball or moving into the open space to receive the pass.

The team looks lost on D and again I think it's coaching. There's no reason why we can't have a defense that will more aggressively double a teams top threat when they put the ball on the floor. We have our guys just chasing and no one is seeing their man and the ball. So it's easy to make the pass to the open man against us. I'm just seeing sloppy execution all over the place and to me that's more about coaching than anything. If you're like Avery Johnson and you demand precision or like Sloan, you're teams will never look like the Knicks have looked.

BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/11/2007  4:47 PM
Posted by nixluva:

The trade was fine, since it alone wasn't going to be the answer to all of our problems anyway. It was one move to improve one position and clear out a logjam at guard. Isiah wasn't going to get anyone else with what we had to offer. I still think it was a good trade. The problems this team is having right now aren't just about Zach and Curry not working together. It's about Isiah not really being able to find the right style of play for this team.

Jones is one of the only guys that seems to get it. He penetrates when the time is right and shoots when the defense leaves him open. He will pass the ball and keep it moving as it should, but from what i've seen recently it doesn't appear that Isiah is looking to force defenses to adjust to us. He's letting them dictate the action.

All he keeps doing is running the same plays when Zach or Curry are in there and teams have decided that they'll double hard on our post ups. So the obvious answer is to attack with penetration and passing in order to force the D to adjust and this would create more open looks for Zach and Curry. When ever we actually did that the plays worked, but there's no commitment to that kind of attack. No consistent pick and roll or Curl plays. No consistent spreading of the floor so that Curry and Zach can make a good pass out of the post. OFten the perimeter players don't present them selves so that a clean pass can be made. Curry has been actually looking to pass, IMO too much, but the guads aren't coming to the ball or moving into the open space to receive the pass.

The team looks lost on D and again I think it's coaching. There's no reason why we can't have a defense that will more aggressively double a teams top threat when they put the ball on the floor. We have our guys just chasing and no one is seeing their man and the ball. So it's easy to make the pass to the open man against us. I'm just seeing sloppy execution all over the place and to me that's more about coaching than anything. If you're like Avery Johnson and you demand precision or like Sloan, you're teams will never look like the Knicks have looked.

Do you think there's any chance we might get a new coach anytime soon?
https:// It's not so hard.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
12/11/2007  5:08 PM
the trade made the team more redundant and defensively porous. and it took time away from our most effective player: DLee.

not a good move. it also further screwed our cap situation.
¿ △ ?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
12/11/2007  6:27 PM
it was a HORRIBLE TRADE before the season even began & nothing's changed... i don't care what we gave up to get him, he doesn't fit on this roster & in fact the team has become even worse than they were last year if you can possibly even imagine that happening... this franchise is going to end up paying an extra $65 million dollars when you factor in the luxury tax for a player that has had no appreciable positive effect on the current roster, pretty much par for the course when you factor in all the other major signings & trade acquisitions that Isiah's made over his tenure.

who cares if we got ourselves a 17 & 10 player who doesn't play any D when we stink even worse than we did last year... hell, D Lee can get you 14 & 10 without playing any defense if you play him enough minutes, & you wouldn't have the situation where Curry would be getting phased out of the offense during some stretches of the game either because Lee gets most of his points off transition baskets & offensive putbacks... only a blind or clueless fan couldn't have predicted Curry's game would suffer once Zach came into the fold.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
12/11/2007  6:44 PM
Did you see IT's comment on the rumored Rose showcasing from the 76ers game?

He said, "No, we haven't discussed that at all, we're happy with what we have."

Dude? You've been down by 20+ in 8 games already this year. Unreal.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/11/2007  8:02 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by nixluva:

The trade was fine, since it alone wasn't going to be the answer to all of our problems anyway. It was one move to improve one position and clear out a logjam at guard. Isiah wasn't going to get anyone else with what we had to offer. I still think it was a good trade. The problems this team is having right now aren't just about Zach and Curry not working together. It's about Isiah not really being able to find the right style of play for this team.

Jones is one of the only guys that seems to get it. He penetrates when the time is right and shoots when the defense leaves him open. He will pass the ball and keep it moving as it should, but from what i've seen recently it doesn't appear that Isiah is looking to force defenses to adjust to us. He's letting them dictate the action.

All he keeps doing is running the same plays when Zach or Curry are in there and teams have decided that they'll double hard on our post ups. So the obvious answer is to attack with penetration and passing in order to force the D to adjust and this would create more open looks for Zach and Curry. When ever we actually did that the plays worked, but there's no commitment to that kind of attack. No consistent pick and roll or Curl plays. No consistent spreading of the floor so that Curry and Zach can make a good pass out of the post. OFten the perimeter players don't present them selves so that a clean pass can be made. Curry has been actually looking to pass, IMO too much, but the guads aren't coming to the ball or moving into the open space to receive the pass.

The team looks lost on D and again I think it's coaching. There's no reason why we can't have a defense that will more aggressively double a teams top threat when they put the ball on the floor. We have our guys just chasing and no one is seeing their man and the ball. So it's easy to make the pass to the open man against us. I'm just seeing sloppy execution all over the place and to me that's more about coaching than anything. If you're like Avery Johnson and you demand precision or like Sloan, you're teams will never look like the Knicks have looked.

Do you think there's any chance we might get a new coach anytime soon?

Unfortunately Dolan is our owner and there in lies the biggest problem for this franchise. We can change coaches and GM's but since this guy is going to take an active role in decisions it's gonna be hard for us to even get a good coach to want to come here, never mind the idea that Dolan would even make a good choice to begin with.

It seems that we're stuck with Isiah and we have to hope that he somehow has an epiphany and realizes how to coach this team. I don't know if he has it in him to recognize the problems and fix them. I still believe that his original concepts for the offense were right, but now he's gone away from motion and is fixated on forcing it into Zach and Curry, despite the fact that teams are overplaying the post feeds. It's just stupid to keep banging your head against a wall like that. The answer is to just use the advantage we have at guard when it comes to breaking down a defense. We've got Jamal, Jones and Nate who can do that with ease. Then you make sure to use picks and cuts to spring the bigs open for short passes and easier scores. Isiah acts like teams don't have film on what we do. He has no deception to the offense no plan B or C.

It's easy to just say it's the players and that they stink, but a GOOD to GREAT coach would get much more out of this team than we've been seeing. That's what i'm seeing. We already knew the team was flawed, but you still should get a decent level of play even from a very flawed team, which most NBA teams actually are. How many teams are really built well? You know who they are cuz they're winning at a much higher clip.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
12/11/2007  8:10 PM
Posted by nixluva:

How many teams are really built well? You know who they are cuz they're winning at a much higher clip.

That quote right there should automatically eliminate the Knicks from you're thinking then man. I'm not trying to be a dick, but the Knicks really aren't built anywhere near well.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/11/2007  8:15 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by nixluva:

How many teams are really built well? You know who they are cuz they're winning at a much higher clip.

That quote right there should automatically eliminate the Knicks from you're thinking then man. I'm not trying to be a dick, but the Knicks really aren't built anywhere near well.
True, but then we should be able to at the least compete with other bad teams. This is about more than the teams construction. I've seen much worse rosters play some semblence of pro BB. This team has played better, so this recent stretch is about coaching. He's not having any effect on the players. Prime example is that even with Zach being a ball hog and so forth, McMillan got him to play some good ball. Scoring, Rebounding and over 2 asts a game from a PF is pretty good. Zach has devolved under Isiah. In fact all the players have gotten worse this year.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
12/11/2007  8:16 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by nixluva:

The trade was fine, since it alone wasn't going to be the answer to all of our problems anyway. It was one move to improve one position and clear out a logjam at guard. Isiah wasn't going to get anyone else with what we had to offer. I still think it was a good trade. The problems this team is having right now aren't just about Zach and Curry not working together. It's about Isiah not really being able to find the right style of play for this team.

Jones is one of the only guys that seems to get it. He penetrates when the time is right and shoots when the defense leaves him open. He will pass the ball and keep it moving as it should, but from what i've seen recently it doesn't appear that Isiah is looking to force defenses to adjust to us. He's letting them dictate the action.

All he keeps doing is running the same plays when Zach or Curry are in there and teams have decided that they'll double hard on our post ups. So the obvious answer is to attack with penetration and passing in order to force the D to adjust and this would create more open looks for Zach and Curry. When ever we actually did that the plays worked, but there's no commitment to that kind of attack. No consistent pick and roll or Curl plays. No consistent spreading of the floor so that Curry and Zach can make a good pass out of the post. OFten the perimeter players don't present them selves so that a clean pass can be made. Curry has been actually looking to pass, IMO too much, but the guads aren't coming to the ball or moving into the open space to receive the pass.

The team looks lost on D and again I think it's coaching. There's no reason why we can't have a defense that will more aggressively double a teams top threat when they put the ball on the floor. We have our guys just chasing and no one is seeing their man and the ball. So it's easy to make the pass to the open man against us. I'm just seeing sloppy execution all over the place and to me that's more about coaching than anything. If you're like Avery Johnson and you demand precision or like Sloan, you're teams will never look like the Knicks have looked.

Do you think there's any chance we might get a new coach anytime soon?

Unfortunately Dolan is our owner and there in lies the biggest problem for this franchise. We can change coaches and GM's but since this guy is going to take an active role in decisions it's gonna be hard for us to even get a good coach to want to come here, never mind the idea that Dolan would even make a good choice to begin with.

It seems that we're stuck with Isiah and we have to hope that he somehow has an epiphany and realizes how to coach this team. I don't know if he has it in him to recognize the problems and fix them. I still believe that his original concepts for the offense were right, but now he's gone away from motion and is fixated on forcing it into Zach and Curry, despite the fact that teams are overplaying the post feeds. It's just stupid to keep banging your head against a wall like that. The answer is to just use the advantage we have at guard when it comes to breaking down a defense. We've got Jamal, Jones and Nate who can do that with ease. Then you make sure to use picks and cuts to spring the bigs open for short passes and easier scores. Isiah acts like teams don't have film on what we do. He has no deception to the offense no plan B or C.

It's easy to just say it's the players and that they stink, but a GOOD to GREAT coach would get much more out of this team than we've been seeing. That's what i'm seeing. We already knew the team was flawed, but you still should get a decent level of play even from a very flawed team, which most NBA teams actually are. How many teams are really built well? You know who they are cuz they're winning at a much higher clip.

Is it the coach, or have the players sort of tuned him out? I don't get why they're worse this year than they were last year. It's the same coach and presumably a better team. You'd think the addition of Randolph would make the team better.

I don't really agree with your contention that Isiah had a good original concept, because I don't think he really had one. But leaving that aside, I think the players are theoretically good enough to have won more games. What I think happened is the coach badly miscalculated in his handling of the Marbury situation and lost his team.

Either that or he's hoping to get fired so he can walk away with an easy 25 mil.




[Edited by - basketballjones on 12-11-2007 20:17]
https:// It's not so hard.
Was Zach really a good trade?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy