[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

article on van horn & the nets
Author Thread
prodson
Posts: 20886
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/14/2003
Member: #395
Colombia
6/10/2003  12:52 PM
By Sam Smith
Special to ESPN.com


EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. -- The New Jersey Nets have a problem in this NBA Finals against the San Antonio Spurs. They can't score!

In Game 1, they got 89 points. Then it went down to 87 and 79. As progressions go, look for the Nets in Syracuse by Game 6.

"Our offense didn't work for us," Dikembe Mutombo was saying before Wednesday's Game 4. "That's the reason we lost (Game 3)."


Keith Van Horn would've been the perfect guy to bust the Spurs' zone.
That offense didn't work for several reasons. One is Richard Jefferson, who's slashing game has been eliminated by not only the permitted harder hits of playoff basketball, but a concerted effort of the Spurs' defenders, especially their big men, to get back on D. The offense didn't work because the Nets like their field goals from about an inch away. So when the Spurs stepped back into a zone from time to time, the Nets couldn't find any nets, bottoms certainly, and their field-goal percentage dropped to 38.7 percent for the series.

What they needed was a guy who could shoot a jumper, perhaps a forward with a size mismatch to complement Kenyon Martin. So when Martin bangs inside he can step outside against a smaller Spurs defender like Bruce Bowen.

Someone, oh, like ... Keith Van Horn?

Yes, that's who the Nets are missing, their favorite Finals whipping boy from last season -- someone who could spread the defense and be enough of a threat to get the Spurs out of that zone and hit some jumpers.

Let's face it: The Mutombo trade was a disaster. It had good intentions in adding a big guy to combat the big guys in the West the Nets hoped to inevitably see. Look, the Nets went for the championship. And that's the right way to think.

It didn't work out. And it could cost them in the series they really do have a chance to win. This isn't the Lakers or Kings. The Spurs remain very beatable. OK, Tony Parker has been terrific. But he could be very unterrific by tomorrow. He's been like that all through the playoffs. If you were building a roster from the two teams, you might pick three Nets before you got to another Spur after Duncan.

But the Nets are handicapped by their roster.

Though Mutombo had a marginal effect in the Nets' Game 2 victory, it's clear coach Byron Scott doesn't want to play him. He did so reluctantly in Game 2 after being second-guessed by everyone but Willard Scott. Willard wondered where Mutombo was, too. So Scott gave in. Byron, that is.

But he doesn't want to play that way. The Nets need to run. Run Nets run. See the Nets walk. See the Nets lose.

Mutombo can't run. He inhibits the Nets more than he helps them. They play a slashing, back-cutting kind of game in the halfcourt that Mutombo only clogs. Where are those Martin baseline lob passes for dunks? Where are those slice cuts in the vaunted Princeton offense? Mutombo is a liability on offense. Aaron Williams, quietly losing his playing time in the Mutombo Finals experiment, fits the Nets aggressive offensive style better.

And by the way, since when do you sit a player virtually all season because of injuries and adjustment -- and through the playoffs -- and then discover him in the Finals?

And poor Jefferson. Nobody wants to call a foul for him. Poor baby. He attempted more free throws than any Net this season. But it's his first season as a starter in the Finals. More pressure. More responsibility. Fewer calls.

So Richard isn't happy. The referees really respect that.

Jefferson also isn't a very good shooter. He made six 3-pointers in 80 games. No one's getting up on him. Take that shot, R.J.! He really doesn't want to. He's just a not-quite-ready-for-Finals, prime-time player.

It was a nice plan to say the Nets could move Jefferson into the starting lineup and lose little by trading Van Horn -- and actually gain some. Jefferson is a better defender. He runs the break better with Kidd. He's ready to start. And then you get Mutombo for, really, nothing.

But you also lose something. That burst of energy, enthusiasm and aggressiveness that Jefferson brought with him from the bench. Rodney Rogers can't do that with all the weight he's also carrying. In fact, the Nets' bench adds almost nothing. Lucious Harris is a nice shooter to have, but it got so bad for Jefferson in the 84-79 Game 3 loss that Scott had to sit him most of the last half of the fourth quarter to try to get the Nets back in the game.

Van Horn could make a big difference. He can't defend that well. He'd probably play the Spurs' small forward, Bowen, who wants no part of shooting. Bowen is a fine defender, but what an option that could be for the Nets to have a 6-foot-10 Van Horn to post up and relieve Martin, the team's only true low-post threat.


Jefferson is going to be a very good player. He just isn't yet. He's become a very good regular-season player. But is it worth wasting this chance while he learns the next level?

OK, Van Horn wasn't great in last year's Finals. But the Spurs aren't the Lakers, either. Martin played the big bad bully after the sweep by L.A. and basically blamed it all on Van Horn. So it wasn't surprising to see Van Horn traded. Even Nets management doesn't want to mess with Martin.

But how would the Nets look now with Van Horn?

They're averaging 85 points in the three games and losing by five points with Jefferson averaging 9.7. He could easily do that coming off the bench, especially with matchups against Spurs reserves like Manu Ginobili. Van Horn could make a big difference. He can't defend that well. He'd probably play the Spurs' small forward, Bowen, who wants no part of shooting. Bowen is a fine defender, but what an option that could be for the Nets to have a 6-foot-10 Van Horn to post up and relieve Martin, the team's only true low-post threat.

The Nets tried to put Jason Kidd in the post several times late in the fourth quarter on Sunday to both get Kidd going on offense and take advantage of Parker's smallish size. The Spurs' zone and help defense didn't give Kidd many opportunities.

It's easy to be tough on Van Horn. He backs away from shots from time to time, and he isn't as aggressive as you'd like. Coaches can see his advantages in quickness and shooting ability and grow frustrated when he won't use them. If only Keith would ... so he gets traded.

But the alternative has been horrible for the Nets in the Finals. Mutombo flops around, getting in the way of the offense, and Williams gets a reduced role. Jefferson is asked to do more than he's capable of, and the Nets' half-court weaknesses are exposed. It's hardly over, but Van Horn could have made a big difference for the Nets.
all those years as a fan and now i'm the anti-knick. life is crazy aint it.
AUTOADVERT
KARNIVORE
Posts: 20358
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/13/2003
Member: #382
Nigeria
6/10/2003  3:33 PM
that was on point !!!
ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, BUT THEY ARE NOT TREATED EQUAL !!!
ARES
Posts: 20715
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #406
6/11/2003  10:59 AM
didn't read the article keith would of done what he always done in this finals, THAT is nothing.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK BIG CITY OF DREAMS, BUT EVERYTHING IN NEW YORK AINT ALWAYS WHAT IT SEEMS
ARES
Posts: 20715
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #406
6/11/2003  11:00 AM
how come keith didn't help the sixers bust detroits Zone. they got to. how come keith didn't help bust the lakers zone last year.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK BIG CITY OF DREAMS, BUT EVERYTHING IN NEW YORK AINT ALWAYS WHAT IT SEEMS
Pike
Posts: 21378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/13/2003
Member: #403
6/11/2003  11:27 AM
... because he sucks?
necrom33
Posts: 20283
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/11/2002
Member: #234
USA
6/11/2003  12:02 PM
Yeah, KVH would've helped NJ!! ROFL Get real.

KVH has never had the ability to shine in the spotlight and as a matter of fact, shies away from it (KVH supporters conveniently forgot his disappearance in the sixers elimination game. AGAIN).

RJ hasn't shined either, tho. That's why we'll see articles like the one Prod found. But the bottom line is that why should NJ give KVH another chance to fade and fold? Just because he has the potential to someday bring his A game to an important game?

NJ has gotten just as far without KVH as they did with him. If you want to look at it this way, they've gotten farther since they already won one game!
prodson
Posts: 20886
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/14/2003
Member: #395
Colombia
6/11/2003  12:07 PM
necrom i agree with you, the only reason why Van Horn name comes up is because richard jefferson hasn't done what was expected of him.

i just thought it was an interesting article
all those years as a fan and now i'm the anti-knick. life is crazy aint it.
Pike
Posts: 21378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/13/2003
Member: #403
6/11/2003  12:09 PM
True dat... Richard Jefferson has been a big disappointment, thus far.
ARES
Posts: 20715
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #406
6/11/2003  12:09 PM
sam smith take every thing he says with a grain of salt i read some of his stuff he is bogus.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK BIG CITY OF DREAMS, BUT EVERYTHING IN NEW YORK AINT ALWAYS WHAT IT SEEMS
necrom33
Posts: 20283
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/11/2002
Member: #234
USA
6/11/2003  12:12 PM
Posted by prodson:

necrom i agree with you, the only reason why Van Horn name comes up is because richard jefferson hasn't done what was expected of him.

i just thought it was an interesting article

Yeah, if RJ were playing just at the level he played during the regular season, this would be a moot point. SA has done a good job of cutting down his slashing to the hole and his J needs work.

If KVH were still in a NJ uni, tho, Malik Rose would be having even more of a field day!
Pike
Posts: 21378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/13/2003
Member: #403
6/11/2003  12:18 PM
Quite right Necrom, a lot of credit goes to the Spurs defensive effort. They are playing GREAT D.
ARES
Posts: 20715
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #406
6/11/2003  12:23 PM
KVH was a NET for 5 years and never brought it consistent, it was time to move on. Sam Smith has to get over it. KVH is disapearing in Philly as well and will soon be Philly's whipping boy. conversely to Sam Smith, article the nets haven't loss yet, last year with KVH theyt did not win one game.

The one debate they have is maybe they could of gotten more for kvh. I think the nets need a guard like a ray allen. maybe kvh,kittles and afirst round pick could of gotten him before the sonics made there offer.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK BIG CITY OF DREAMS, BUT EVERYTHING IN NEW YORK AINT ALWAYS WHAT IT SEEMS
prodson
Posts: 20886
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/14/2003
Member: #395
Colombia
6/11/2003  12:32 PM
good point about could have gotten more.


the nets were scared of shaq last year. they look at duncan as being a nice guy
all those years as a fan and now i'm the anti-knick. life is crazy aint it.
ARES
Posts: 20715
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #406
6/11/2003  1:18 PM
pitino was a lot more suceessful than this clown in college. he made it too the second round of the NCAA twice . wow Big whoopee.
NEW YORK, NEW YORK BIG CITY OF DREAMS, BUT EVERYTHING IN NEW YORK AINT ALWAYS WHAT IT SEEMS
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

6/12/2003  6:29 AM
How can you compare RJ with KVH? The guy (RJ) is a 2nd yr pro, KVH has been in the league for 5 -6 yrs. Bad comparison really, anyways RJ had the look last night and it was considered crunch time for Jersey Nuff Said!
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
prodson
Posts: 20886
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/14/2003
Member: #395
Colombia
6/12/2003  2:23 PM
playa i don't think the guy who wrote the article was comparing the two players. i think he was more or less saying that the nets could have had both jefferson and van horn playing in this series as opposed to your boy dikembe
all those years as a fan and now i'm the anti-knick. life is crazy aint it.
ARES
Posts: 20715
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #406
6/12/2003  2:27 PM
NEW YORK, NEW YORK BIG CITY OF DREAMS, BUT EVERYTHING IN NEW YORK AINT ALWAYS WHAT IT SEEMS
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

6/13/2003  6:28 AM
Prod that guy is a nut, if Deke wasn't playing for the nets this series it would be over, Martin would have been in foul trouble all series and Timmy would slap the backboard on his many dunks and layups.
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
prodson
Posts: 20886
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/14/2003
Member: #395
Colombia
6/13/2003  2:22 PM
HAHAHA. are you watching the spurs-nets series casue that's the series that WE'RE watching
all those years as a fan and now i'm the anti-knick. life is crazy aint it.
necrom33
Posts: 20283
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/11/2002
Member: #234
USA
6/16/2003  9:35 AM
Van Horn wouldn't have made a difference in this series...


Well, maybe. If he'd been here and starting, NJ could've lost in 4 again!

article on van horn & the nets

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.com All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.