NAME 			GP 	GS 	MIN 	PTS 	OFF 	DEF 	TOT 	AST 	STL 	BLK 	TO 	A/TO 	PF 	TECH
Jamal Crawford 		10 	10 	39.5 	18.0 	0.7 	2.3 	3.0 	5.0 	1.30 	0.50 	3.6 	1.39 	1.9 	0.0
Stephon Marbury 	9 	6 	35.2 	14.1 	0.7 	1.4 	2.1 	5.8 	1.11 	0.00 	2.1 	2.74 	3.2 	0.0
Nate Robinson 		10 	0 	21.0 	8.4 	1.1 	2.5 	3.6 	1.9 	0.50 	0.10 	1.3 	1.46 	2.9 	0.0
Quentin Richardson 	9 	9 	29.9 	6.8 	1.1 	5.2 	6.3 	1.1 	0.67 	0.22 	1.3 	0.83 	2.9 	0.0
Fred Jones 		7 	2 	18.4 	5.3 	0.9 	1.9 	2.7 	1.0 	1.14 	0.29 	1.9 	0.54 	1.1 	0.0
Mardy Collins 		5 	3 	16.4 	3.2 	0.4 	1.2 	1.6 	1.6 	0.60 	0.00 	1.6 	1.00 	1.8 	0.0


NAME			FGM	FGA	FG%	3PM	3PA	3P%	FTM	FTA	FT%	2PM	2PA	2P%	PPS*	AFG%^
Jamal Crawford 		6.2 	15.5 	.400 	1.6 	5.1 	.314 	4.0 	4.7 	.851 	4.6 	10.4 	.442 	1.16 	.452
Stephon Marbury 	4.3 	11.3 	.382 	1.0 	2.9 	.346 	4.4 	5.3 	.833 	3.3 	8.4 	.395 	1.25 	.426
Nate Robinson 		2.9 	7.7 	.377 	1.4 	3.3 	.424 	1.2 	1.7 	.706 	1.5 	4.4 	.341 	1.09 	.468
Quentin Richardson 	2.7 	8.3 	.320 	0.7 	3.1 	.214 	0.8 	1.3 	.583 	2.0 	5.2 	.383 	0.81 	.360
Fred Jones 		1.7 	3.9 	.444 	0.6 	1.7 	.333 	1.3 	1.9 	.692 	1.1 	2.1 	.533 	1.37 	.519
Mardy Collins 		1.0 	3.2 	.313 	0.0 	0.4 	.000 	1.2 	1.6 	.750 	1.0 	2.8 	.357 	1.00 	.313

* PPS: Points Per Shot = PTS/FGA
^ AFG%: Adjusted Field Goal Percentage = [(PTS - FTM)/FGA]/2

Right, so besides Fred Jones, the whole lot is shooting 40% or less. Steph, Marbury play the bulk of the minutes and both are sieves.

Q plays D but can't shoot.

None runs a team.

This from a guy whole personified leadership, PG play and tough defense. It just doesn't add up.

They're good for a $hitload of BOOS as the Garden.

Man, Nate Robinson is exceptionally bad at 2 pt FG's. What the heck is that about?

our guards are terrible. that's where it starts.

Posted by TMS:

they're great at collecting dimes for charity

I think you've figured out what Steph meant in describing his averages.