[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Randolf has been a breath of fresh air & once he gets consistant time with this team...
Author Thread
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
11/19/2007  10:42 PM
Randolf has been a breath of fresh air & once he gets consistant time with this team there will be no more 4th quarter collapses
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/19/2007  10:43 PM
Thats suggesting we get to the 4th quarter with a remote chance of winning a game, lol.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Andrew
Posts: 26602
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
11/19/2007  10:47 PM
colorfl1, I'd like to think what you say is true, but why do you think Zach has been a breath of fresh air? How do you think he helps the Knicks close out games?
PURE KNICKS LOVE
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
11/19/2007  10:53 PM
balkman has been a breath of fresh air- so has collins- so has lee- none of them have been able to move the win loss needle.
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
11/19/2007  10:55 PM
The guy is only 25-26... and not close to his prime...
I am shocked someone with his developed talent level is on this sorry squad!

I really believe that knicks fans are going to fall in love with this guy. He is chasing down so many rebounds that everyone else's rebound numbers are significantly down...

He brings it every game and the knicks suck whenever he is not around.

How the hell did we steal this guy???
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/19/2007  10:58 PM
Hey man, he's doing a great job rebounding the ball and scoring in the post, although I think his overall shot selection is terrible (as evidenced by his 40% shooting %.)

We stole the guy because there he's had a litany of problems in his past, not only with the law, but with teammates. Theres a reason the Blazers gave up on him.

Listen, I'm not here to throw cold water on your post.. I'm just saying.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
11/19/2007  11:07 PM
Posted by Andrew:

colorfl1, I'd like to think what you say is true, but why do you think Zach has been a breath of fresh air? How do you think he helps the Knicks close out games?

he has been here just a short time and he has not developed any real chemistry yet... especially with the death is his family, even when he flies in to play, he is out of sorts and has not practiced...
we all knew he is a solid scorer... he has not yet even demonstrated his last year's stroke...
but it is his rebound numbers that have been consistantly staggering!

When he is in the game in the 4th quarter it opens up a lot of opportunities for the guards and centre...
He makes scoring late a lot easier just by being on the floor and drawing the attention of opposing defenses.

And keep in mind he is not even scratching the surface of what he will bring each night because he has logged on so few games with this squad.


--->better days are ahead... Isiah just risked his job by humiliating an unstable *bury to underlne a new focus on defensive intesity.
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/19/2007  11:09 PM
Randolf the Grey?
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
11/19/2007  11:22 PM
Posted by VDesai:

Randolf the Grey?
('');
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/19/2007  11:25 PM
He doesn't play defense.

And his FG% is atrocious.

So huh?


Zach Randolph is essentially a more tame Antoine Walker.

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 19-11-2007 11:26 PM]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/19/2007  11:36 PM
colorfl1, I think you made some good points. At this time we're not yet seeing the best of Zach yet. The team being a bit out of synch and not yet fully adjusted to Zach and him not being fully adjusted to them is going to limit his full effect. I like what he's brought so far. Yeah he's been taking some bad shots, but I think he'll settle into things as time moves along. He seems to be pressing a bit. Trying to make things happen instead of letting the game come to him. The thing is that he's a high volume shooter. Curry is actually the opposite. I'd like to see him shoot more and Zach be a bit more thoughtful about when he shoots.

The thing is that as you said, Zach is not old and this team is full of young players. I think we can move forward with this team and continue to improve the roster where we need help. It's not a bad group to build with IMO. PG and SG is the next area we need to improve on this roster. If we can do that, this is a very good team going forward. I wouldn't change anything else at this point.
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
11/19/2007  11:36 PM
Posted by bobs3304:

He doesn't play defense.

And his FG% is atrocious.

So huh?


Zach Randolph is essentially a more tame Antoine Walker.

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 19-11-2007 11:26 PM]

Look at his career FG %s.
once he gets in rhythm he is going to be a beast.
As far as his D is concerned... he may be a bit slow, but he has not dogged it on D like many others have.

(you cannot count the games he played during bereavment, where he did not practiceand looked a little out o synch)

Randolf is one of the few long term bright spots for this squad!
I would trade 5 Channing Freys for him... he was a steal.
He is a legitimate Stud.

BTW... in his most recent stint on bereavment leave he was no where near the strip clubs... so we actually are witnessing his growth as a professional.('');
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
11/19/2007  11:38 PM
I actually that Randolph has been good. Once he settles down and gets closer to his career FG%, he'll be fine.

it's not like he's a cure-all though.
¿ △ ?
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
11/19/2007  11:43 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I actually that Randolph has been good. Once he settles down and gets closer to his career FG%, he'll be fine.

it's not like he's a cure-all though.
The NBA is not that complicated... we can all agree that if you have a very good player at every position you will contend for a title...

So look at it this way, we no longer need to worry about a star PF for the next 8 years.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/19/2007  11:45 PM
His career % numbers are usually in the mid-40's. High 40's at most.

He takes ALOT of shots. He takes alot of BAD shots. Zach will literally shoot you out of a game, especially on a team like this where he'll force shots due to less touches.

His defense is bad. It's not horrendous like Curry's, but it's still bad.

The fact that he can't dunk the ball doesn't sit well with me, and I'm a HUGE Larry Bird fan so that's saying something.

I find his passing to be inconsistent as well.


If we got Darrell Arthur or Beasley in the draft I would **** on Zbo so fast his head would spin.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
11/19/2007  11:46 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I actually that Randolph has been good. Once he settles down and gets closer to his career FG%, he'll be fine.

it's not like he's a cure-all though.

This is true, but he doesn't have to be. It's really about the team and not any single player. Unless you have a superstar on your team, it always has to be that way. We don't have a LeBron, Wade, Kobe or Melo that can take up the slack for a really weak roster. We have to get good performances from many players. Right now Zach hasn't had the chance to really settle into any kind of groove. When he does, we'll see just how important and effective he can be. Still we need solid play from our guards and we haven't had that except for about 3-4 games. Then he wasn't here for a few games, so overall we haven't seen this team get a chance to get into a good chemistry together yet.

Zach, Curry and Lee are our most dependable performers IMO. Now if we can just find a good combination at the other positions we can get on track and win some games.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
11/19/2007  11:46 PM
Posted by colorfl1:
Posted by bobs3304:

He doesn't play defense.

And his FG% is atrocious.

So huh?


Zach Randolph is essentially a more tame Antoine Walker.

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 19-11-2007 11:26 PM]

Look at his career FG %s.
once he gets in rhythm he is going to be a beast.
As far as his D is concerned... he may be a bit slow, but he has not dogged it on D like many others have.

(you cannot count the games he played during bereavment, where he did not practiceand looked a little out o synch)

Randolf is one of the few long term bright spots for this squad!
I would trade 5 Channing Freys for him... he was a steal.
He is a legitimate Stud.

BTW... in his most recent stint on bereavment leave he was no where near the strip clubs... so we actually are witnessing his growth as a professional.('');

So you think he can go to strip clubs before or after the funeral?
He may be had some problems but not to this extend.

Zach is not the problem (so far) but he is not a solution either.
If this team will run under the bus (or the truck) I am not sure how he will behave.
He looked close to explode in the Nuggets blowout.

We need somebody to bring disconnected peaces we have (including Zach) together.
We need coach who can coach and players who can run plays and control the game.
What Zach has to do with filling these needs?














"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
11/19/2007  11:49 PM
Posted by colorfl1:
Posted by crzymdups:

I actually that Randolph has been good. Once he settles down and gets closer to his career FG%, he'll be fine.

it's not like he's a cure-all though.
The NBA is not that complicated... we can all agree that if you have a very good player at every position you will contend for a title...

So look at it this way, we no longer need to worry about a star PF for the next 8 years.

well, randolph is kinda fat. I doubt he'll be a "star" for the next 8 yrs. I'm not sure he's a star now, but he's definitely the closest thing we have to a star. though I don't think I want to build around him or anything.

most likely, he'll prevent the team from being utterly horrible and instead of having a top 5 lotto pick, we'll be picking at like 9, 10 or 11. there's too many problems. almost everything needs to be blown up. we have good role players, but they are meaningless, because the "stars" of our team are flawed beyond belief. our role players would help lead a team like Detroit or Cleveland or Orlando to the Finals, but here they are wasted. and people have said this before, but you can't really build a team role players first. you usually need to draft a superstar and construct a team to fit that superstar. we've been trying the Pistons 2004 model for a while with Zeke, but without the defense, character, maturity or unselfishness in the players we get.
¿ △ ?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30380
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
11/19/2007  11:49 PM
The fact that Randolph takes about 20shots per game, has only 1.2assist per game, and turns the ball over 3.2 times a game really really bugs me.

He has been a great rebounder, but so far he has been inefficent scorer, horrible with ball control, and a black hole to go along with being a great rebounder. And if this is what we are going to get when it comes to him. Then his rebounding isn't going to make up for his lack of efficency.

Its up to him to get it together and prove that he can be efficent rather than us just hoping one day he will turn it around. After going through Marbury & Crawford & Curry . I don't think I can trust any player to turn it around.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/19/2007  11:50 PM
Zach doesn't fill a single need at all.

It will be looked at as one of the stupidest trades of the past 5 years (trumped only by the Curry trade).

Did we need rebounding - NO.

Did we need scoring or post offense - NO.

Did we need "talent" - NO.

Did we need a PF - NO.




And that's really the bottom line isn't it. No one cares if you win a trade on talent if it DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

Sure, the Heat could trade Wade for Yao, but why the **** would you do that?


Portland accomplished something - TO GET CAP SPACE, A SMALL CHIP, AND GET RID OF A POISON.

What the hell did we accomplish?

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 19-11-2007 11:52 PM]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Randolf has been a breath of fresh air & once he gets consistant time with this team...

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy