This is a tricky question, and we all know it. The whole problem with this team is about context. I'll take lee next to zach any day of the week, but i don't necessarily think that lee is better than curry. If you don't understand what i just said, just keep thinking about it.

Thread # 1001 from Bonn bashing Eddy. Look, Lee is a PF, Curry is a center. If Curry is only getting 22 minutes on this team then there is a problem becauise neither Zach or Lee should be playing center for an extended period of time.

Isiah is the blame for putting togther these odd parts that dont mesh. As good as Zach is, there was no need to trade for him. We all know we needed a hybrid PF/Center who is effective without the ball in his hands to play along side Curry. Isiah just looked at Zachs numbers and didnt give a seceond thought as to how Zch and Eddy (and Lee for that matter) might worl together. Now we are stuck with 2 power forwards who are both deserving of mucho playing time.

I hate to say it, but this bobs character is on to something. He likes to talk about how a team needs to fit together and I believe he is right.

I don't care which player fits better with another player, this team is so poorly constructed i want to puke!

Posted by nixluva:

Why is it we keep assuming that there's a problem with Zach, Curry & Lee is a problem for this team that needs to be fixed. They are a strength of this team. Once we get our perimeter player situation straight we'll be fine. It's our Guards and SF's that we've had issues with, not our PF/C contingent.

There's a problem with *EVERYTHING* on this team