[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

You want a smart name we should be going after?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/19/2007  3:18 PM
Jarrret Jack

Tall athletic PG who will fit in nicely with what we have going on.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/19/2007  3:40 PM
Man, I was saying we should go after Jack as an anti-marbury guard of the future. They don't seem to like Jack in portland..... we already did one deal, why not two????
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/19/2007  3:46 PM
Posted by Anji:

Man, I was saying we should go after Jack as an anti-marbury guard of the future. They don't seem to like Jack in portland..... we already did one deal, why not two????

They seem to obssess with picks. Give them a number 1 lottery protected and Nate for Jack and a second rounder back.
RIP Crushalot😞
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/19/2007  4:21 PM
If we gave they get a pick, I would rather send Collins the Nate. Also they still have Raef and Miles big contracts, Maybe we could turn a rose and James into Raef.

But it seems like they want to draft every player on their roster.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/19/2007  4:28 PM
Isiah has really screwed the knicks with his inability to be creative we shouldn't have rose, jefferies, or james on the roster, and he should have made the smart pick which was Jack, which i was begging for. The guy is a leader, he is big, he is physical and goes about his business.....He had the chance to get a better version in lowry last year but didn't.

We need to get Rid of the following: Jones, Dickau, Crawford, Jefferies, James, Nate but who wants them
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/19/2007  4:37 PM
Who wants Jamaal and Nate???? Who doesn't??? The thread is about trying to get Jack,how do you turn it into a dumping on who ever???

If Jack came I would rather trade Collins, because Jack is a better version of him.

[Edited by - Anji on 07-19-2007 4:48 PM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/19/2007  4:39 PM
how about we just tank the season and land in the lottery and get a PG that way.

Or, we could try to win, miss the play offs, barely, and end up with a mid level pick.
BigRedDog
Posts: 22229
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 1/23/2004
Member: #569
7/19/2007  4:51 PM
A #1 and nate?? WAY TOO MUCH to give up. You can't keep throwing away #1 picks.
fishmike 9/27/2024 11:00 PM Ug I hate this. The idea of Towns is great until you see what a pussy he is. Jules is a dog. DD was a flamethrower locked up cheap for 3 more years. First Leon move I hate
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/19/2007  4:58 PM
Jack's not much of an upgrade over Mardy IMO... i think if u give Mardy minutes he can give you 10 & 6 type #'s easy & play better defense than Jack to boot... Jack wouldn't start over Marbury either... why give up any assets for a backup PG that might not even be the 1st PG off the bench?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/19/2007  5:06 PM
Posted by TMS:

Jack's not much of an upgrade over Mardy IMO... i think if u give Mardy minutes he can give you 10 & 6 type #'s easy & play better defense than Jack to boot... Jack wouldn't start over Marbury either... why give up any assets for a backup PG that might not even be the 1st PG off the bench?

I guess people thought that way about Chauncey Billups too. If they havent gone 18-9 45% --some people cant see that they can. Marbury is not going to last much longer.
RIP Crushalot😞
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/19/2007  5:10 PM
well then i guess i'm some people, because Jack doesn't wow me in the least... i think Mardy has just as much talent & can give you better defense at the position... just my opinion.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/19/2007  5:17 PM
One good thing about Isiah not being able to make another deal is that it will allow us time to get a look at the young players we have. I honestly feel that we have what we need already on the team. Mardy, Nichols, Chandler and Balkman would give us what we need if we allow them to develop. All this pushing for trades is just more of the same stuff that so many have been complaining about and yet they keep suggesting more trades.

I want to see what these kids can do. They have a lot of upside and they fit our needs. We'll be right on track in a couple of years if we can be patient.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
7/19/2007  5:45 PM
Jack is better then Mardy, no question about it.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
7/19/2007  5:55 PM
Posted by nixluva:

One good thing about Isiah not being able to make another deal is that it will allow us time to get a look at the young players we have. I honestly feel that we have what we need already on the team. Mardy, Nichols, Chandler and Balkman would give us what we need if we allow them to develop. All this pushing for trades is just more of the same stuff that so many have been complaining about and yet they keep suggesting more trades.

I want to see what these kids can do. They have a lot of upside and they fit our needs. We'll be right on track in a couple of years if we can be patient.

I like when Thomas ran the three guard lineup. I could see him really using Mardy in a role of point forward. Shooters/Penetrators at the top with power post down low.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
CDB
Posts: 20581
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/23/2007
Member: #1583
7/19/2007  6:42 PM
When did 6'3 became "tall" in the NBA?
"I wipe my @ss with your feelings" - Tony Soprano
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/19/2007  7:36 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by nixluva:

One good thing about Isiah not being able to make another deal is that it will allow us time to get a look at the young players we have. I honestly feel that we have what we need already on the team. Mardy, Nichols, Chandler and Balkman would give us what we need if we allow them to develop. All this pushing for trades is just more of the same stuff that so many have been complaining about and yet they keep suggesting more trades.

I want to see what these kids can do. They have a lot of upside and they fit our needs. We'll be right on track in a couple of years if we can be patient.

I like when Thomas ran the three guard lineup. I could see him really using Mardy in a role of point forward. Shooters/Penetrators at the top with power post down low.

That is the interesting wild card in the whole debate over the minutes at the 3. We could really play Mardy at point forward and let our combo guards run around for open looks while Zach and Eddy set screens for them and get into post position.

Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/19/2007  7:37 PM
Posted by CDB:

When did 6'3 became "tall" in the NBA?

6-3 200 is a big PG
RIP Crushalot😞
CDB
Posts: 20581
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/23/2007
Member: #1583
7/19/2007  7:43 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by CDB:

When did 6'3 became "tall" in the NBA?

6-3 200 is a big PG
Big Im talking about height, which was something that you was pointing out.
"I wipe my @ss with your feelings" - Tony Soprano
Ira
Posts: 24695
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
7/19/2007  8:41 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Jarrret Jack

Tall athletic PG who will fit in nicely with what we have going on.

He is a good young pg who would be a good fit. But why do you think he might be available?
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
7/20/2007  2:03 AM
Was not Jack considered the 2nd coming of Marbury in Tech? He is supposed to have like the same game. Considering how we (well a lot of us) feel about Marbury, why the sudden love for Jack?
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
« Reply To Topic
You want a smart name we should be going after?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy