Seattle has Wilkins, that french kid, green, and durant. What does that mean? They have no use for wally Z.

Malik and Jerome are buyout candidates. Jerome is loved in seatle. Seattle needs a draw. So add Nate.

Malik, Jerome and Nate for wally Z and sene.

Seattle has durant and green. They supposedly don't like their point guards. Nate is by far a better scorer than the two players they have. Seattle loves him out there. To me it makes perfect sense for them. I think Nate could mess around and average 15-18pts per out there.

The knicks get a shooter at the 3 to spread the defense. At this stage in the game wally would probably be suited for a bench role. If he proves he still can fill it up then that is better for the knicks. The guy is vocal and brings fire and intensity.

Would marbs like it? Who cares? Let them scrap at the practice facility. When wally is burrying daggers after a pass from marbs, marbs will gladly shut the **** up about that check wally have him.

Well?

Perfect Crawford, Wally, Zach, Eddy, all we need is another guy with no defensive skills and we are in business

Zach
Q
Curry
Marbs
Craw
Lee
Wally
Morris
Collins
Jones
Balkman
Jared
Chandler
Dickau
Nichols

Talk about deep? Knicks would be able to withstand major injury with no problem.

I like Wally. He would be perfect with Curry and Zach.

I hate to say it, but if q is half as healthy as he says (and he probably is) I say ship the seattle triplets home (jj, craw, nate) and bring wally back to new york and start him at the 3.

jj2 leading a second unit of lee, balkman and collins is not bad.

I like crawford...btw...but with zach, wally will drain open 3 after open 3...and he's scrappy and I like that.

combine lee and wally and you have a complete player.

Posted by babyKnicks:

I hate to say it, but if q is half as healthy as he says (and he probably is) I say ship the seattle triplets home (jj, craw, nate) and bring wally back to new york and start him at the 3.

jj2 leading a second unit of lee, balkman and collins is not bad.

I like crawford...btw...but with zach, wally will drain open 3 after open 3...and he's scrappy and I like that.

combine lee and wally and you have a complete player.

For 2 years we have been dealing with, "if Q is healthy." I will believe it when the season ends. In 2 years Q has yet to play more than 55 games each year. We can't afford to be dealing Jamal in hopes that Q will be healthy. NOt only that, Q is not a play maker and neither is Wally. We have scorers with Marbury, Zach, and Curry we need another playmaker on the court to keep a balance. Jamal might be the best passer on the team.

Now as far as Wally. A year ago I think he only played 32 games, and the year before that I think he missed 40 games. This Knicks team will be in more touble with new lineups every night if you have a lineup with Wally and Q.

Last year this team started actually play better when you had Jamal and Marbury starting together. Two years we tried Q at the 2 guard do we really want to go back to that? Q is a sf. More chances of him getting injuried with Q playing the 2.

cool, we keep crawford.

I'm pretty concerned about the D, otherwise a shooter of Wally's caliber would really cure our ills. I think that should be the main objective for the 2 expirings.