[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Long anticipated Bippity view of the Zach trade
Author Thread
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  10:22 AM
1.) Good trade. We gave up guys that did not fit for our roster and obtained a guy who may not be a great fit for Eddie Curry but is certainly more talented than the guys we gave up. If you just analyze the pieces we definitely got the better end of the trade in my view.

2.) Fit-The chemistry is obviously an issue. It's obvious that all can see. When a 20-10 player is added to a borderline playoff team, then playoffs should be a given. But judging by the lovers, quotes like "if everything goes well we could win 43 games", we are all aware that chemistry will be an issue. His offcourt issues are a concern for me, but more important to me is his on court effect on Eddie Curry. We all know that if Eddie is not involved offensively that he is an absolute non factor. If the ball is being steered to someone else he literally disappears. IN this situation you really need a PG that can lead and distribute and make sure that both Zach and Eddie get their touches consistently. Is Steph up to the challenge? ONly time will tell. This underscores the importance of having a leader at the Pg position.

3.) Money-I can't beleive I'm going to say this, but "who cares". I'm through getting worked up on this issue. Yes, I do know the ramifications. Yes I do know how important it is not to overpay for guys that consistenlty lose. But I was never under the impression that Isiah was going to work to get under the cap and am just happy he made a deal in which we didn't get fleeced

4.) Overall impressions- Typical Isiah trade. Go for a guy with a career losing record and then hope to rehabilitate him. Once again the talent level of the team goes up after an Isiah trade, but the question marks persist. All of us are still wondering if we will be able to win, despite the leap forward in talent. Why? Because Isiah never targets guys that are proven winners. He never goes out and gets a guy that has proven he can lead a lesser team to more. He constantly brings in stat guys that have never won. And we the fan, both "lover" and "hater" are left to wonder if this is the guy that will finally get it? I'm as confused as everyone else. I love Zach's game but don't like him personally. I will have a hard time rooting for the guy, but pray that he leads my team to the promised land. I can't beleive we got a 20-10 guy at the PF spot for two guys we didn't need, while also not being able to understand how Zach and Eddie are going to fit. I can't beleive we are lucky enough to have two post up players of this caliber on the same team, while at the same time I can't beleive the chemistry problems that can arise from having 2 post up players of this caliber on the same team. Once again we are left watching a talented team and praying that these career losers can turn their basketball lives around and learn to win. Yet another season in Knickland.

In summary: A great trade for a great talent with the ability to lead us to the playoffs. Their isn't a 20-10 pf in the league you could add to this roster that doesn't make us a lock for the playoffs in terms of talent. Yet somehow even after this trade I am left wondering if we will make the playoffs. Only time will tell I guess. But with all the doomsday predictions by some, it's not all bad. You now have a PF/C combo that could grow together. It is possible. You now have have two guys that if they finally decide that winning basketball is most important to them could be a great pair with some hard work and learning of each other's games. If Isiah went out and targeted a young PG that can distribute the ball I would actually think we have a plan in the works. Once again in NY, a team built on career losers and I have no definitive answers. I am left wondering and hoping, instead of knowing.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 02-07-2007 10:28 AM]
I just hope that people will like me
AUTOADVERT
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  10:29 AM
You will notice that I left out any mention of how this affects our defense. The answer is simple, I don't feel that we will play any defense this year so why bother discussing it.
I just hope that people will like me
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/2/2007  10:30 AM
I didn't read your post, because it was too long, but I'm sure it was good.
https:// It's not so hard.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
7/2/2007  10:31 AM
Just kidding. I did read your post, but before you edited it. You're being much too reasonable. Your UK posting privileges should be revoked. (Unless you added something vindictive and spiteful when you edited it.)
https:// It's not so hard.
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
7/2/2007  10:33 AM
I agree, but all I here is he added more cap, he added more cap.

The guy is putting better numbers then J.O and Im almost sure we would have had to give him about 5 more mil with atleast one more year then Zach.
ES
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  10:46 AM
It's not about the numbers. It's about the fit. Does he fit? Can he and Eddie co-exist? Number 2, can we rely on him? Will he focus on winning or continue to do off-court things that affect the team. Can we expect him to try to mold his game to fit Eddies(and vice versa), or will we hear him and Eddie pout and disappear when they aren't getting touches?

It's so much more than numbers. We should all know this by now. The problem with Steve Francis wasn't talent. It was the fact that he had no idea how to fit into any type of team concept. Unless he got the ball 80 times a game he had no effect on this team in a positive manner. Will this situation be similar? Will Zach or Eddie become Steve Francis?

It's a valid question. I asked these questions last year and was attacked by Nixluva and a few others, but after a year of Francis I think people are a little more cautious this year. We added unbeleiveable talent, but we all know the question marks are still there.

I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  10:55 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:

Just kidding. I did read your post, but before you edited it. You're being much too reasonable. Your UK posting privileges should be revoked. (Unless you added something vindictive and spiteful when you edited it.)

I don't think I added anything all that important. The only line I added was "basketballJones is the reason we will lose this year". Other than that, nothing was changed.
I just hope that people will like me
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/2/2007  10:55 AM
No arguements here. Pretty much agree with everything you said. 20-10 guys are rare and if you can get them for what we gave up, its a no brainer.

Chemistry issues are a concern. Despite Zach's versatility, you hope he and Eddy can coexist in the paint. You bring up a great point about the point guard position. Steph is a lead guard, and even if he scales back on his shot attempts, he's still not a classic orchestrator. Hope it can work. If not, Steph is expiring next year, so he can be moved and another point can be brought in that may be a better fit. Time is still on our side in terms of our big men. Curry is 24, Zach 25.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

7/2/2007  11:03 AM
Posted by knicks1248:

I agree, but all I here is he added more cap, he added more cap.


One can only wonder why with all the talk about possible issues of fit and chemistry, off-court troubles, microfracture surgery, etc, all you allow yourself to hear is that he added more payroll. Very curious indeed.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  11:08 AM
I think that is one thing that Marbs was learning last year, but it is possibly the single hardest thing to learn in basketball. Marbs thinks that by cutting his shot attempts down he is being an orchestrator. But it's so much more than that. It's getting the ball to the right people at the right time when they are in a position to succeed. Knowing when a guy is fading out of the game and bringing him back to life. Knowing when a guy is getting frustrated and getting him the ball in position to do something positive so that you can erase that frustration. There is so much more to the position than just coming down and passing it to someone.

I think Marbs did an admirable job last year. He actually learned some skills at the PG position for the first time in his career over the past two seasons. He's getting better, but we have to look to the future. We cannot build Steph's team. It must be Eddie or Zach's team(unfortunately so far they have shown no capacity to lead or want to lead a team). A young PG , some shooters and some frontcourt defensive beasts must be on the agenda.

Unfortunately I think that this means David Lee's days are numbered(at least if I was GM). I love the guy, but we need some bruisers and shot blockers up front. We have to build a frontline that can cover for each other. In that case it seems obvious to me that Lee or Eddie or even Zach have to be moved for a different player. If the goal is a title you need more than what we have. You cannot ignore defense.
I just hope that people will like me
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/2/2007  11:11 AM
i think we're gonna run a 2 man game with steph + zach on one side with jamal + eddy on the other.

this *could* work offensively but we have no defense coming out of the 4/5 spot to fall back on, especially in the event the it doesn't work on the offensive end.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/2/2007  11:13 AM
djsu - if the Lakers can run a triangle, can the Knicks run a square?
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
7/2/2007  11:14 AM
bippity - outstanding analysis. You are my hero
once a knick always a knick
technomaster
Posts: 23361
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
7/2/2007  11:20 AM
It's been over a decade since I was last concerned about the cap. Other than paying a lot for cable TV, I don't really get a feel for what the cap means to me.

Somehow, we've had very creative GMs who've been able to create something out of nothing. The Knicks have made some incredible trades if you just consider the players that are being shuffled around.

An injured McDyess and a few bags of peanuts for a 20-10 PG in Marbury?
A 2nd round pick (Ariza) and a practically retired player for top-10 PG like Francis?
A washed up former superstar (Francis!) and a player who had a terrible soph year (Frye) for a player who just had a 24/10 season?

Yes, there are a salary cap ramifications, but realistically, how many key free agents have gotten shuffled around in the last 5 years for more than the MLE? And how many of the players who've moved have ended up going w/o a sign-and-trade?

Players are out to get their money - and with the current rules, all loopholes have been closed. A player's current team can ALWAYS offer more to a FA than another team.

With that in mind, I think the Knicks have done a wonderful job of drafting/showcasing young talent, then packaging 'em for young, but seasoned players. I don't think we've been clearly burned in any of our deals. Ariza was awesome this season (who knows what he'll do when Grant Hill is gone, though!), but Francis helped us get an all-star level player in Randolph.

The Knicks have done an amazing job of amassing talent compared to the late 90s, where our average age was probably pushing 30+.

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  11:21 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

i think we're gonna run a 2 man game with steph + zach on one side with jamal + eddy on the other.

this *could* work offensively but we have no defense coming out of the 4/5 spot to fall back on, especially in the event the it doesn't work on the offensive end.


There will be nights where teams will sag on Zach and Eddie and they will be unable to dish out of the post effectively. There will be other nights when they can dish out effectively and our shooters will not be shooting well. On those nights we will need defense and unfortunately don't have anywhere to turn. This can be exploited by playoff teams.
I just hope that people will like me
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060

7/2/2007  11:22 AM
Posted by Bippity10:

I think that is one thing that Marbs was learning last year, but it is possibly the single hardest thing to learn in basketball. Marbs thinks that by cutting his shot attempts down he is being an orchestrator. But it's so much more than that. It's getting the ball to the right people at the right time when they are in a position to succeed. Knowing when a guy is fading out of the game and bringing him back to life. Knowing when a guy is getting frustrated and getting him the ball in position to do something positive so that you can erase that frustration. There is so much more to the position than just coming down and passing it to someone.

I think Marbs did an admirable job last year. He actually learned some skills at the PG position for the first time in his career over the past two seasons. He's getting better, but we have to look to the future. We cannot build Steph's team. It must be Eddie or Zach's team(unfortunately so far they have shown no capacity to lead or want to lead a team). A young PG , some shooters and some frontcourt defensive beasts must be on the agenda.

Unfortunately I think that this means David Lee's days are numbered(at least if I was GM). I love the guy, but we need some bruisers and shot blockers up front. We have to build a frontline that can cover for each other. In that case it seems obvious to me that Lee or Eddie or even Zach have to be moved for a different player. If the goal is a title you need more than what we have. You cannot ignore defense.

Exactly. Marb and most lead guards aren't good at anticipating or seeing the play develop before it happends. I would like to see Marb get to hole looking to set Curry and or Zach up for a few easy buckets as opposed to looking for a foul.

I think Lee can still work with this team as slong as we can add a back up center who can provide the defense that we need. The problem is, Lee is one of best trading chips right now.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/2/2007  11:24 AM
Posted by technomaster:

It's been over a decade since I was last concerned about the cap. Other than paying a lot for cable TV, I don't really get a feel for what the cap means to me.

Somehow, we've had very creative GMs who've been able to create something out of nothing. The Knicks have made some incredible trades if you just consider the players that are being shuffled around.

An injured McDyess and a few bags of peanuts for a 20-10 PG in Marbury?
A 2nd round pick (Ariza) and a practically retired player for top-10 PG like Francis?
A washed up former superstar (Francis!) and a player who had a terrible soph year (Frye) for a player who just had a 24/10 season?

Yes, there are a salary cap ramifications, but realistically, how many key free agents have gotten shuffled around in the last 5 years for more than the MLE? And how many of the players who've moved have ended up going w/o a sign-and-trade?

Players are out to get their money - and with the current rules, all loopholes have been closed. A player's current team can ALWAYS offer more to a FA than another team.

With that in mind, I think the Knicks have done a wonderful job of drafting/showcasing young talent, then packaging 'em for young, but seasoned players. I don't think we've been clearly burned in any of our deals. Ariza was awesome this season (who knows what he'll do when Grant Hill is gone, though!), but Francis helped us get an all-star level player in Randolph.

The Knicks have done an amazing job of amassing talent compared to the late 90s, where our average age was probably pushing 30+.


And yet it's the most unsuccesfful era since Patrick was born. Talent is meaningless if it doesn't fit. Again, I was killed for saying it last year, but I think the "lovers" are finally starting to get it.
I just hope that people will like me
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/2/2007  11:26 AM
Posted by misterearl:

djsu - if the Lakers can run a triangle, can the Knicks run a square?

as long as it ain't the rhombus, we should be alright
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/2/2007  11:28 AM
It's been over a decade since I was last concerned about the cap. Other than paying a lot for cable TV, I don't really get a feel for what the cap means to me.
Somehow, we've had very creative GMs who've been able to create something out of nothing. The Knicks have made some incredible trades if you just consider the players that are being shuffled around.

An injured McDyess and a few bags of peanuts for a 20-10 PG in Marbury?
A 2nd round pick (Ariza) and a practically retired player for top-10 PG like Francis?
A washed up former superstar (Francis!) and a player who had a terrible soph year (Frye) for a player who just had a 24/10 season?

& out of all those brilliant moves by Knicks management, we have exactly 1 embarassing 4 game sweep by the Nets in the first round of the playoffs to show for it, followed up by several consecutive sorry ass seasons of losing & being the laughing stock of the NBA... at some point, isn't it time to reassess these types of moves & go with a different strategy?

[Edited by - TMS on 07-02-2007 11:28 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TheGame
Posts: 26658
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/2/2007  11:32 AM
Posted by Bippity10:
Posted by technomaster:

It's been over a decade since I was last concerned about the cap. Other than paying a lot for cable TV, I don't really get a feel for what the cap means to me.

Somehow, we've had very creative GMs who've been able to create something out of nothing. The Knicks have made some incredible trades if you just consider the players that are being shuffled around.

An injured McDyess and a few bags of peanuts for a 20-10 PG in Marbury?
A 2nd round pick (Ariza) and a practically retired player for top-10 PG like Francis?
A washed up former superstar (Francis!) and a player who had a terrible soph year (Frye) for a player who just had a 24/10 season?

Yes, there are a salary cap ramifications, but realistically, how many key free agents have gotten shuffled around in the last 5 years for more than the MLE? And how many of the players who've moved have ended up going w/o a sign-and-trade?

Players are out to get their money - and with the current rules, all loopholes have been closed. A player's current team can ALWAYS offer more to a FA than another team.

With that in mind, I think the Knicks have done a wonderful job of drafting/showcasing young talent, then packaging 'em for young, but seasoned players. I don't think we've been clearly burned in any of our deals. Ariza was awesome this season (who knows what he'll do when Grant Hill is gone, though!), but Francis helped us get an all-star level player in Randolph.

The Knicks have done an amazing job of amassing talent compared to the late 90s, where our average age was probably pushing 30+.


And yet it's the most unsuccesfful era since Patrick was born. Talent is meaningless if it doesn't fit. Again, I was killed for saying it last year, but I think the "lovers" are finally starting to get it.

So far, but this is the year that our talent should prove its worth. We are 2 years removed from the LB experiment. Guys like Lee and Nate have a couple of years under their belt. The rest of the team is young but does have 5+ years of experience in many cases. Balkman and Collins have a year under their belt and should be prepared to contribute more next year. I am not going to get caught up on the past failures because I realize the team needed to transition to younger players. This year however there should be no excuses. The fans should not start out booing the team. We have have depth at every position so injuries should not hold us back. The team has already had a year with the offensive and defensive systems. Simply put, the team needs to show marked improvement and make the playoffs. If that happens, then the past was just the growing pains we had to endure to get to this point. Otherwise, I agree with the haters and everything needs to be torn down and IT fired.
Trust the Process
Long anticipated Bippity view of the Zach trade

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy