[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Simmons: Is he really Mr. Big Shot?
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/1/2007  11:16 AM
3. Announcers and studio guys steadfastly continuing to call Chauncey Billups "Mr. Big Shot," quite possibly the most undeserved sports nickname of this century. Here's a quick recap of Chauncey's career:

1997-2001: Bounces around from Boston to Toronto to Denver to Orlando to Minnesota.

2002: Plays well enough for the T-Wolves (0-3 in the '02 playoffs) that Detroit gives him a $30 million contract.

2003: Leads a Pistons team that eventually gets swept in the 2003 Eastern finals by New Jersey … and gets destroyed by Jason Kidd in the process. Billups shot 11 for 40 in the series; Kidd averaged 23.5 points, 7.5 assists and 10 rebounds per game. To be fair, Billups was playing with a sprained ankle. Just pointing out that the "Mr. Big Shot" nickname hadn't kicked in yet.


2004: Shoots 39 percent in the regular season, gets hot in the playoffs, leads the Pistons to the title, makes some big shots along the way, and somehow picks up the name "Mr. Big Shot."


2005: Leads the Pistons to the Finals, makes some big shots along the way, then pulls a relative no-show in Game 7 (13 points, 3 for 8 from the field, no big shots).


2006: Heading into the playoffs, with the Pistons peaking as a 64-win team, I wrote that Billups was "one more killer spring away from moving into the pantheon of Big Game Guards, along with Sam Jones, Jerry West, Dennis Johnson and Walt Frazier. Out of anyone in the playoffs other than Kobe, he's the one who can make the biggest leap historically. Well, unless Artest charges into the stands again."


Didn't happen. During the last three games of the Eastern semis against Cleveland -- which the Pistons nearly blew -- Billups shot 13 for 34. In the six-game loss to Miami in the Eastern finals, he shot 39 percent and 3 for 14 in the deciding game. So much for the pantheon of Big Game Guards.


2007: Struggled in the Chicago series (39 percent shooting), then completely flopped in the first four games of the Cavs series (22-for-57 shooting, 32 turnovers, some killer mistakes at the end of Games 3 and 4), to the point that people are now openly wondering how much money he's costing himself this summer.

So here's my question: With all due respect to Billups -- who's been a valuable player, a gamer and a winner over the past few years -- can we really keep calling a 41 percent career shooter who slapped together one great playoffs and nine-tenths of another great playoffs "Mr. Big Shot"? Isn't that a little insulting to Robert Horry? I vote that we call him "Chauncey" or "Billups" unless he completely redeems himself over these next few weeks. This meeting is adjourned.


It is a very interesting take on Billups as a player, I myself have been hard on Steph, and I know others have been as well, but is steph a victim of circumstance or was he just to dumb to realize he was in the perfect situation in Minnesota and left. Or is he just to selfish to understand how to win? Billups is a much tougher defender which helps other players follow.

Have injuries to key players like Jason Kidd, Jermaine O'Neal and a year later to Shaq and DWade, made Billups into Mr. Bigshot and doubled his salary or is he really the player who the media has made him out to be?

AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/1/2007  11:50 AM
I've seen alot of Chauncey Billups this playoffs and I really havent been impressed. He's made numerous and I mean NUMEROUS costly turnovers and has taken several horrible shots in clutch situations. I think this whole Mr. Big Shot deal is extremely overrated. He earned that rep while playing for a coach who kept him under control (I don't have to say that coaches name) and since then he's living off a false-rep.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/1/2007  12:10 PM
You mean the same coach that had jamal playing under control for the first time in his career while averaging over 20pts 7ass and 4rb.....

Good thing we fired him before he helped everyone realize defense, rebounding, and sharing the ball leads to wins...

Thank goodness isiah instilled unity and allowed nate to dance in huddles before games
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
6/1/2007  12:14 PM
shaddup already about LB. He managed to coach ONE guy on our roster well. Jamal had a better year this year under Isiah anyway.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/1/2007  12:31 PM
i hope your ****ing joking he shot 40% 32% from three great year
martin
Posts: 80980
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/1/2007  12:35 PM
Posted by kam77:

shaddup already about LB. He managed to coach ONE guy on our roster well. Jamal had a better year this year under Isiah anyway.

How was Jamal better last year under Isiah?

when I look at HOW craw played from year-to-year, he was more under control and had a more mid-range game with more FTs. Overall his FG% was UP under LB and his game seemed to be under more control.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
6/1/2007  1:02 PM
Jamal's distribution of FGAs in 05/06:
http://www.82games.com/0506/05NYK4A.HTM

and in 06/07:
http://www.82games.com/0607/06NYK4A.HTM

Damn near identical.

The biggest difference is that under Isiah, more of those long jumpers were 3s. 5.9 3PA/40 min under Isiah, 4.6 3PA/40 under Larry. Also a *slight* advantage in FTAs under Larry, 5.6 FTA/40min vs 4.9 FTA/40min. The net effect was that Jamal was slightly more efficient under Larry, .544 true shooting % vs .517 under Isiah.

But the differences tend to be overstated, seems to me. Jamal was remarkably similar under both coaches.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/1/2007  1:39 PM
I don't think so when you look at progress, jamal was his usual self till he bought in the last month really of the regular season, his shot selection was still iffy but, his defensive effort was increased

22.2pts 5.7ass 3.6rbs 2.4stls 3.2tos 43% was his last month........
martin
Posts: 80980
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/1/2007  1:58 PM
Posted by tomverve:

Jamal's distribution of FGAs in 05/06:
http://www.82games.com/0506/05NYK4A.HTM

and in 06/07:
http://www.82games.com/0607/06NYK4A.HTM

Damn near identical.

The biggest difference is that under Isiah, more of those long jumpers were 3s. 5.9 3PA/40 min under Isiah, 4.6 3PA/40 under Larry. Also a *slight* advantage in FTAs under Larry, 5.6 FTA/40min vs 4.9 FTA/40min. The net effect was that Jamal was slightly more efficient under Larry, .544 true shooting % vs .517 under Isiah.

But the differences tend to be overstated, seems to me. Jamal was remarkably similar under both coaches.

Jamal's overall efficiency plays out that he was much better under LB.

Different offenses, different coaches so it's hard to tell but when watching I liked his game 2 seasons ago much better.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
6/1/2007  2:02 PM
Much better? I don't see it. He was better but it's not night and day.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
RemBee76
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #89
USA
6/1/2007  4:27 PM
Posted by MS:

jamal was his usual self till he bought in the last month really of the regular season

So wait, you are saying that Jamal playing well for a month (really two) when games no longer mattered is justification for saying he played better under LB for the whole year? So what about Crawford's 21ppg on 42% shooting in January when the games did matter this year?

Jamal may have played a slightly more controled game under LB, but damn, even Stephon Marbury did that. This year Jamal was more productive across the board on a team battling to make the playoffs...simply a better year.




Its like a groupie website, or bitter ex-wives club. -Sebstar
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/1/2007  4:49 PM
A team battling to make the playoffs stop with laughable garbage. They didn't finish in the top 10 in a conference where two team openly tanked their season. It was the worst year in a longtime in the east

Battling, implies competing from start to finish, something the knicks didn't do all season
Simmons: Is he really Mr. Big Shot?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy