[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Can we trade with the Timberwolves?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
5/23/2007  2:56 PM
Minnesota Timberwolves

Incoming Players
Jamal Crawford
Salary: $7,200,000 Years Remaining: 5
PTS: 17.6 REB: 3.2 AST: 4.4 PER: 14.60
-Add Frye and Morris, and our late pick

Outgoing Players: Ricky DavisNew York Knicks

Incoming Players
Ricky Davis
Salary: $6,364,400 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 17.0 REB: 3.9 AST: 4.8 PER: 15.97
-Their Draft Selection which is could be Brandon Wright

This move if we can get it done would solve a couple of needs and get us the powerfoward we are looking for, while getting rid of Jamals contract. IF the wolves would go with it we would have Francis, Marbury, and Davis expiring all at once.......

Marbury/Collins
Davis/Nate
Q/Balkman
Lee/Jefferies
Curry/Wright
AUTOADVERT
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
5/23/2007  3:02 PM
Ricky in NY... Hmm..
This fan stuff.
He is not Artest but still can bring some drama.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
5/23/2007  3:04 PM
Hmmmmm. You funny but you crazy.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
5/23/2007  3:13 PM
Crawford vs. Davis

JC 17.6pts 4.4ass 3.2rbs 1.0stls 2.75tos 40%fg 32%fg
RD 17.0pts 4.8ass 3.9rbs 1.0stls 2.59tos 46%fg 39%fg

Ricky is the better player and defender, but they may like JC at the point and Randy at the two, channing at the 5.....
mikesknicks
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2004
Member: #684
USA
5/23/2007  3:24 PM
Crawford vs. Davis

JC 17.6pts 4.4ass 3.2rbs 1.0stls 2.75tos 40%fg 32%fg
RD 17.0pts 4.8ass 3.9rbs 1.0stls 2.59tos 46%fg 39%fg

Ricky is the better player and defender, but they may like JC at the point and Randy at the two, channing at the 5.....


I wouldn't say that Ricky Davis is the better player. He may have had a better year, but I think crawford is the better talent.
In the Knick of time. Knickal for Your thoughts.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
5/23/2007  3:26 PM
Posted by MS:

Crawford vs. Davis

JC 17.6pts 4.4ass 3.2rbs 1.0stls 2.75tos 40%fg 32%fg
RD 17.0pts 4.8ass 3.9rbs 1.0stls 2.59tos 46%fg 39%fg

Ricky is the better player and defender, but they may like JC at the point and Randy at the two, channing at the 5.....

This fills the SF spat hole somehow but makes the SG spot totally empty
It is no way to balance this team with one or even 2-3 trades
Exclusive mess...
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
5/23/2007  3:37 PM
In case you haven't notice, crawford never contributes to teams that aren't in the 49 loss column. Davis can play sg, hello...nate can be the backup in spot minutes.....Or Francis depending on whoever.....

I don't need 4 more years of low percentage shooting and zero defense. We are a mess but Wright has real potential and is noted as a hard worker and a good kid.....

We have Q and Balkman at the sf spot which I am very happy with right now, and if we want to trade nate for a late pick or package him away its all the better.....

With Crawford being the better talent? perhaps the deal gets done.....

RD 14.4pts 3.5ass 3.6rbs 1.1stls 45%fg 35%3fg
JC 13.6pts 4.0ass 2.7rbs 1.1stls 40%fg 34%3fg
Allanfan20
Posts: 36016
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
5/23/2007  5:02 PM
Maaan, you would love to get rid of Crawford.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
5/23/2007  5:04 PM
I wouldn't say that Ricky Davis is the better player. He may have had a better year, but I think crawford is the better talent.

And has a better attitude.

-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
5/23/2007  5:21 PM
Posted by MS:

Minnesota Timberwolves

Incoming Players
Jamal Crawford
Salary: $7,200,000 Years Remaining: 5
PTS: 17.6 REB: 3.2 AST: 4.4 PER: 14.60
-Add Frye and Morris, and our late pick

Outgoing Players: Ricky DavisNew York Knicks

Incoming Players
Ricky Davis
Salary: $6,364,400 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 17.0 REB: 3.9 AST: 4.8 PER: 15.97
-Their Draft Selection which is could be Brandon Wright

This move if we can get it done would solve a couple of needs and get us the powerfoward we are looking for, while getting rid of Jamals contract. IF the wolves would go with it we would have Francis, Marbury, and Davis expiring all at once.......

Marbury/Collins
Davis/Nate
Q/Balkman
Lee/Jefferies
Curry/Wright

Why would they give up their draft pick? They should be able to get an athletic big man to help KG--or if they trade KG isnt pick 5 extremely valuable to them?
RIP Crushalot😞
NYK3
Posts: 23572
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/30/2004
Member: #725
USA
5/23/2007  5:33 PM
Posted by MS:

In case you haven't notice, crawford never contributes to teams that aren't in the 49 loss column.
RIIIIIIIGHT, and how many winning teams has Ricky Davis been on? You're hate for Crawford is becoming annoying now
I wasn't born with enough middle fingers!!!
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/5/2007
Member: #1241
5/23/2007  5:34 PM
Posted by mikesknicks:
Crawford vs. Davis

JC 17.6pts 4.4ass 3.2rbs 1.0stls 2.75tos 40%fg 32%fg
RD 17.0pts 4.8ass 3.9rbs 1.0stls 2.59tos 46%fg 39%fg

Ricky is the better player and defender, but they may like JC at the point and Randy at the two, channing at the 5.....


I wouldn't say that Ricky Davis is the better player. He may have had a better year, but I think crawford is the better talent.

Talent means nothing when you've been in the league for years like Crawford has. He's not some prospective project where talent plays a big factor in a trade. We all know his game by now, his strengths (which are his talents), weaknesses.

I'd keep Crawford over Davis.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/23/2007  6:57 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by MS:

Minnesota Timberwolves

Incoming Players
Jamal Crawford
Salary: $7,200,000 Years Remaining: 5
PTS: 17.6 REB: 3.2 AST: 4.4 PER: 14.60
-Add Frye and Morris, and our late pick

Outgoing Players: Ricky DavisNew York Knicks

Incoming Players
Ricky Davis
Salary: $6,364,400 Years Remaining: 2
PTS: 17.0 REB: 3.9 AST: 4.8 PER: 15.97
-Their Draft Selection which is could be Brandon Wright

This move if we can get it done would solve a couple of needs and get us the powerfoward we are looking for, while getting rid of Jamals contract. IF the wolves would go with it we would have Francis, Marbury, and Davis expiring all at once.......

Marbury/Collins
Davis/Nate
Q/Balkman
Lee/Jefferies
Curry/Wright

Why would they give up their draft pick? They should be able to get an athletic big man to help KG--or if they trade KG isnt pick 5 extremely valuable to them?

because this is a weak draft and clearly Crawford, Frye and Morris are better than pick 5 in this years draft.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
5/23/2007  6:58 PM
I'd rather see if I can send Marbury 'home' to minny or get in on the KG sweeps- even if its as a third or fourth team helping swap players
« Reply To Topic
Can we trade with the Timberwolves?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy