[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Pick 23 according to mock drafts 4/24
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44925
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

4/25/2007  1:08 PM
I'm only gonna post nbadraft.net for now.

At 23, they have isiah drafting Josh Mcroberts. I don't think there is a chance in hell isiah picks him unless he proves himself in the draft camps. Can the guy get over himself and play with the pros? Is he a 4 or a 3?

Well the rest of the remaining projected 1st rounders in order are:
Rudy Fernandez
Javaris crittenton
Arron afflalo
Marcus Williams
Morris "everyones favorite hard on" almond
Marcus wiliams
Alando Tucker
Arron Gray

Out of that group who would you draft at 23?

Alando Tucker just jumps out at me as a dude isiah would go for.

Brandon rush declared do he could go somewhere here too.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
4/25/2007  1:13 PM
Marcus Williams

Because it would be funny.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/25/2007  1:19 PM
As of right now I like Morris Almond, but without having a bit more info from the Draft Camp, it's hard to settle on exactly who we should look to get. I think this draft is set up perfectly for a guy like Isiah and his staff. Lot's of solid players that can help a team deep into the draft. Just about any of the SG/SF's would be a plus at this point. A. Afflalo would be good too. Marcus Williams has some good pluses as well.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/25/2007  1:43 PM
I just hope Isiah takes the 2 way player that he feels has the highest upside. Forget current needs and think 3 years out.
I just hope that people will like me
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
4/25/2007  2:10 PM
Afflalo. Isiah needs an SG. And he's gone the UCLA route before.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
4/25/2007  2:18 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

I just hope Isiah takes the 2 way player that he feels has the highest upside. Forget current needs and think 3 years out.

I don't have a doubt that he's already been thinking forward. Balkman, Collins and Morris are exactly those kinds of picks. You have to imagine that he's looking for someone who can eventually be a very good player for this team. He's even said things in a way that gave you that impression. He's not talking like he's only looking for an NBA ready guy with a low ceiling. Perhaps a guy that can play a bit, but will likely get much better as time goes by. Time is on our side at this point. We have a mostly young team, so there's not need to feel panicked and rushed. He's got his extension too. Meanwhile we have vets like Steph, Q and Jamal who if healthy should push us into the playoffs next year and keep the pressure off him. He can look down the road 2 years and see more options.
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
4/25/2007  2:27 PM
IT's draft strategy has been to pick proven college players (other than Ariza). He does not really draft on potential but rather on performance.
Trust the Process
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/25/2007  2:32 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by Bippity10:

I just hope Isiah takes the 2 way player that he feels has the highest upside. Forget current needs and think 3 years out.

I don't have a doubt that he's already been thinking forward. Balkman, Collins and Morris are exactly those kinds of picks. You have to imagine that he's looking for someone who can eventually be a very good player for this team. He's even said things in a way that gave you that impression. He's not talking like he's only looking for an NBA ready guy with a low ceiling. Perhaps a guy that can play a bit, but will likely get much better as time goes by. Time is on our side at this point. We have a mostly young team, so there's not need to feel panicked and rushed. He's got his extension too. Meanwhile we have vets like Steph, Q and Jamal who if healthy should push us into the playoffs next year and keep the pressure off him. He can look down the road 2 years and see more options.

I agree with your point except I do have a doubt that Isiah is thinking this way. Jalen Rose, JJ, and Stevie tell me that anything is possible.
I just hope that people will like me
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
4/25/2007  2:37 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by Bippity10:

I just hope Isiah takes the 2 way player that he feels has the highest upside. Forget current needs and think 3 years out.

I don't have a doubt that he's already been thinking forward. Balkman, Collins and Morris are exactly those kinds of picks. You have to imagine that he's looking for someone who can eventually be a very good player for this team. He's even said things in a way that gave you that impression. He's not talking like he's only looking for an NBA ready guy with a low ceiling. Perhaps a guy that can play a bit, but will likely get much better as time goes by. Time is on our side at this point. We have a mostly young team, so there's not need to feel panicked and rushed. He's got his extension too. Meanwhile we have vets like Steph, Q and Jamal who if healthy should push us into the playoffs next year and keep the pressure off him. He can look down the road 2 years and see more options.

Look down the road 2 years???

Seriously, if you're not being paid by Isiah, you really should look into it.

So almost 6 years here just to see more options. Then what? Another 6 years to act on those options and build on them?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/25/2007  2:39 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by Bippity10:

I just hope Isiah takes the 2 way player that he feels has the highest upside. Forget current needs and think 3 years out.

I don't have a doubt that he's already been thinking forward. Balkman, Collins and Morris are exactly those kinds of picks. You have to imagine that he's looking for someone who can eventually be a very good player for this team. He's even said things in a way that gave you that impression. He's not talking like he's only looking for an NBA ready guy with a low ceiling. Perhaps a guy that can play a bit, but will likely get much better as time goes by. Time is on our side at this point. We have a mostly young team, so there's not need to feel panicked and rushed. He's got his extension too. Meanwhile we have vets like Steph, Q and Jamal who if healthy should push us into the playoffs next year and keep the pressure off him. He can look down the road 2 years and see more options.

Look down the road 2 years???

Seriously, if you're not being paid by Isiah, you really should look into it.

So almost 6 years here just to see more options. Then what? Another 6 years to act on those options and build on them?

That's where we are right now. We are clearly on a 6 plan. Nothing we can do about it now unfortunately.
I just hope that people will like me
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
4/25/2007  2:43 PM
Posted by TheGame:

IT's draft strategy has been to pick proven college players (other than Ariza). He does not really draft on potential but rather on performance.

You have it completely backwards. Isiah picks on potential, specifically athletic potential. Frye was the exception. That's because he was a lottery pick and Isiah couldn't just base it on athleticism but basketball skills too. That was a failure.

Nate, Lee, Balkman and Collins weren't standout collegiate players.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
4/25/2007  2:48 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TheGame:

IT's draft strategy has been to pick proven college players (other than Ariza). He does not really draft on potential but rather on performance.

You have it completely backwards. Isiah picks on potential, specifically athletic potential. Frye was the exception. That's because he was a lottery pick and Isiah couldn't just base it on athleticism but basketball skills too. That was a failure.

Nate, Lee, Balkman and Collins weren't standout collegiate players.

Balkman was the MVP of the NIT twice, Nate was a star at Washington, and Lee was a well-regarding college player. I am not talking about performance in terms of necessarily being an all-american player. I am talking about performance in terms having shown that you can produce against solid college competition. IT generally is not going for the unknown foreign player or unknown high school (I guess now freshman) player because they have potential. He is going after the guy that proved against college competition that he could play at a high level, regardless of whether that player was necessarily an elite all-american player.

[Edited by - thegame on 04-25-2007 2:49 PM]
Trust the Process
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
4/25/2007  3:01 PM
"Balkman was the MVP of the NIT twice, Nate was a star at Washington, and Lee was a well-regarding college player."

Can't you use this to describe everyone in the draft? I guarantee that everyone that gets drafted this year will be an "MVP" or a "star" or "well-regarded"

I do not question his draft ability. He's been okay with it. My fear is not actual pick. But how he uses these "assets" that he has acquired. Remember Trevor Ariza became Steve Francis. That's what scares me. I think Isiah can get us a good player with this pick. But will that player be a fit for a marbury led team that is in desperate need of a playoff appearacnce and win today. Or will the pick be based on our obvious to most of us, 6 YEAR PLAN.

[Edited by - bippity10 on 25-04-2007 3:02 PM]
I just hope that people will like me
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
4/25/2007  3:11 PM
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TheGame:

IT's draft strategy has been to pick proven college players (other than Ariza). He does not really draft on potential but rather on performance.

You have it completely backwards. Isiah picks on potential, specifically athletic potential. Frye was the exception. That's because he was a lottery pick and Isiah couldn't just base it on athleticism but basketball skills too. That was a failure.

Nate, Lee, Balkman and Collins weren't standout collegiate players.

Balkman was the MVP of the NIT twice, Nate was a star at Washington, and Lee was a well-regarding college player. I am not talking about performance in terms of necessarily being an all-american player. I am talking about performance in terms having shown that you can produce against solid college competition. IT generally is not going for the unknown foreign player or unknown high school (I guess now freshman) player because they have potential. He is going after the guy that proved against college competition that he could play at a high level, regardless of whether that player was necessarily an elite all-american player.

[Edited by - thegame on 04-25-2007 2:49 PM]

Balkman was coming off the bench as a senior for the Gamecocks. And it was the NIT.

Brandon Roy was a star at Washington. Nate was a nice player and oddity.

Lee was well regarded but mostly for his athletic ability.

Like Bip said, you can say that everyone in the draft was "well regarded". The problem is that this franchise needs standout players. Isiah has yet to acquire one via draft, trade or free agency.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
4/25/2007  3:22 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TheGame:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TheGame:

IT's draft strategy has been to pick proven college players (other than Ariza). He does not really draft on potential but rather on performance.

You have it completely backwards. Isiah picks on potential, specifically athletic potential. Frye was the exception. That's because he was a lottery pick and Isiah couldn't just base it on athleticism but basketball skills too. That was a failure.

Nate, Lee, Balkman and Collins weren't standout collegiate players.

Balkman was the MVP of the NIT twice, Nate was a star at Washington, and Lee was a well-regarding college player. I am not talking about performance in terms of necessarily being an all-american player. I am talking about performance in terms having shown that you can produce against solid college competition. IT generally is not going for the unknown foreign player or unknown high school (I guess now freshman) player because they have potential. He is going after the guy that proved against college competition that he could play at a high level, regardless of whether that player was necessarily an elite all-american player.

[Edited by - thegame on 04-25-2007 2:49 PM]

Balkman was coming off the bench as a senior for the Gamecocks. And it was the NIT.

Brandon Roy was a star at Washington. Nate was a nice player and oddity.

Lee was well regarded but mostly for his athletic ability.

Like Bip said, you can say that everyone in the draft was "well regarded". The problem is that this franchise needs standout players. Isiah has yet to acquire one via draft, trade or free agency.

Well, to get the players you are talking about you need a lottery pick, which we don't have. There are no college standouts at the end of the draft. My statements were geared toward drafting in the later part of the 1st round when you have the choice of going for some unproven guy that has potential or for a proven college player that might not have as high a ceiling. IT has been picking guys that have already shown they can do something consistently on the college level, rather than going for the guy with just potential.
Trust the Process
NYKBocker
Posts: 38586
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
4/25/2007  3:32 PM
If Thabeet falls to 23 do you scoop him up?
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34114
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

4/25/2007  3:46 PM
Posted by NYKBocker:

If Thabeet falls to 23 do you scoop him up?

I think you have to... considering the Knicks are short on impact players. Thabeet has the potential to eventually be that, but Isiah won't draft him because, well, he needs to draft players that will contribute immediately to save his ass and he would have to admit Frye, Curry and James were all mistakes.

The more interesting question is with Thadeus Young because he has the potential to be a a stud at the SF position for years and years to come.


[Edited by - supremecommander on 04-25-2007 3:46 PM]
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34114
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

4/25/2007  3:47 PM
The guy I really want is Derrick Byars... I haven't seen anyone mention him yet.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/25/2007  3:50 PM
we should trade the pick for a future one, or take a high risk, high reward euro guy and stash him for another year.

we don't have any spots for more late first round picks.

we need a new starting pg, sg, sf, and pf long term.

we need big time two way talent. pick #23 is only going to challenge minutes of other young players on the squad. at some point we must consolidate.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30365
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
4/25/2007  4:26 PM
Balkman was the MVP of the NIT and MVP of I think the Chi pre draft camp.
David Lee was the MVP of the Chi pre draft camp as well.
Nate Robinson was a boom or bust type of pick.

What they all had in common that Isiah was looking for was they all hustled, and brought energy. In the Frye, Lee, Robinson draft we had no depth behind Marbury & Crawford and people complained how Marbury was to much a half court PG. Nate was brought in to change the pace, be a pest on defense which he has the potential to be when a guard is bring the ball up the court. Make hustle player. Lee was MVP of the draft camp and wow'd Isiah with his intangibles there.

Balkman was said to be EVERYWHERE doing EVERYTHING in the pre draft camp. So after Isiah watched film of him being the MVP of NIT then watched him personally as the MVP of the pre draft workout and saw some handling ability to bring the ball up the court and driving ability to go along with his rebounding, shotblocking, defense. He fell in love.

As for Frye Isiah saw a lot of skill and liked his upbringing. He felt Fyre would be a good player right away and throughout his career.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
Pick 23 according to mock drafts 4/24

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy