[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

OT - Someone please explain to me the difference between this and Imus.
Topic LOCKED
Author Thread
NYKresurrection
Posts: 20561
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/23/2006
Member: #1230

4/12/2007  8:15 AM
CBS says Couric unaware video essay plagiarized By Steve Gorman
Wed Apr 11, 5:50 PM ET



LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - "CBS Evening News" anchor Katie Couric may vividly recall her first library card, but the network says she was unaware that her online video essay about the virtues of libraries was largely a work of plagiarism.


CBS News said this week the April 4 installment of "Katie Couric's Notebook" consisted mostly of passages lifted verbatim from a Wall Street Journal column by Jeffrey Zaslow that was published in March.

The producer responsible for Couric's piece was fired on Monday night, hours after the Journal contacted CBS News to complain, network spokeswoman Sandy Genelius said on Tuesday.

The essay was immediately removed from the CBS News Web site, and a correction was posted in its place. The network did not identify the producer who was fired.

Although the text for the minute-long video was written in first person -- introduced by Couric with the line, "I still remember when I got my first library card" -- Couric did not compose the piece herself and was unaware that much of it was plagiarized, Genelius said.

"She was stunned, and very upset," Genelius said on Wednesday. "It's the same reaction we all had."

The mishap comes as CBS continues to lag in third place in the network news ratings, behind ABC and NBC, seven months after Couric's much-ballyhooed debut as the first woman solo anchor of a major U.S. evening newscast -- for a salary reportedly worth $15 million a year.

Couric, who gained celebrity status co-hosting America's top-ranked morning show "Today" on NBC for 15 years, has had no comment of her own on the plagiarism episode.

Some Internet-based media watchers took issue with the language CBS used in its correction, which acknowledged that "much of the material" in Couric's piece "came from Mr. Zaslow" without attribution, but referred to the transgression as "an omission."

"This is a case of plagiarism, not omission," wrote the Web site Regret the Error, which reports on issues of accuracy and ethics in the media.

The author of The Daily Background blog, Arlen Parsa, faulted Couric for letting others write her own commentaries.

Genelius said Couric met with a group of producers weekly to discuss upcoming topics for her "Notebook" video essays, and "she does write some of them herself."

"Sometimes the text is written by the producer," she added. "That's the way television generally works. It's a very collaborative medium."



My point is that Imus produced the greater of 2 evils which not only he, but his producer also made some comments and yet they have a job. This poor schmuck probably was doing what he was told but he was the scapegoat for Katie Curic. CBS didn't hesitate to fire him but Imus gets a suspension and his producer gets nothing.
GOD arose JESUS from the grave !!! Isiah arose the Knicks from their grave !!!
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 80979
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
4/12/2007  10:10 AM
put this in the other Imus thread, thanks.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Topic LOCKED
OT - Someone please explain to me the difference between this and Imus.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy