[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Larry and Isiah whats the difference? Be honest
Author Thread
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/28/2007  10:51 AM
In order to judge the two we have to factor in things to truly evaluate the job that Isiah has done. In comparison in the end you realize that there is no difference, except for more team unity.


What Brown Had Working against him?

-New Players: Curry, Frye, Lee, Nate, Antonio Davis, Richardson
-Out of shape Eddy Curry misses entire training camp, playing much of the season overweight and out of shape
-Q adjusting to a new city and team while going through a vicious public break up
-In season trade losing his only veteran influence AD, and having to find minutes for Rose and Francis, addition of Q Woods

What Isiah had in his favor?-The Knicks were coming off the worst season in franchise history, players looking for new life
-New Players-Jefferies, Balkman, Collins and no in season trades

Where Isiah gets his credit

Marbury resurgence
05-06 16.3pts 6.4ass 2.9rbs 1.0slts 2.62 to’s 45%fg
06-07 15.9pts 5.5ass 2.7rbs 1.2stls 2.41 to’s 42%fg

Curry
05-06 13.6pts 6.0rbs 0.3.ass 0.8blks 0.4spg 2.49to’s 56%fg 63%ft
MIN 26 FGA 597 (72games)

06-07 19.0pts 7.0rbs 0.8ass 0.5blks 0.4spg 3.48to’s 57%fg 59%
MIN 35 FGA 858 (69 games)

So in 10 extra minutes a night, he is averaging 5.4pts grabs 1rb his blk numbers are down somehow, no increase in stls, and his attempts are through the roof. He has taken 261 more shots in three more games, so we all knew what was going on with eddy being force fed all year

Larry did an awful job with his starting lineups, awful no question but isiah has not really come across a great lineup in his scuffling either, Isiah has had to deal with injuries, Larry the same although not as severe.

Larry: Q only played 55 games last year, Marbury 62, Eddy 72, Frye missed 15
Isiah: Q played 49 so far, Marbury hasn’t missed but 2, Eddy has miss a couple, Crawford will miss 24, and Lee with miss 20

Isiah Knicks
-Number 1 in the league in turning the ball over
-Bottom of the league in free throw shooting
-One of the worst defensive teams in the NBA
-One of the more selfish units going

Important Numbers: Losses By 10points
Isiah: 20 Larry 23

So did Larry do an awful job, no one can dispute or disagree, but all this talk about progress and hope is in the fact that eddy played 10 extra minutes shot 261 more times, and marbury has decided to play a little defense, and something that you can't teach hustle Lee and Balkman will help you win games. We know Lee improved, but a lot of that has to do with minutes he gets hustle pts, Isiah never runs anything for him, and Frye, Crawford and Nate digressed more than anyone.

So there is your extension
AUTOADVERT
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/28/2007  11:23 AM
Both guys was equally bad as coaches with the Knicks
Isiah is awful as GM both years.

It is strange to expect changes from grown man.
LB was and will be great coach and nut-head
Isiah was and will be mediocre coach and hareble GM
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/28/2007  11:29 AM
Posted by MS:

In order to judge the two we have to factor in things to truly evaluate the job that Isiah has done. In comparison in the end you realize that there is no difference, except for more team unity.


What Brown Had Working against him?

-New Players: Curry, Frye, Lee, Nate, Antonio Davis, Richardson
-Out of shape Eddy Curry misses entire training camp, playing much of the season overweight and out of shape
-Q adjusting to a new city and team while going through a vicious public break up
-In season trade losing his only veteran influence AD, and having to find minutes for Rose and Francis, addition of Q Woods

What Isiah had in his favor?-The Knicks were coming off the worst season in franchise history, players looking for new life
-New Players-Jefferies, Balkman, Collins and no in season trades

Where Isiah gets his credit

Marbury resurgence
05-06 16.3pts 6.4ass 2.9rbs 1.0slts 2.62 to’s 45%fg
06-07 15.9pts 5.5ass 2.7rbs 1.2stls 2.41 to’s 42%fg

Curry
05-06 13.6pts 6.0rbs 0.3.ass 0.8blks 0.4spg 2.49to’s 56%fg 63%ft
MIN 26 FGA 597 (72games)

06-07 19.0pts 7.0rbs 0.8ass 0.5blks 0.4spg 3.48to’s 57%fg 59%
MIN 35 FGA 858 (69 games)

So in 10 extra minutes a night, he is averaging 5.4pts grabs 1rb his blk numbers are down somehow, no increase in stls, and his attempts are through the roof. He has taken 261 more shots in three more games, so we all knew what was going on with eddy being force fed all year

Larry did an awful job with his starting lineups, awful no question but isiah has not really come across a great lineup in his scuffling either, Isiah has had to deal with injuries, Larry the same although not as severe.

Larry: Q only played 55 games last year, Marbury 62, Eddy 72, Frye missed 15
Isiah: Q played 49 so far, Marbury hasn’t missed but 2, Eddy has miss a couple, Crawford will miss 24, and Lee with miss 20

Isiah Knicks
-Number 1 in the league in turning the ball over
-Bottom of the league in free throw shooting
-One of the worst defensive teams in the NBA
-One of the more selfish units going

Important Numbers: Losses By 10points
Isiah: 20 Larry 23

So did Larry do an awful job, no one can dispute or disagree, but all this talk about progress and hope is in the fact that eddy played 10 extra minutes shot 261 more times, and marbury has decided to play a little defense, and something that you can't teach hustle Lee and Balkman will help you win games. We know Lee improved, but a lot of that has to do with minutes he gets hustle pts, Isiah never runs anything for him, and Frye, Crawford and Nate digressed more than anyone.

So there is your extension

Very reasonable--well-presented post.
RIP Crushalot😞
Nalod
Posts: 72394
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/28/2007  11:33 AM
Cool post.

Also the collective Eastern teams suck more than last year.

And look how much Nay Nate has matured! Frye has Regressed, but Dlee improved! Balky is better for position than Reezy.
efw
Posts: 20669
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2005
Member: #1002

3/28/2007  11:46 AM
I have trouble with the decision to fire Brown because I always think you need time to see things play out. Larry possible could've changed the team over several years. I have a hard time believing he just wanted to get the money and run.

But, when the whole team hates the coach, there's little you can do.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
3/28/2007  11:58 AM
What Brown Had Working against him?
-New Players: Curry, Frye, Lee, Nate, Antonio Davis, Richardson
-Out of shape Eddy Curry misses entire training camp, playing much of the season overweight and out of shape
-Q adjusting to a new city and team while going through a vicious public break up
-In season trade losing his only veteran influence AD, and having to find minutes for Rose and Francis, addition of Q Woods

What Isiah had in his favor?-The Knicks were coming off the worst season in franchise history, players looking for new life
-New Players-Jefferies, Balkman, Collins and no in season trades

You skewed everything right there. Why not also list what LB had working in his favor and what Isiah had working against him?
Both season had their ups and downs. I think the Knicks have had more "problems" this year, I think you left out the suspensions, even though they are not the same as injuries because they have "fault" the effect is the same.

The difference I see is this: Improvement. The Isiah unit was coming together, getting better in increments, and then got blown away by injury, yet still is operating at a higher level than last year's squad. Last year's squad found their mojo, got injured and fell apart again even worse than the early season.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/28/2007  12:00 PM
Important Numbers: Losses By 10points
Isiah: 20 Larry 23

why is that an important #? what difference does it make if they're losing games by 10 points, or 2? a W is a W & a L is a L... you could have saved a lot of time in writing this post by just citing their overall W-L records this season... has there been progress this year compared to last? yes... is that progress justifiable to signing Isiah to an extension is the question... i agree, extending him based on what the team has shown this year is probably not justifiable (& i wish that Dolan would have just brought in Colangelo to make the roster decisions from this point forward), but as far as Isiah the coach is concerned, i think this team respects him for the most part & compared to LB, the differences are night & day in terms of their demeanors... like efw said, when the entire team hates the coach, there's little other choice but to fire him & bring in a coach that they respect.
-In season trade losing his only veteran influence AD, and having to find minutes for Rose and Francis, addition of Q Woods

LB's the one who wanted these moves to be implemented to begin with so saying he had these factors going against him is a little contradictory.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
3/28/2007  12:03 PM
Here's what I think. The same problems we had last year are there this year. LB tried to expose them instead of coaching the team. Isiah tried to coach the team and the result is that he camoflauged for the majority of the season the flaws that the the GM created.

In the end Isiah will rid the team of the same guys that LB wanted gone. These guys aren't dumb. When coaching they can see what the main issues are.
I just hope that people will like me
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/28/2007  12:18 PM
How is that skewing the numbers?

I stated Larry was getting a team, that traded for Curry, and Q, signed James and had to work in three rookies, along with Antonio Davis, Q was added mid season was was Rose and Francis

Isiah added jefferies balkman and collins to the team, and no trades were made so he is at an advantage, especially with three guys coming in a year older, his starting center getting a training camp and not having to play his way into shape during the season. Q was also not dealing with his brothers murder and loses his financee.

THATS FUCKING SKEWING ALRIGHT

TMS it does matter that they are still getting blow out on a consistent basis and a lot of the other games they were getting blown away and than had to come back to get back and ran out of gas its a pattern of being unprofessional.....

AND I DIDN"T INCLUDE THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR IN THE EQUATION

Injuries to Francis allowed Marbury to regain his game, and the brawl allowed us to shorten the rotation and get some wins under our belt, the best ball all season was played when those guys were suspended and francis was out.

That played a part in getting us to where we were, losing crawford doesn't hurt as much as you would think, but not having q and lee sealed it.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/28/2007  12:31 PM
i don't know... i consider each loss equally as disappointing... doesn't matter to me if they lose by 1 or lose by 20... i don't give them a grade.

losing crawford doesn't hurt as much as you would think

so the dropoff in Curry's production isn't proof that Jamal going down has negatively affected this team in your eyes? what's happened to Marbury's game since then? he's reverting back to taking the load upon his shoulders & the team is not benefitting from it whatsoever... losing Q & Lee have really hurt this team, no getting around that, but u can't discount the effect that losing Jamal has had on this team either... w/o him, we have no clutch performer late in games that can still keep Curry into the flow to make a play when u need him to... neither Marbury nor Francis have proven they share any synergy w/Curry in the 2 man game at any point this season, & that's a big concern when Curry's been chosen to be one of your main foundation pieces going forward.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/28/2007  12:35 PM
Posted by efw:

I have trouble with the decision to fire Brown because I always think you need time to see things play out. Larry possible could've changed the team over several years. I have a hard time believing he just wanted to get the money and run.

But, when the whole team hates the coach, there's little you can do.

Why little?
Just disassemble the team.
I guess it was correct thing to do.
And this season is a big argument in favor of this.






[Edited by - arkrud on 03-28-2007 12:35 PM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
3/28/2007  12:38 PM
You know I hate Crawford and here is why eddy is a lump of **** and plays zero defense, he is selfish with the ball and doesn't know how to pass

Jamal plays zero defense takes awful shots, starts the transition offense many times with a quick shot or a bad decision. He makes life easier for Eddy sure but, neither of them play defense and they are giving up more than they score 90% of the time and their games led to others getting open shots.

If we had Q and Lee we could go with this lineup

Marbury/Collins
Q/Nate
Balkman/Jefferies
Lee/Rose
Curry/Frye

I think we would be in many more games and its a shame that q and lee had to go down because you would have seen a vast improvement out there, especially with more acitve players in there with eddy. And Jamals worth is only in the last 5 minutes of the game which is very important I know but he does more than enough to insure your fighting your way back into games
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/28/2007  12:43 PM
Jamal plays zero defense takes awful shots, starts the transition offense many times with a quick shot or a bad decision.

& yet you wanna have Nate backing up Q at the SG off the bench? how is he a better option? & i'd MUCH rather have Q at the 3 & Jamal at the 2 right now than have Francis & Jefferies starting there, i'll tell u that much.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
3/28/2007  1:22 PM
One difference is that Isiah can control his bladder.

https:// It's not so hard.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
3/28/2007  1:28 PM
One difference is that Isiah can control his bladder.

I guess you did not see the puddle after Marbury was goal-tended.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
3/28/2007  4:49 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

One difference is that Isiah can control his bladder.

Looks like it is the only thing he can control now...
So why he likes it?
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Larry and Isiah whats the difference? Be honest

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy