[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

If Cap Management/Flexibility Is The 2yr Goal
Author Thread
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

3/25/2007  2:32 AM
Then players like Rashard Lewis, Vince Carter, Ray Allen, Jermaine O'neal, even K.G. are off limits ********!
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
AUTOADVERT
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
3/25/2007  2:43 AM
It's not.......................
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

3/25/2007  2:44 AM
Posted by Anji:

It's not.......................

So Grunwald was lying to the public?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
3/25/2007  3:05 AM
He wasn't..............
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

3/25/2007  9:32 AM
Posted by Anji:

He wasn't..............

So what did he mean by informing the public focussing on the cap will be a priority in 2yrs?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/25/2007  9:38 AM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Anji:

He wasn't..............

So what did he mean by informing the public focussing on the cap will be a priority in 2yrs?
They've been saying payroll was a serious concern since early in the Layden days. They just don't want to *admit* to ignoring the the salary cap.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 03-25-2007 09:39 AM]
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
3/25/2007  9:44 AM
It is an illusion. The reality is that when Marbury, Francis, and Rose's deals come off the books, the Knicks will need to resign Lee, Frye, and Nate and then the next year will have to resign Balkman and probably Curry who has an option for one of those years. With Q, Crawford, and JJ2 still on the books, we are not likely to be under the cap anytime soon. Trades, drafting, and moves like signing Morris are the only way this team is going to improve.
Trust the Process
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/25/2007  10:41 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Anji:

He wasn't..............

So what did he mean by informing the public focussing on the cap will be a priority in 2yrs?
They've been saying payroll was a serious concern since early in the Layden days. They just don't want to *admit* to ignoring the the salary cap.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 03-25-2007 09:39 AM]

No they haven't. If anything, they've said they have to work with what they have, but they never said anything about getting under the cap. In fact, I vaguely vaguely remember Isiah saying something like "It's just not an option."

Anyway, if this is true, then Marbury is NOT getting a big extension. However, I'll believe that when I see it. I think his trade value will be up by the next deadline and it will only increase. We're not getting terribly far anytime soon. Time to consider being good to him and shop him to maybe a contender.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/25/2007  10:50 AM
I remember them talking about reducing payroll for several years. I thought they even said at the press conference when Isiah was first hired that they planned to reduce payroll. I'm doing some yahoo searches with things like "James Dolan" and "payroll" but I just get like 100,000 sources and they don't have quotes from him. I'll see if I can find anything. You're right that Isiah would say getting under the cap isn't an option. But I thought there were contradictory statements about trying to be responsible salary-wise.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/25/2007  11:06 AM
Well I thought they had talked about reducing payroll for a while but I can't find any quotes. Maybe I was mistaken.
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/25/2007  11:13 AM
Definitely never said that, and DJ even talked to him one on one, and said Isiah had no intentions of doing that.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

3/25/2007  11:19 AM
Isiah said something about salaries needing to be more commensurate with talent.

Isiah came in knowing what fans hated about Layden and the team and he wanted to "give the team back to the fans." (remember he spoke about riding the subways to talk to fans and to get a feel for the city) I'm sure he was speaking to our dislike of bad deals to guys like Houston, Shandon, Eisley, Van Horn, Spoon, etc.

But then he goes and gets Marbury, Hardaway, Francis, MoT, Snacks, Malik, Jalen, Skinny, etc, and trades draft picks like they were trading cards.

Isiah giveth and then taketh away... it's all part of the plan.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/25/2007  11:27 AM
I guess I was just wrong then! Sorry.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/25/2007  11:49 AM
Posted by BlueSeats:

Isiah said something about salaries needing to be more commensurate with talent.

Isiah came in knowing what fans hated about Layden and the team and he wanted to "give the team back to the fans." (remember he spoke about riding the subways to talk to fans and to get a feel for the city) I'm sure he was speaking to our dislike of bad deals to guys like Houston, Shandon, Eisley, Van Horn, Spoon, etc.

But then he goes and gets Marbury, Hardaway, Francis, MoT, Snacks, Malik, Jalen, Skinny, etc, and trades draft picks like they were trading cards.

Isiah giveth and then taketh away... it's all part of the plan.

OK how about keeping up with current events. It's funny how this guy has only been here for about 3.5 years and the last 2 YEARS he's been working to make the team younger and I think he's been pretty successful in doing that. Many of the moves he's made have led to us being able to have the young players we have now. You can't just lump them all together and leave out the fact that we have replaced those players with better young players. Have there been some bad signings and trades, yeah. Still the team at it's core has a LOT of young players who can be part of the solution.

More importantly the cap situation is for signing a big FA. There has to be a target in mind 2 years down the line. I don't think it is the highest priority to be worried about that right now. Who knows what this team will be like by then and what our needs may be. Right now he's still focused on adding good young talent. Morris is one more guy and then we'll see who he drafts. A lot can happen between now and 2 years when our cap number can come down.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
3/25/2007  11:51 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Anji:

He wasn't..............

So what did he mean by informing the public focussing on the cap will be a priority in 2yrs?
They've been saying payroll was a serious concern since early in the Layden days. They just don't want to *admit* to ignoring the the salary cap.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 03-25-2007 09:39 AM]

The hell are you talking about????
All they are saying being 50-90million dolars over the cap without a superstar is bad. That doesn't make KG, VC, Lewis, JOneil off limit don't you think????
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

3/25/2007  12:16 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by BlueSeats:

Isiah said something about salaries needing to be more commensurate with talent.

Isiah came in knowing what fans hated about Layden and the team and he wanted to "give the team back to the fans." (remember he spoke about riding the subways to talk to fans and to get a feel for the city) I'm sure he was speaking to our dislike of bad deals to guys like Houston, Shandon, Eisley, Van Horn, Spoon, etc.

But then he goes and gets Marbury, Hardaway, Francis, MoT, Snacks, Malik, Jalen, Skinny, etc, and trades draft picks like they were trading cards.

Isiah giveth and then taketh away... it's all part of the plan.

OK how about keeping up with current events. It's funny how this guy has only been here for about 3.5 years and the last 2 YEARS he's been working to make the team younger and I think he's been pretty successful in doing that. Many of the moves he's made have led to us being able to have the young players we have now. You can't just lump them all together and leave out the fact that we have replaced those players with better young players. Have there been some bad signings and trades, yeah. Still the team at it's core has a LOT of young players who can be part of the solution.

More importantly the cap situation is for signing a big FA. There has to be a target in mind 2 years down the line. I don't think it is the highest priority to be worried about that right now. Who knows what this team will be like by then and what our needs may be. Right now he's still focused on adding good young talent. Morris is one more guy and then we'll see who he drafts. A lot can happen between now and 2 years when our cap number can come down.

Dude, do you think we're adding no new contracts and not resigning our youth between now and 2010 or not?

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/25/2007  12:19 PM
never once did they say they would get UNDER the cap. and isiah told me point blank that he wanted to be over the cap.

cap management is a foreign concept to the garden, no matter what they say.

$10 mil over is the same as $50 mil over in terms of signing free agents. so it's moot.
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
3/25/2007  12:26 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

never once did they say they would get UNDER the cap. and isiah told me point blank that he wanted to be over the cap.

cap management is a foreign concept to the garden, no matter what they say.

$10 mil over is the same as $50 mil over in terms of signing free agents. so it's moot.

The only cap management that is going to be done is getting from $60 million over the cap to about $10-20 million over the cap. That's it. Once we get to that point, IT will probably try to see if he can use our greater resources to trade for a superstar that is not working out on another team by using expiring contracts and our willingness to take on salary. Dolan has stopped that tactic with the payroll over $100 million, but I think that once it gets back down to about $80 million, Dolan might be willing to allow IT to make such a move.


[Edited by - thegame on 03-25-2007 12:27 PM]
Trust the Process
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/25/2007  12:29 PM
Posted by Anji:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by Anji:

He wasn't..............

So what did he mean by informing the public focussing on the cap will be a priority in 2yrs?
They've been saying payroll was a serious concern since early in the Layden days. They just don't want to *admit* to ignoring the the salary cap.

[Edited by - bonn1997 on 03-25-2007 09:39 AM]

The hell are you talking about????
All they are saying being 50-90million dolars over the cap without a superstar is bad. That doesn't make KG, VC, Lewis, JOneil off limit don't you think????

I don't know...I'm just a toll worker!
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

3/25/2007  12:30 PM
Nixluva, Anji, and Misterearl please translate for us when representatives from management speak to the public.

Like when ISAYUGH says he made a trade for a bloated contract to use it as an asset and then buys out that asset what did he mean?

Like when Dolan says he'll give ISAYUGH a full yr before he offers him an extension but then does it with 20gms left into the season what did he mean?

Like when Grunwald said the cap will be addressed 2yrs from now but that's not really the case because Vince Carter was/maybe still is a viable trade option what does he mean?


Please tell us all because we're all too ignorant.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
If Cap Management/Flexibility Is The 2yr Goal

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy