below are the top 5 minute getters for the knicks and their production in wins and losses

jc (games missed: 0)
w: 39 mins, 19.1 pts, 15.1 fga (41%), 6.0 3fga (36%), 5.2 fta (85%), 4.7 asts, 2.7 rebs
l: 37 mins, 17.0 pts, 15.4 fga (39%), 5.2 3fa (28%), 4.3 fta (83%), 4.3 asts, 2.4 rebs

steph (games missed: 1)
w: 37 mins, 17.0 pts, 11.6 fga (46%), 4.2 3fga (41%), 6.0 fta (77%), 6.2 asts, 3.3 rebs
l: 36 mins, 12.4 pts, 11.4 fga (37%), 3.2 3fga (28%), 4.1 fta (74%), 4.8 asts, 2.2 rebs

q (games missed: 15, 7-8 without him)
w: 36 mins, 15.2 pts, 11.9 fga (46%), 6.3 3fga (42%), 2.4 fta (68%), 2.7 asts, 7.3 rebs
l: 32 mins, 11.0 pts, 10.4 fga (38%), 4.2 3fga (31%), 2.4 fta (69%), 2.0 asts, 7.2 rebs

lee (games missed: 3)
w: 32 mins, 11.6 pts, 6.8 fga (60%), 4.0 fta (85%), 2.4 asts, 11.6 rebs
l: 30 mins, 10.8 pts, 7.3 fga (61%), 2.4 fta (76%), 1.3 asts, 10.0 rebs

eddy (games missed: 1)
w: 36 mins, 21.7 pts, 12.1 fga (66%), 8.6 fta (66%), 7.8 rebs, 0.6 blks
l: 34 mins, 18.0 pts, 12.6 fga (54%), 7.4 fta (59%), 6.5 rebs, 0.5 blks

[Edited by - djsunyc on 02-28-2007 12:48 PM]

we do look like a team that lives and dies by its 3s- that's the biggest difference between wins and losses across players. not a huge difference in attempts, just percentages: 8% for jamal, 13% for steph, 11% for Q. steph seems to have the most overall variance in points and assists between Ws and Ls- would have guessed jamal.

in conclusion, obviously if eddy and lee shot more 3 pointers we'd have won a few more games.

Posted by Solace:

I don't think these stats show much except to say that each player plays a little better/more efficiently in games we win.... not exactly a surprising result.

Steph has a 5 point spread.

When he tries, we're a good team.

Posted by VDesai:

Marbury should be able to do 17 and 6 in his sleep.

now that JC is out, he probably will.

Itis not too much difference for this players.
Looks like we are winnng when the rest of players are playing art leat somehow OK