[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

man if there is anyway to get rashard lewis for frye and nate i hope they consider it
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/21/2007  1:34 PM
i know they may be high on frye??? but come on he is NOT the next tim Duncan--he's something of a Brian Cook Lewis is bonafide young tall star.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
2/21/2007  1:36 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

i know they may be high on frye??? but come on he is NOT the next tim Duncan--he's something of a Brian Cook Lewis is bonafide young tall star.

I agree Briggs. If there is a Nate/Frye for Rashard deal on the table, you have to do it.

Rashards scoring capabilities on this team would absolutely huge. I know some are saying this team doesn't need more offense but they are wrong we need more VERSATILE offense and that is something that Rashard would bring to the table. His defense isn't great and it's not bad either, you gotta pull the trigger on this deal because he would help this team extraordinarily.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
NYKBocker
Posts: 38581
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
2/21/2007  1:39 PM
This would be a good move. We can then move DLee in the 4 spot.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
2/21/2007  1:39 PM
Its too bad we don't have expiring deals to use perhaps we could have move crawford, nate and an expiring and got lewis and a bad contract in the process without giving up frye, maybe even including a number 1
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
2/21/2007  2:10 PM
I would do Crawford/Nate/Frye

Not the biggest Lewis fan but that would also make us a bigger team. More Lee/Balkman to go with Rashard replacing Q at SF (who then starts at SG)
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/21/2007  2:13 PM
Posted by fishmike:

I would do Crawford/Nate/Frye

Not the biggest Lewis fan but that would also make us a bigger team. More Lee/Balkman to go with Rashard replacing Q at SF (who then starts at SG)

I wouldnt do Crawford. Right now Seattle honestly could be looking @ nothing. I think they can move Wilcox's salary to Chicago for Brown--bring In frye @ PF and they can actually use nate--and probably malik rose

if the team wants to get better--they certainly shouldnt be obsessed with holding to their guns.
RIP Crushalot😞
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/21/2007  4:05 PM
I think most everyone would make the deal if Frye/Nate were the principals. I can't see that happening though.
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510
2/21/2007  4:08 PM
I would like to get back wilcox or sene if we r trading frye.. but Lewis is a good player stat wise
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
2/21/2007  4:11 PM
If we could get wilcox in that package for frye, nate, crawford for lewis i would do it in a heartbeat.

I hate to lose nate and Wilcox is a bonehead but i could see him being valuable to maybe a team like the suns looking to deal Marion to save room in the offseason. Its a long shot but they have to restructure their payroll and Wilcox would just have to run the floor in that offense.....

We would be a good team if we could make that deal......

Marbury/Francis
Q/Balkman
Lewis/Jefferies
Lee/Wilcox
Curry
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
2/21/2007  4:58 PM
They have t take Q, we have too many SmallForwards.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/22/2007  2:10 AM
frye/nate/malik for shard makes sense. but it doesn't seem like seattle wants to make a move. I don't know. frye has been terribly disappointing this season and clearly doesn't work with Eddy. either Frye or Eddy has to go and we know Eddy isn't going anywhere.

edit: maybe if we throw in two unprotected first rounders?

[Edited by - crzymdups on 02-22-2007 02:10 AM]
¿ △ ?
« Reply To Topic
man if there is anyway to get rashard lewis for frye and nate i hope they consider it
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy