Posted by Allanfan20:
It depends. Our excuse for going in was to find weapons of mass destruction and turn Iraq into a democracy. (Or so that's the vibe I get)
We found no WOMD, and I personally think that you can't tame that society because I think there's just way too much chaos that has gone on there, from civilians, terrorists and Iraqi soldiers turning on us as well as their own people. In which case, I think it's a lost cause.
However, if we just leave, the Taliban regroups, Al-Quaida comes out from hiding and ultra chaos is brought back in that area and could spread widely.
It's honestly just way too difficult for me to pass judgement on this. That area is screwed with or without us.
I hear you. In the interest of full disclosure, I'll acknowledge (as you probably figured out by now) that I'm a liberal democrat and I support Obama. (I might vote for Gore ahead of him in the primary if Gore were to run, though.)
I don't think there is a solution to the problems in Iraq. There's a humanitarian crisis in Iraq that we (really the Bush administration) sparked. I'm not gonna pretend to have the foreign policy expertise to be able to evaluate the policy options in Iraq (and I'd be surprised if anyone else on this board truly had that degree of knowledge).