Posted by babyKnicks:

coaches game plan around him, to me that's an indicator that they will vote him in more than the fans.

Posted by babyKnicks:

coaches game plan around him, to me that's an indicator that they will vote him in more than the fans.

Posted by babyKnicks:

coaches game planning around marbury "often" is different from coaches game planning around Curry ALWAYS.


[Edited by - babyknicks on 01-26-2007 11:02 AM]

Posted by Masterplan:

Posted by kam77:

Masterplan - Check our record when Eddy Scores 20

don't know, what is it?

what about when he doesn't, though? does the other coach's gameplan have anything to do with it? or is it his own limitations? or are you assuming that 20 ppg will become the norm?


whatever selection of games you want to judge the team on, overall we're a hair above .400. bottom line is as long as curry is the go-to-guy on a bad team he doesn't deserve many accolades- goes for most players on the team to theri own degree. my main point wasn't to knock curry. to reiterate:

the best way to silence critics is to win.

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by Masterplan:

Posted by kam77:

Masterplan - Check our record when Eddy Scores 20

don't know, what is it?

what about when he doesn't, though? does the other coach's gameplan have anything to do with it? or is it his own limitations? or are you assuming that 20 ppg will become the norm?


whatever selection of games you want to judge the team on, overall we're a hair above .400. bottom line is as long as curry is the go-to-guy on a bad team he doesn't deserve many accolades- goes for most players on the team to theri own degree. my main point wasn't to knock curry. to reiterate:

the best way to silence critics is to win.

I think the record is 13-11 when he does. 5-15 when he doesn't, this taking into account he could be scoring 17,18,19 pts in those losses(15). It's decent but nothing to go hog wild over. You bring up a good point though, If he's a All-Star/Superstar talent does the team still win when he doesn't score 20pts. If they do then that means he's playing a huge part in making his teammates better. It also suggests that if he doesn't score 20pts then it's practically a lock opponents will beat this team. He may be the most valuable player but it's debateable. Guess what the team is 13-11 when Lee double doubles.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 01-26-2007 11:08 AM]

Posted by Bonn1997:

Posted by TrueBlue:

Posted by Masterplan:

Posted by kam77:

Masterplan - Check our record when Eddy Scores 20

don't know, what is it?

what about when he doesn't, though? does the other coach's gameplan have anything to do with it? or is it his own limitations? or are you assuming that 20 ppg will become the norm?


whatever selection of games you want to judge the team on, overall we're a hair above .400. bottom line is as long as curry is the go-to-guy on a bad team he doesn't deserve many accolades- goes for most players on the team to theri own degree. my main point wasn't to knock curry. to reiterate:

the best way to silence critics is to win.

I think the record is 13-11 when he does. 5-15 when he doesn't, this taking into account he could be scoring 17,18,19 pts in those losses(15). It's decent but nothing to go hog wild over. You bring up a good point though, If he's a All-Star/Superstar talent does the team still win when he doesn't score 20pts. If they do then that means he's playing a huge part in making his teammates better. It also suggests that if he doesn't score 20pts then it's practically a lock opponents will beat this team. He may be the most valuable player but it's debateable. Guess what the team is 13-11 when Lee double doubles.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 01-26-2007 11:08 AM]

You also tend to score more points against bad teams that you're likely to beat anyway. I bet for most players on the team, the record is better when they do than when they don't score 20 points. Nothing shocking.