[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

knicks catch a break, redd out 4 to 6 weeks
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
1/8/2007  8:09 PM
Redd Out Four To Six Weeks
8th January, 2007 - 7:20 pm
Journal Sentinel -

The Milwaukee Bucks announced Monday afternoon that forward Michael Redd is expected to be sidelined from four to six weeks with a strained left patellar tendon that he suffered in last Saturday's game against Cleveland at the Bradley Center.

Redd underwent evaluation and further testing by team orthopedic physician, John Heinrich, on Monday. Redd will continue rehabilitation during the time he is out. [READ]

no charlie v, no redd for the game @mil on the 28th.
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/8/2007  9:19 PM
???

http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/boxscore?gid=2006120918

I mean, it's a break in that it helps their playoff push because Milwaukee is really hurting, but Milwaukee couldn't even try to contain Curry last time they played.
¿ △ ?
NYKresurrection
Posts: 20561
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/23/2006
Member: #1230
1/8/2007  10:16 PM
Sixers = no AI or Webber ( trade & buyout )
Char = no BK ( ankle )
Jersey = no RJ ( ankle )
Miami = no Shaq ( knee )
Mil = no Redd ( knee )
GOD arose JESUS from the grave !!! Isiah arose the Knicks from their grave !!!
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
1/8/2007  10:21 PM
The Knicks have been without Q (who many of us called their best player over the first few months of the season) for the last few weeks. It all evens out.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/8/2007  10:39 PM
Posted by NYKresurrection:

Sixers = no AI or Webber ( trade & buyout )
Char = no BK ( ankle )
Jersey = no RJ ( ankle )
Miami = no Shaq ( knee )
Mil = no Redd ( knee )


did the Sixers really buy out Webber? I missed that.
¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/8/2007  10:39 PM
Posted by Rich:

The Knicks have been without Q (who many of us called their best player over the first few months of the season) for the last few weeks. It all evens out.

Now you're just making excuses!!!
¿ △ ?
Swishfm3
Posts: 23357
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
1/9/2007  8:51 AM
Didn't the Knicks already beat the Bucks WITH Redd?
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
1/9/2007  10:33 AM
Posted by Swishfm3:

Didn't the Knicks already beat the Bucks WITH Redd?

Does it not make the Knicks job easier without the Bucks best player? What's the complaint about the *fact* that the Bucks are a better team with Michael Redd? Sheesh.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/9/2007  11:01 AM
I just wanna know was it a break when Philly caught us running a 7 man rotation in a 4th game back to back in 5 days?????
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
1/9/2007  11:15 AM
Posted by Anji:

I just wanna know was it a break when Philly caught us running a 7 man rotation in a 4th game back to back in 5 days?????

Not so much, at least when talking about the suspended players. We were missing players who are mearly irrelevant to our success. Milwaukee will be missing its BEST player. Huge difference. So far its been shown that us being without Nate, Jeffries and Mardy helped remove some of our glut.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27773
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/9/2007  12:36 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Anji:

I just wanna know was it a break when Philly caught us running a 7 man rotation in a 4th game back to back in 5 days?????

Not so much, at least when talking about the suspended players. We were missing players who are mearly irrelevant to our success. Milwaukee will be missing its BEST player. Huge difference. So far its been shown that us being without Nate, Jeffries and Mardy helped remove some of our glut.

Dude, we had 7 players and were playing multiple OT games back to back. It is the same for all intents and purposes, our guys were exhausted.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/9/2007  1:04 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Anji:

I just wanna know was it a break when Philly caught us running a 7 man rotation in a 4th game back to back in 5 days?????

Not so much, at least when talking about the suspended players. We were missing players who are mearly irrelevant to our success. Milwaukee will be missing its BEST player. Huge difference. So far its been shown that us being without Nate, Jeffries and Mardy helped remove some of our glut.

Dude, we had 7 players and were playing multiple OT games back to back. It is the same for all intents and purposes, our guys were exhausted.

Yeah, that comes across as doing anything possible to never cut any slack for the Knicks team. Q-Rich was out and is certainly important to this team's success. Just having depth so guys don't play 55 min on back to back to back games is kind of important too!
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
1/9/2007  2:00 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Anji:

I just wanna know was it a break when Philly caught us running a 7 man rotation in a 4th game back to back in 5 days?????

Not so much, at least when talking about the suspended players. We were missing players who are mearly irrelevant to our success. Milwaukee will be missing its BEST player. Huge difference. So far its been shown that us being without Nate, Jeffries and Mardy helped remove some of our glut.

Dude, we had 7 players and were playing multiple OT games back to back. It is the same for all intents and purposes, our guys were exhausted.

Yeah, that comes across as doing anything possible to never cut any slack for the Knicks team. Q-Rich was out and is certainly important to this team's success. Just having depth so guys don't play 55 min on back to back to back games is kind of important too!

I was responding to the fact that our suspended players are irrelevant to our success. Q is a good piece, but not one of our top three players (in fact our winning percentage is as good or better without him), and yes our team was tired, but exhausted is an embarassing exaggeration. I still say its a completely different scenario. To make excuses for a game that was what... two weeks ago, when we got creamed, is silly.

Anyway, its amazing that someone saying that it should help us that Milwaukee is missing its top guy (is it not true?) has been denied by posters and now its been turned around to relate to us. Gimme a break. If Curry goes down, then we can talk about parallels.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
nykshaknbake
Posts: 22247
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/15/2003
Member: #492
1/9/2007  2:59 PM
I think it was a big break for Philly. YOu catch a team with exhausted starters and a rotation cut by a third....they were exhausted. By your logic as long as you have your top three players you could get two more from the NBADL and play everyone 48 min and it wouldn't really be a big disadvantage.
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Anji:

I just wanna know was it a break when Philly caught us running a 7 man rotation in a 4th game back to back in 5 days?????

Not so much, at least when talking about the suspended players. We were missing players who are mearly irrelevant to our success. Milwaukee will be missing its BEST player. Huge difference. So far its been shown that us being without Nate, Jeffries and Mardy helped remove some of our glut.

Dude, we had 7 players and were playing multiple OT games back to back. It is the same for all intents and purposes, our guys were exhausted.

Yeah, that comes across as doing anything possible to never cut any slack for the Knicks team. Q-Rich was out and is certainly important to this team's success. Just having depth so guys don't play 55 min on back to back to back games is kind of important too!

I was responding to the fact that our suspended players are irrelevant to our success. Q is a good piece, but not one of our top three players (in fact our winning percentage is as good or better without him), and yes our team was tired, but exhausted is an embarassing exaggeration. I still say its a completely different scenario. To make excuses for a game that was what... two weeks ago, when we got creamed, is silly.

Anyway, its amazing that someone saying that it should help us that Milwaukee is missing its top guy (is it not true?) has been denied by posters and now its been turned around to relate to us. Gimme a break. If Curry goes down, then we can talk about parallels.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
1/9/2007  3:06 PM
Posted by nykshaknbake:

I think it was a big break for Philly. YOu catch a team with exhausted starters and a rotation cut by a third....they were exhausted. By your logic as long as you have your top three players you could get two more from the NBADL and play everyone 48 min and it wouldn't really be a big disadvantage.

Nope. That's putting words in my mouth. I was saying that we had 6 of our top 7 players by my estimation, and were maybe missing our 5th best player. I just don't think that's huge. The being tired is a concern, but every team plays back to backs. We had almost all of our big minute guys, who play big minutes regardless of 7 men or 12 men on the roster. If we're going to hold that as a standard for an excuse, then we should excuse every team that comes off a back to back that plays us. I don't see you jumping to defend other teams coming off back-to-backs. Gimme a break.

By the logic I've seen in this thread, Milwaukee is an NBDL team and that's why losing their best player is irrelevant. They're NBDL level since they couldn't handle Curry, and this was a win either way, so they should just forfeit before it starts. That's just following the logic that has been presented in this thread.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
izybx
Posts: 22366
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 10/16/2006
Member: #1178
USA
1/9/2007  3:50 PM
Its always bad to lose players. If your the Knicks it hurts. If your the opposing team it hurts them. I really dont see how anybody can assert one without conceding the other.
Beat the Evil Empire. BEAT MIAMI
GoNyGoNyGo
Posts: 23559
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/29/2003
Member: #411
USA
1/10/2007  8:10 AM
Now if only someone can guard Mo Williams the Bucks version of the Knick Killer.
« Reply To Topic
knicks catch a break, redd out 4 to 6 weeks
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy