yes we showed heart and guts in these--refuse to lose ok some of these games make me proud

yet doesn't it mask TREMENDOUS flaw? it is good that we have shown it at times and played with guts

but it is likely a mask

we rely so heavily on guards who can score 30 or 2-17 how do you win like that

we have some ingredients to win big[playing lee and curry 40 minutes]
frye may be a guy who is better 6th man???

after that what is this team?
q-perpetually hurt
craw-perpetually streaky
marbury--showing age quick
jefferies--missing ingredient--for what rachel ray pie?
give collins more burn???

big fu --trading trevor ariza someone can poo poo this but look what this guy has done with consistent minutes? 55% shooting nearly 16-8-2-2-2 good D and only 21 younger than any knick? that is why--- when you draft someone YOUNG like that--you MUST give them 4 years



i like some heart shown but the *WHOLE THING* is screwed up--i was still wondering why we lose to philly i dont care if we are tired what 88-70???

problem is it is *married* to *HIS* guys and the good one's like lee he gets stiffed for jefferies who NO one else wanted???

it BIG problem he HAS to prove himself right no matter what even at the expense of not correcting mistake
he has fixated that jefferies is some kind of saviour player our boris diaw????

by the way what if we go 0-6 in the lucky games??? not 6-0 and sit at 7-26

is it really a good thing we won those games?

Posted by djsunyc:

next six games:

@sac, @por, @sea, phi, cha, sac

knicks should go 5-1 in the next 6 games. anything less should be considered dissapointing.

if lb was behind ariza leaving, then isiah could've brought him back but decided to go after jeffries.

Knicks should go 5-1 if they are really a decent team. I think the next 6 is definatly a good measuring stick.

LB could have still been behind Ariza leaving, but Isiah could have just valued Jefferies more than Ariza. So thats not really a good measure of if LB or Isiah wanted Ariza gone or not. I don't really see any reasoning for Isiah wanting Ariza gone though. Either way he is the one incharge of the pieces being moved so he should get the blame for adding Ariza in the deal anyway. But its a lose lose in your eyes anyway because he shouldn't have gave up Ariza, but yet if he didn't then you could say that he didn't allow Brown to get players he wanted.

What I also don't get is though some say that Isiah didn't draft M.Williams or go after PGs because he was scared of alienating Marbury. So why would Isiah push for a Steve Francis trade. Either he is scared to alienate Marbury or not.

I'll always take a W over an L as a fan- any other line of thought is bad for the team's present and future, unless you're tanking for a lotto pick, which we are clearly not, unless you're a Bulls fan, which you're clearly not.

Posted by simrud:

Hmm, maybe I should change my sig to 96 buick lol.

LeSabre sounds like a good handle...