Posted by holfresh:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by holfresh:
This is a team wide problem..like Q not paying attention to the passer in a key possession with the game on the line...David Lee not closing out or defending three point shooters...Nate somehow thinking that degree of difficulty points are awarded for each shot...Curry and Lee not punishing guards driving to the basket...Am I going to kill Marbs for looking like he is not ready for a pass that he is not getting...Hmmm...We have tons of issues with this team..Marbs ain't the biggest...
That's what I don't get. All do respect, Q flaired out looking for the pass like he was coming off a screen to take a quick 3, and when the ball wasn't thrown to him right away he started to run (he actually started to run back into the paint, he didn't just stand there and not look at Steph) whatever plan B was on that particular play.
I have no doubt the play was for a Q 3(Knicks were down by 3 at the time). I don't know what option B was but I'm sure it wasn't what happened.
I'll go far enough to admit it was a mutual misunderstanding(and I personally think that is a stretch because I remember ANOTHER poster-I forgot who-mentioned something about noticing Q constantly directing the offensive traffic when he is on the floor-while attending a game at the Garden).
I watched it again today and I think the ball was to be fed to the post and Marbs didn't have the angle...It would have been an easier pass for Q to make, if not he takes the three...He took his eye off the passer..But Marbs hesitated as well...He didn't hit Q as he flared out, lost eye contact with Q and didn't re-establish eye contact before passing the ball..But I think the play was to Curry...
[Edited by - holfresh on 12-13-2006 7:27 PM]
I haven't rewatched the play, but from what I remember, Q was on the sideline. Very rarely is the better passing angle to the post from the position Q was in-as opposed to the postion Marbury was at on the wing, not only because of the positioning, but the passer's defender is right there for a double team. That is not to mention the fact that the defender has alot less court to cover from the position Q was in.
Did Q, have the better lane to pass? I can't say positively but I would say in my opinion it is highly unlikely, just based on the reasons above.
AS I said before, I think Curry was option B, because to me it looked like Q was running back across the lane to clear his defender and ISO Curry and Marbs. I think just from the way the play was run, I though it looked like a Q 3.
[Edited by - joec32033 on 12-13-2006 7:35 PM]