[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Frye coming around?
Author Thread
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/21/2006  10:39 AM
The more I look at it the more the youth movement seem to be the way to go. Lee has been maybe the best Knick this season, Q has been damn good, and Robinson has been bringing it since day one.

But you guys know who I like: Channing Frye. Yesterday, he played the way I think he can play night after night. Maybe not score as many points, but hitting his J with consistency, getting down in the post and shooting over the guys he should, and getting the ball on the pick and roll/pick and pop and converting. He presents a matchup problem for other teams.

As long Frye can score, he will get the rebounds and blocks.

Screw Curry. As I have noticed, When Curry is out of it, Frye's game is up. When Curry is dominating the rest of the team is not really in the flow. Everythng is geared toward getting him off. When Frye is doing his thing, it is in the flow for the most part. I think it makes for a more interesting game.

One last thing: Did you all notice how many times these guys did not get the ball to Frye when he had his man pinned? They really need to drill some more on feeding the post!

oohah


Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
AUTOADVERT
Masterplan
Posts: 21571
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2002
Member: #362
11/21/2006  10:54 AM
here's my take on what i think would improve frye's offense:

- get him the damn ball in the post. he's been great there. especially after he makes a defensive play. reward him!

- jumpshot selection. to get him automatic from outside, he needs to take fewer long jumpshots. no 3's. probably no shots from just a step inside the line either. when he catches it there, he's actually hit a few nice shots off teh dribble. take a dribble in if you have space. or pass it off. also, he hasn't been great when he rushes his shot. take the time you need to release, or if you don't think you've got it, pass it off.

- don't shoot every time he touches the ball. love the kid, but in general i hate players int eh nba and guys i play with who shoot everything. channing got 18 shots last night, i hope as he's been shooting more effectively he gets more touches and doesn't feel the need to shoot every one.

my 2 c. if he was one of my fourth graders that's what i'd tell him.
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/21/2006  10:57 AM
Screw Curry. As I have noticed, When Curry is out of it, Frye's game is up. When Curry is dominating the rest of the team is not really in the flow. Everythng is geared toward getting him off. When Frye is doing his thing, it is in the flow for the most part. I think it makes for a more interesting game.
did you scratch out the part about how right I was about Frye and Curry not playing well together? Cmon man, I need to hear it.

Look... some time ago I suggested Frye trades for a few reasons
1) Curry and Frye are both centers and stink on the floor together
2) Isiah gave up so much to get Curry, so there was no way Curry was getting traded.
3) I showed evidence that Frye defended centers much better he defended PFs

That being said I am 100% with you that Frye is everything right and Curry is everything wrong.

Curry = fat, soft, lacks effort, quits when things dont go his way
Frye = in shape, works hard, doesnt give up, keeps fighting despite playing out of position and having some dreadfull games

So what do we do?

I have said 1000 times and stick to it that both are centers, and Frye will never find his NBA potential until he is able to stop chasing around NBA PFs (many of which are tweener types and not true PFs anyway) and play his natural position of center, where he can play on the high post and use his full arsenal of potent offesive weapons.

Put him next to Curry and he's a spot up jump shooter.

What a waste

This ties into my fervor for seeing Isiah gone. He's married to some of his (bad) decisons; Marbury and Curry. A small child can see that Frye and Lee deserve to start and recieve the bulk of the minutes on this team, but Isiah has far to much invested in Curry, so we will see Eddie out there again and again.
One last thing: Did you all notice how many times these guys did not get the ball to Frye when he had his man pinned? They really need to drill some more on feeding the post!
As DJ goes to all the games I think he can back me up on this. Franbury litteraly cant feed the post. Its mind boggling. Watching Frye post up in front of them is liking watching Arod with 2 strikes. You know he wants to swing at the curve, but he just cant pull the trigger. Franbury either WONT or CANT make simple (not easy, but a fundamental PG skill) entry passes to guys posting up when a defender is between them. Its nuts.

Dont mistaken this for more Isiah bashing. Its not my intent. In fact its clear Isiah has brought in some good players. Nate, Lee, Frye, Q, Balkman all the early makings for a good TEAM. The problem is ISiah is married to his mistakes at this point. So long as Isiah is here Franbury will be pounding the ball, and Curry will be loafing in the paint.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/21/2006  11:10 AM
^^^ Did we argue about them not being able to play together? If I took the other position I was wrong. (Savor that half-hearted admission!)

I thought the point I made was this: I think a part of the big problem with Curry and Frye on the court at the same time is the need to feature Curry. I want Curry to be a cleanup man. Feature Frye, make Curry rebound and dunk, that is what he can do.

If Curry has no other directive than to clean up, I see no reason why Frye and Curry can't coexist.

I also still don't agree with you that Frye is a natural Center. But so what His game won't change in either spot. At some point you just have to put your best players on the floor. So if Frye plays center, I have no problem with that. Frye will be more than competent played at center or PF if he does not have his mind in space and if the damn guards feed him.

The front line I want to see? James/Lee/Frye. Make the other squads match up with us!

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

11/21/2006  11:13 AM
Posted by oohah:

As I have noticed, When Curry is out of it, Frye's game is up. When Curry is dominating the rest of the team is not really in the flow. Everythng is geared toward getting him off. When Frye is doing his thing, it is in the flow for the most part. I think it makes for a more interesting game.

Exactly, This is one of my many problems with currys game ( i was gunna say my main problem but no.. thre are too many to list)

When we get curry going, everyone else suffers... Im so sick of him

Frye
Lee
Q
Jamal
Nate
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/21/2006  11:25 AM
Posted by oohah:

^^^ Did we argue about them not being able to play together? If I took the other position I was wrong. (Savor that half-hearted admission!)

I thought the point I made was this: I think a part of the big problem with Curry and Frye on the court at the same time is the need to feature Curry. I want Curry to be a cleanup man. Feature Frye, make Curry rebound and dunk, that is what he can do.

If Curry has no other directive than to clean up, I see no reason why Frye and Curry can't coexist.

I also still don't agree with you that Frye is a natural Center. But so what His game won't change in either spot. At some point you just have to put your best players on the floor. So if Frye plays center, I have no problem with that. Frye will be more than competent played at center or PF if he does not have his mind in space and if the damn guards feed him.

The front line I want to see? James/Lee/Frye. Make the other squads match up with us!

oohah
which is why I keep harping on that one point. IMO Frye at PF is no longer one of our "best players." But at center he certainly is. The fact that Frye is flourishing while Curry flounders is no coincedence. He's a bit of a finesse player on offense, but not on defense. He does much better when he can by physical. Everytime he's gotta chase around a shorter quicker guy he sucks. Let Lee do that. He's got a better motor than Frye, and both of their +/- #'s from last year and this clearly show that Lee defends PFs quite well and Frye defends centers quite well.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/21/2006  11:33 AM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by oohah:

^^^ Did we argue about them not being able to play together? If I took the other position I was wrong. (Savor that half-hearted admission!)

I thought the point I made was this: I think a part of the big problem with Curry and Frye on the court at the same time is the need to feature Curry. I want Curry to be a cleanup man. Feature Frye, make Curry rebound and dunk, that is what he can do.

If Curry has no other directive than to clean up, I see no reason why Frye and Curry can't coexist.

I also still don't agree with you that Frye is a natural Center. But so what His game won't change in either spot. At some point you just have to put your best players on the floor. So if Frye plays center, I have no problem with that. Frye will be more than competent played at center or PF if he does not have his mind in space and if the damn guards feed him.

The front line I want to see? James/Lee/Frye. Make the other squads match up with us!

oohah
which is why I keep harping on that one point. IMO Frye at PF is no longer one of our "best players." But at center he certainly is. The fact that Frye is flourishing while Curry flounders is no coincedence. He's a bit of a finesse player on offense, but not on defense. He does much better when he can by physical. Everytime he's gotta chase around a shorter quicker guy he sucks. Let Lee do that. He's got a better motor than Frye, and both of their +/- #'s from last year and this clearly show that Lee defends PFs quite well and Frye defends centers quite well.


OT: Lee defends the center better than Curry too. Did you see that last night? Well I guess so do you and I, and Webster.

oohah


Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/21/2006  12:23 PM
forget about 10 minutes of hustle against Yao.

Lee:
http://www.82games.com/0607/06NYK9C.HTM
Frye:
http://www.82games.com/0506/05NYK18C.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0607/06NYK11C.HTM

you can single out a time here or there but this is hard data that leaves little for discussion.

Frye gets destroyed at PF.

Curry sucks. I cant remember a player ever looking so suck ass
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/21/2006  12:26 PM
Posted by fishmike:

Curry sucks. I cant remember a player ever looking so suck ass

Marbury's giving Curry a good run for his money this season.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

11/21/2006  12:29 PM
More of the offense should be ran through him I said this at the beginning of the season. I just wish he would operate closer to the basket and actually develop a post game.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/21/2006  12:33 PM
If Frye is who we're going to focus our offense around, we're in major trouble. Frye is a complementary player, that's it. He doesn't have the game or the mentality to be the Man.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/21/2006  12:36 PM
Posted by SeatsBlue:

More of the offense should be ran through him I said this at the beginning of the season. I just wish he would operate closer to the basket and actually develop a post game.
he tries, our guards cant make entry passes. Frye is constantly trying to post up. You miss it on TV quite a lot, but this is a case of the guards not getting him the ball. Its not a case of him being content with long jumpers.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

11/21/2006  12:37 PM
Posted by islesfan:

If Frye is who we're going to focus our offense around, we're in major trouble. Frye is a complementary player, that's it. He doesn't have the game or the mentality to be the Man.

I said more of the offense should be ran through him, not that he is some force go to type of guy. Besides this team doesn't have one player who you could confidently say it's in the best interest of the team to make him the focal point. The reason I like frye is becuase most of what he does is high % for his skill set. He does occassionally make a bad offensive play here and there mainly due to being too far away from the basket. I'd like to see a heavy dose of Q and Frye.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/21/2006  12:39 PM
Posted by fishmike:

forget about 10 minutes of hustle against Yao.

Lee:
http://www.82games.com/0607/06NYK9C.HTM
Frye:
http://www.82games.com/0506/05NYK18C.HTM
http://www.82games.com/0607/06NYK11C.HTM

you can single out a time here or there but this is hard data that leaves little for discussion.

Frye gets destroyed at PF.

Curry sucks. I cant remember a player ever looking so suck ass

The thing about the 82 games stats is that it doesn't take into account how many good PF's there are and how the center position generally blows. I think any of the guys we could run at PF will generally look less efficient after they run the gauntlet of NBA PF's don't you?

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/21/2006  12:51 PM
you dont have to look at that. Focus then on Lee vs. Frye's #s against opposing PFs.

PFs vs. Lee are shooting 0.472 EFG%
PFs vs. Frye are shooting 0.667 EFG%
PFs vs. Jefferies are shooting 0.485 EFG%
Now you tell me.. which player do you want guarding opposing PFs?

How do you look at this and say you still want Frye guarding PFs? He's terrible at it. Meanwhile JJ/Lee between this year and last are guarding PFs as well as anyone in the league.

If you were a coach I would say bad job because your not putting players who have proven to excell in paticular areas in a position to suceed.

Forget about this data and go by what I see... Frye gets abused at PF on a night in and night out basis, while Isiah keeps running him out there. Bad job
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
11/21/2006  12:51 PM
Yeah, there are certainly a lot of good PF's out there who are better than Frye.

[Edited by - islesfan on 11-21-2006 12:54 PM]
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/21/2006  1:03 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Screw Curry. As I have noticed, When Curry is out of it, Frye's game is up. When Curry is dominating the rest of the team is not really in the flow. Everythng is geared toward getting him off. When Frye is doing his thing, it is in the flow for the most part. I think it makes for a more interesting game.
did you scratch out the part about how right I was about Frye and Curry not playing well together? Cmon man, I need to hear it.

Look... some time ago I suggested Frye trades for a few reasons
1) Curry and Frye are both centers and stink on the floor together
2) Isiah gave up so much to get Curry, so there was no way Curry was getting traded.
3) I showed evidence that Frye defended centers much better he defended PFs

That being said I am 100% with you that Frye is everything right and Curry is everything wrong.

Curry = fat, soft, lacks effort, quits when things dont go his way
Frye = in shape, works hard, doesnt give up, keeps fighting despite playing out of position and having some dreadfull games

So what do we do?

I have said 1000 times and stick to it that both are centers, and Frye will never find his NBA potential until he is able to stop chasing around NBA PFs (many of which are tweener types and not true PFs anyway) and play his natural position of center, where he can play on the high post and use his full arsenal of potent offesive weapons.

Put him next to Curry and he's a spot up jump shooter.

What a waste

This ties into my fervor for seeing Isiah gone. He's married to some of his (bad) decisons; Marbury and Curry. A small child can see that Frye and Lee deserve to start and recieve the bulk of the minutes on this team, but Isiah has far to much invested in Curry, so we will see Eddie out there again and again.
One last thing: Did you all notice how many times these guys did not get the ball to Frye when he had his man pinned? They really need to drill some more on feeding the post!
As DJ goes to all the games I think he can back me up on this. Franbury litteraly cant feed the post. Its mind boggling. Watching Frye post up in front of them is liking watching Arod with 2 strikes. You know he wants to swing at the curve, but he just cant pull the trigger. Franbury either WONT or CANT make simple (not easy, but a fundamental PG skill) entry passes to guys posting up when a defender is between them. Its nuts.

Dont mistaken this for more Isiah bashing. Its not my intent. In fact its clear Isiah has brought in some good players. Nate, Lee, Frye, Q, Balkman all the early makings for a good TEAM. The problem is ISiah is married to his mistakes at this point. So long as Isiah is here Franbury will be pounding the ball, and Curry will be loafing in the paint.

Excellent post fish. last night my 14 year old son was watching the game with me, and frye made this nice bank shot off the glass off a pick and roll, even kenny smith was commenting how hard of a shot that was, and my son said "Dad, why don't the knicks play frye at center and lee at PF?" I said" "Son, it is because frye may be a little light to play centers, for example, look at the hard time he would have guarding yao tonight".. My son then responded " dad, look at the job yao is doing on curry". I said good point son... GAme, set, match on that one.. LOL..

I think a line up of, frye, lee, jared jeffries, steph and Q would be a good starting 5. then you bring in craw, nate, balkman and james off the bench, and you have a nice rotation.. I say, try and move curry and francis for expirings and draft picks....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
efw
Posts: 20669
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2005
Member: #1002

11/21/2006  1:05 PM
Posted by islesfan:

If Frye is who we're going to focus our offense around, we're in major trouble. Frye is a complementary player, that's it. He doesn't have the game or the mentality to be the Man.

I disagree with this. What do you see that says he is weak mentally? Everything I've seen shows me that he has the determination to push through bad spells or troubling times. He demands the ball when he thinks he's in a position to score and he's not hesitant to put up a shot. I'd be surprised if he ever said something stupid to the press ala Marbury or complained about PT if he wasn't deserving it.

Defensively, no he isn't the best, but he's shown promise as a weak side shot blocker and help defender. He's not going to be Tim Duncan or Ewing, but I could see him being a main cog on a good team.

He needs to play the post though. Staying on the perimeter is not good for him. They should start Cato or James at center and let Curry try to abuse second unit players
mattshaw78
Posts: 20908
Alba Posts: 52
Joined: 6/23/2005
Member: #915
11/21/2006  1:07 PM
Excellent post fish. last night my 14 year old son was watching the game with me, and frye made this nice bank shot off the glass off a pick and roll, even kenny smith was commenting how hard of a shot that was, and my son said "Dad, why don't the knicks play frye at center and lee at PF?" I said" "Son, it is because frye may be a little light to play centers, for example, look at the hard time he would have guarding yao tonight".. My son then responded " dad, look at the job yao is doing on curry". I said good point son... GAme, set, match on that one.. LOL..

I think a line up of, frye, lee, jared jeffries, steph and Q would be a good starting 5. then you bring in craw, nate, balkman and james off the bench, and you have a nice rotation.. I say, try and move curry and francis for expirings and draft picks....

Can we have your 14 year old son run the team instead of Zeke
BlueSeats "I like anyone who can make Lebron cry. Melo seems to do it a lot."
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/21/2006  1:15 PM
Excellent post fish. last night my 14 year old son was watching the game with me, and frye made this nice bank shot off the glass off a pick and roll, even kenny smith was commenting how hard of a shot that was, and my son said "Dad, why don't the knicks play frye at center and lee at PF?" I said" "Son, it is because frye may be a little light to play centers, for example, look at the hard time he would have guarding yao tonight".. My son then responded " dad, look at the job yao is doing on curry". I said good point son... GAme, set, match on that one.. LOL..

I think a line up of, frye, lee, jared jeffries, steph and Q would be a good starting 5. then you bring in craw, nate, balkman and james off the bench, and you have a nice rotation.. I say, try and move curry and francis for expirings and draft picks....

Your son is smart cookie!

Like I wrote above, Emmanuel Lewis guards the center spot better than Curry, so I would definitely play Frye over him there or at any other position. Overall, I would prefer to see a "true" center playing next to Frye such as James. Curry really does not have a position on offense as he has never developed a game!

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Frye coming around?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy