Jamal, Q, Lee at the three, Frye and Curry. I think this gives the team a much better chance of winning, more energy, and more balance. Lee will have trouble guarding a three sometimes but in the end I could see it work

that's what it should look like till jeffries comes back.

it's not like their defense is good now anyways so it won't matter. plus, they can play more zone.

my only worry would be Jamals ability to distribute

I think that starting Lee at the four and either Frye or Curry at the 5 might be the best option. Frye needs the pick and roll and post up opportunities to maximize his game. He doesn't get those with Curry playing alongside him. Curry benefits from Lee's passing and his strong defense. I think Lee would be a great compliment to either of these guys. I also think both Q and Jeffries should start when Jeffries comes back. Jeffries could play the two to allow Q to keep having the success he has had so far.

Marbury
Nate
Q
Lee or Frye
Curry


WHy does Jamal get the benefit of performance for about a month last year but everyone discount's Frye's performance for the better part of the season? For now it looks like Jamal is the same chucker that he is for 4/5th of every season.

Posted by djsunyc:

i think jamal will try. he will listen to the coach as exhibited last year. i'm not saying he will be good at it but at least he will try.

[Edited by - nykshaknbake on 11-14-2006 7:11 PM]

Posted by King1:

Jamal, Q, Lee at the three, Frye and Curry. I think this gives the team a much better chance of winning, more energy, and more balance. Lee will have trouble guarding a three sometimes but in the end I could see it work

The only ything that changes are the knicks stay in the games early only to insert the lame and lethargic FRANBURY DUO to relinquish the leads.