if i dont see nate, craw, Q, balkman, and Lee in the next game as the starting lineup, i might have to kill someone. Is isiah retarted? when we lose we have marbs, francis, curry, and rose in. But the 2nd string kicks *** for the rest of hte game. I dont know what the hell isiah is thinking, does he want to lose, or is he just completely retarted. The thing that KILLS me is when the young kids bring us back into the game (within 5) and then Isiah goes to the old bum's on the bench. Somebody should just show him a chart of how the knicks do with the current starters in the game (probably around -20 pts) and how the 2nd stringers do when they are in (probably +25 pts). I cant imagine a man with this large of a job can't realize such a simple fact. I am really just ticked off and may be over reacting but if i was Isiah i would pray to god that i start the RIGHT players, or he will defintley be fired by fat *** dolan. I GUARENTEE a win if the knicks do what i say, and start the young guys. One more thing, what is with the NO TOLERANCE crap. Isiah said he will bench anyone who dosent perform (thats what the whole starting lineup has done the whole season minus Q), i have not seen one of these bums benched come crunch time. This just shows me that Isiah has balls the size of peas, and he wont stand up to his "guys" (steph, steve, curry). I honestly think i could do a better job than Isiah as a 15 year old kid. Its so simple, JUST PLAY THE YOUNG KDIS

Also, just looking at the box score, nate had more points than Steph and Francis COMBINED (Steph + Francis= 5, Nate=19)
Frye played well (17+9)
NATE---- 9/10 19 pts 3 reb 3 ast in 23 mins (BT also just called him "unstoppable", and i completely agree with his point because he is too quick and hangs in the air way too long for the defender to make a play as BT just said)

Don't blame Malik he has helped us make a couple comebacks this year

I agree. I think most of us do but at the same time Malik when he plays he hustles and that is a good example for the young guys. A better example than what Curry and Marbs are setting currently. You just said when we lose it's when we have marbs, francis, curry, and rose in. I just think Malik has been a part of at least 3 comebacks and I don't think he's played more than 4 games.

Posted by nykbasketball:

i agreed with the malik on duncan move, but i would much rather see lee in crunch time minutes instead of malik, because malik is not our future

Malik also for all his positives has TUNS AND TUNS of negatives... Turnovers, offensive fouls, missed layups.. the list goes on and on... DLEE is a better player - period.