[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks....as currently constructed
Author Thread
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
7/17/2006  11:30 AM
I believe that the Knicks will be a better team this season basically because the chaos has been removed, now they can concentrate on playing and not looking over their shoulders. There will be a set lineup and others will know their roles. I predict a 35 to 39 win season or better:
Curry - Scoring will be ok, rebounds and blocks are my concern
J. James - will be ok but plays better when he's included in offense
Marbs - will go back to 20 and 8. Not a great defender, never has been
Francis - If he wants to stay, Zeke will get him to play
Frye - will improve, basically a Camby type more of a scorer than rebounder
Lee - Mr. Hustle will play well, not worried about him at all
Butler - Solid off bench but don't know if he'll be around
Crawford - became smarter last year, good upside
Nate - good energy but need to become smarter
Q-Rich - bad season last year but might flourish in new offense (might be traded)
J-Rose - may be traded, still has game and value
M-Rose - he'll play because we need his ruggedness
Mo T - may be traded, won't see much floor time
Udoka - I don't know why he's here???
Balkman - will get some time for hustle and defense
Collins - won't play too much
Q-Woods - odd man out and I don't like it!!
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
AUTOADVERT
subzero0
Posts: 21244
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/24/2003
Member: #410
7/17/2006  11:52 AM
I dont know dude. This is the same crew as last year and I was hyped before last season began also. We lose a hall of fame coach and now your excited?? I just dont know man.

nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2006  12:01 PM
Posted by subzero0:

I dont know dude. This is the same crew as last year and I was hyped before last season began also. We lose a hall of fame coach and now your excited?? I just dont know man.

To some people, losing a hall of fame coach with a plan to turn the franchise around is addition by subtraction. I don't know HOW but to them, it is.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30260
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
7/17/2006  12:28 PM
You guys act like the hall of fame coach. Coached like a hall of fame coach last yr but yet the roster was so bad that even his hall of fame coaching skills wasn't enough to get us to win.

Larry Brown put in a horrible coaching performance last season. For the record he wasn't soley the reason for the teams failure. But again he put in a horrible coaching performance last yr.

I think with the talent on the team and Isiahs system. They should be one of the top scoring teams in the league next yr. The defense is still going to lack. But we will be a little better than last season. I think this team will do well during the regular season as a strong offensive team. Larry Brown would have never settled for a good regular season by relying on strong offense. But as of right now thats what the team is going to have to do until we can cut the contracts of Franchise & Marbury.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
JUNKMEIN
Posts: 20401
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/14/2004
Member: #797
7/17/2006  12:29 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by subzero0:

I dont know dude. This is the same crew as last year and I was hyped before last season began also. We lose a hall of fame coach and now your excited?? I just dont know man.

To some people, losing a hall of fame coach with a plan to turn the franchise around is addition by subtraction. I don't know HOW but to them, it is.

Yeah yeah, but to some others, losing a hall of fame coach with a "peculiar propensity to partake in pettiness with his players" (say it real fast over and over) is addition by subtraction. That's how it is to them.

I was an advocate of LB being here. However, the basic tenement of leadership is an ability to inspire trust and loyalty. I respect the hell outta LB but this wasn't the time, place or circumstance for him. I'm sure he'll do well at his next stop but it's water under the bridge now.

Now how do we compell Isiah to get QWoods back in the picture?


[Edited by - Junkmein on 07-17-2006 12:31 PM]
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/17/2006  12:50 PM
What offense did the knicks run last year? 40 plus line ups? Guys getting dnp's coaches decision even after playing well? Benching of players for no reason and trashing them in the media?

I mean where the hell were you guys last year? I'm suck of reading it. larry sucked last year. The only argument you guys have to support him is that he is a hall of fame coach. What about what he did last year.

I had respect for Larry before last season. The truth is he did not coach to win this season. What his motives were we will never know buy the evidence shows from day one that something was up.

Isiah is not red holtzman, yet st least. The knicks have an offense and there seems to be a language on defense. The defense is sparking the offense if you saw summer league. The mentality if very different so far and that is a reflection of the head coach. Yes it is.

Enjoy what you see and let's have fun talking about the game and not all the other crap you guys like to talk about.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2006  12:58 PM
Posted by EnySpree:

What offense did the knicks run last year? 40 plus line ups? Guys getting dnp's coaches decision even after playing well? Benching of players for no reason and trashing them in the media?

I mean where the hell were you guys last year? I'm suck of reading it. larry sucked last year. The only argument you guys have to support him is that he is a hall of fame coach. What about what he did last year.

I had respect for Larry before last season. The truth is he did not coach to win this season. What his motives were we will never know buy the evidence shows from day one that something was up.

Isiah is not red holtzman, yet st least. The knicks have an offense and there seems to be a language on defense. The defense is sparking the offense if you saw summer league. The mentality if very different so far and that is a reflection of the head coach. Yes it is.

Enjoy what you see and let's have fun talking about the game and not all the other crap you guys like to talk about.

You made one fact in that whole post and that fact is kind of slanted. How many injuries did the Knicks starting lineup have last year? Injuries to Marbury, Curry, Frye, Q. The suspension of Tony Davis. The additions of Jalen Rose and Steve Francis, all of these are major factors in how many starting lineups that your team uses.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
purple012870
Posts: 21778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2003
Member: #432
7/17/2006  1:15 PM
EnySPREE > nice post, I agree 100%
Travla
Posts: 23532
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/27/2004
Member: #723
USA
7/17/2006  1:20 PM
There were many lineup changes that had nothing to do with injuries. For those of you who cannot see that LB did a poor coaching job, that's fine. I like LB as a coach but I knew he wasn't the coach for this team as it was constructed. The Knicks will look and perform better this year, I believe that and it's not a comparison of coaches but of coaching styles. There may be a trade or two but basically this is our team. No, this team will not be a defensive juggernaut but they will do almost everything better than last season. This same group of guys will show that last year was not entirely their faults.
https://www.youtube.com/user/RPreston01/videos
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/17/2006  2:15 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by EnySpree:

What offense did the knicks run last year? 40 plus line ups? Guys getting dnp's coaches decision even after playing well? Benching of players for no reason and trashing them in the media?

I mean where the hell were you guys last year? I'm suck of reading it. larry sucked last year. The only argument you guys have to support him is that he is a hall of fame coach. What about what he did last year.

I had respect for Larry before last season. The truth is he did not coach to win this season. What his motives were we will never know buy the evidence shows from day one that something was up.

Isiah is not red holtzman, yet st least. The knicks have an offense and there seems to be a language on defense. The defense is sparking the offense if you saw summer league. The mentality if very different so far and that is a reflection of the head coach. Yes it is.

Enjoy what you see and let's have fun talking about the game and not all the other crap you guys like to talk about.

You made one fact in that whole post and that fact is kind of slanted. How many injuries did the Knicks starting lineup have last year? Injuries to Marbury, Curry, Frye, Q. The suspension of Tony Davis. The additions of Jalen Rose and Steve Francis, all of these are major factors in how many starting lineups that your team uses.

Please. The Knicks had 12 players start 10 games or more. 12 players. Throw in Jerome James starting 9 games and you have 13 guys who were yanked around. We didn't have a single player start 70 games, despite having 5 guys play in 70+ games.

DLee only played in 67 games, despite not being injured all season - that means 15 healthy scratches. Nate Robinson only played in 72 games, despite not being injured all season - that means 10 healthy scrathes. That's 25 healthy scratches for guys who left their heart and soul out on the court every night.

Channing Frye averaged 26mpg in November when he was Rookie of the Month (despite being a healthy scratch in the first game for no reason other than Brown's arrogance) - in March, before his injury Frye was averaging only 17.5mpg for the month. His minutes went down. Larry Brown sucks. I hate that terrible, plotting, coniving shi!t. He can rot in East Hampton.
¿ △ ?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/17/2006  2:18 PM
crzymdups, these are the facts that I've been dying to see ever since someone kept harping that the minutes were a plenty.

Someone please try to speak against this support.

props mdups.
all kool aid all the time.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/17/2006  2:18 PM
As for the construction of the Knicks - I like the talent level in general, and I like the way most of the roster compliments each other. But I think Isiah needs to make some hard decisions. Jerome James, Jalen Rose, Mo Taylor and Steve Francis all need to go.

Sign Qyntel and Jackie B. Sign Miller. Try to get something in a trade for Francis. If he wants to keep Mo and Jalen's contracts around for a trade if Dolan opens the war chest - fine. But Jerome James needs to go now.
¿ △ ?
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/17/2006  2:23 PM
I'm am still of the opinion that last year was one of those crazy year's that nobody can explain.

I'm holding out hope for Francis and Jerome James living up to their billing (for jj that's like 5/5/2 and 6 fouls), i think the real questionable player and everyone seems to forget about is...

Malik Rose.

Does he even have any shot of playing for this team?
all kool aid all the time.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
7/17/2006  2:24 PM
Posted by rvhoss:

I'm am still of the opinion that last year was one of those crazy year's that nobody can explain.

I'm holding out hope for Francis and Jerome James living up to their billing (for jj that's like 5/5/2 and 6 fouls), i think the real questionable player and everyone seems to forget about is...

Malik Rose.

Does he even have any shot of playing for this team?

I don't want Malik to play, but I like him as a veteran leader in the lockerroom. I think Balkman and Lee will inspire Malik. If we need to give him a few minutes a night, fine. I think Malik is a quality guy who should stick around. I think the same thing about QRich, but I'd like to find Q some minutes at SG/SF.
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2006  2:53 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

Please. The Knicks had 12 players start 10 games or more. 12 players. Throw in Jerome James starting 9 games and you have 13 guys who were yanked around. We didn't have a single player start 70 games, despite having 5 guys play in 70+ games.
Stephon Marbury missed 22 games which means someone had to take his spot in the starting lineup for that many games.
Eddy curry missed 10 games. Which mean again, a different player or players have to start in his place.
Quentin Richardson missed 27 games which means that players have to fill in his starts for 27 games.

Right there you have 59 games missed by starting players that have to be made up by different players.
Why is that such a big deal.
DLee only played in 67 games, despite not being injured all season - that means 15 healthy scratches. Nate Robinson only played in 72 games, despite not being injured all season - that means 10 healthy scrathes. That's 25 healthy scratches for guys who left their heart and soul out on the court every night.
Lets take a look at the previous players picked #30 in the draft and how many games they played and how many minutes a game they played their rookie year.
2005 - David Lee - 67G 14GS 16.9mpg
2004 - David Harrison - 43G 14GS 17.7mpg
2003 - Lampe - 21G 0GS 10.7mpg
2002 - Steve Logan - never played in the NBA
2001 - Trenton Hassell - 78g 47GS 28.7mpg
2000 - Marco Jaric - played in Europe till 2003
1999 - John Celestland - 16G 0GS 11.6mpg

Most coaches played players picked where Lee was picked teh same amount as Brown did. Most coaches make players earn their spot in the rotation and it usually takes a year for that to happen. The only player that you can argue is Trenton Hassel who Tim Floyd played a ton.
Channing Frye averaged 26mpg in November when he was Rookie of the Month (despite being a healthy scratch in the first game for no reason other than Brown's arrogance) - in March, before his injury Frye was averaging only 17.5mpg for the month. His minutes went down. Larry Brown sucks. I hate that terrible, plotting, coniving shi!t. He can rot in East Hampton.

While Fryes minutes went down in March before he was injured, Lee's went up. Is there a explanation for this? I don't know, maybe Brown was having a hard time finding minutes for 2 players who play the same position. Frye didn't play AS minutes as I would hope, but his MPG were up there with the rest of the rookies picked where Frye was so I can't really complain about it too much.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07-17-2006 2:53 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

7/17/2006  2:55 PM
Now the conversation is changing for the better.

I like this thread because its a good way to fish out who is a fan of basketball and who is just a tabloid hog.

truth is that last year screwed up any chance to really see what type of team you have. Isiah has a quick trigger when it comes to making moves. He is hesitant because he has no clue what he has. That's why summer league was awesome. Its easy to say yeah its just summer league but what happens when you sub in Francis, marbs, and craw into the backcourt instead of the nobodies the knicks had out there? What happens when frye is out there taking the shots miller was getting? What happens when curry has the rock working the paint instead of akelede? Balkman is nice buy what can jalen or q-rich do in that role?

This is what is exciting about this season. The show of dispair in the voices of so called knick fans is just juvenille.

I can see orange and blue again.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
7/17/2006  2:58 PM
Rookies Ranked by minutes per game.

PLAYER NAME, TEAM NAME GP MPG PTS FGM-FGA FG% 3PM-3PA 3P% FTM-FTA FT%
1
Chris Paul , NOK
78 36.0 16.1 5.2-12.1 .430 .6-2.3 .282 5.1-6.0 .847
2
Charlie Villanueva , TOR
81 29.1 13.0 5.4-11.6 .463 .9-2.6 .327 1.4-2.0 .706
3
CHANNING FRYE, NYK
65 24.4 12.3 4.7-9.8 .477 .0-.1 .333 2.9-3.5 .825---
4
Raymond Felton , CHA
80 30.1 11.8 4.3-11.0 .391 1.2-3.4 .358 2.0-2.8 .725
5
Deron Williams , UTA
80 28.9 10.8 4.2-10.1 .421 1.1-2.7 .416 1.2-1.7 .704
6
Salim Stoudamire , ATL
61 20.4 9.6 3.3-8.0 .413 1.3-3.5 .380 1.6-1.8 .900
7
Andrew Bogut , MIL
82 28.7 9.4 3.9-7.4 .533 .0-.0 .000 1.5-2.4 .629
8
NATE ROBINSON , NYK
72 21.4 9.3 3.2-7.8 .407 .8-2.0 .397 2.1-2.8 .752---
9
Bracey Wright , MIN
7 19.3 8.9 3.0-7.3 .412 .9-2.4 .353 2.0-2.3 .875
10
Luther Head , HOU
80 29.0 8.8 3.2-7.9 .403 1.4-3.9 .361 1.1-1.5 .699
11
Marvin Williams , ATL
79 24.8 8.5 3.0-6.7 .443 .2-.7 .245 2.4-3.2 .747
12
Sean May , CHA
23 17.3 8.2 3.0-7.4 .409 .0-.2 .000 2.1-2.8 .766
13
Rashad McCants , MIN
79 17.3 7.9 3.1-6.8 .450 .8-2.3 .372 1.0-1.3 .736
14
Ryan Gomes , BOS
61 22.7 7.6 2.8-5.8 .487 .0-.1 .333 1.8-2.4 .752
15
Danny Granger , IND
78 22.9 7.5 2.8-6.1 .462 .4-1.2 .323 1.5-1.9 .777
16
Sarunas Jasikevicius , IND
75 21.0 7.3 2.3-5.7 .396 1.1-3.1 .364 1.6-1.8 .910
17
Ike Diogu , GSW
69 15.4 7.0 2.5-4.8 .524 .0-.0 .000 2.0-2.4 .810
18
Monta Ellis , GSW
49 18.7 6.8 2.7-6.5 .415 .6-1.7 .341 .9-1.2 .712
19
Amir Johnson , DET
3 12.9 6.7 2.3-3.3 .700 .7-1.0 .667 1.3-1.3 1.000
20
Joey Graham , TOR
80 19.8 6.7 2.5-5.2 .478 .4-1.1 .333 1.4-1.7 .812
21
Jarrett Jack , POR
79 20.4 6.7 2.4-5.4 .442 .3-1.0 .263 1.6-2.0 .800
22
Martell Webster , POR
61 17.6 6.6 2.3-5.7 .399 1.1-3.0 .357 1.0-1.2 .859
23
Alan Anderson , CHA
36 15.7 5.8 2.1-5.0 .414 .7-1.6 .414 .9-1.1 .805
24
Francisco Garcia , SAC
67 19.7 5.6 1.9-4.9 .400 .6-2.0 .285 1.2-1.5 .772
25
Jose Calderon , TOR
64 23.2 5.5 2.1-4.9 .423 .1-.7 .163 1.2-1.4 .848
26
Gerald Green , BOS
32 11.7 5.2 2.1-4.3 .478 .2-.6 .300 .9-1.2 .784
27
Johan Petro , SEA
68 18.9 5.2 2.2-4.4 .510 .0-.0 .000 .7-1.1 .627
28
DAVID LEE , NYK
67 16.8 5.1 2.0-3.4 .598 .0-.0 .000 1.1-1.8 .577----
29
Anthony Grundy , ATL
12 9.0 4.3 1.6-3.2 .500 .4-1.2 .333 .8-1.2 .643
30
Hakim Warrick , MEM
68 10.8 4.1 1.5-3.4 .443 .0-.0 .000 1.1-1.7 .661
31
Travis Diener , ORL
23 10.7 3.8 1.3-3.0 .420 1.1-2.5 .439 .2-.3 .833
32
Daniel Ewing , LAC
66 14.8 3.8 1.5-3.9 .380 .3-1.2 .282 .5-.7 .783
33
Charles Hayes , HOU
40 13.6 3.7 1.5-2.6 .562 .0-.0 .000 .7-1.1 .644
34
Will Bynum , GSW
15 11.0 3.6 1.4-3.5 .404 .1-.6 .222 .7-1.1 .625
35
Linas Kleiza , DEN
61 8.5 3.5 1.3-2.8 .445 .0-.2 .154 .9-1.3 .704
36
James Singleton , LAC
59 12.9 3.4 1.3-2.6 .510 .2-.3 .500 .7-.8 .780
37
CJ Miles , UTA
23 8.8 3.4 1.2-3.3 .368 .2-.9 .250 .8-1.0 .750
38
Wayne Simien , MIA
43 9.6 3.4 1.3-2.8 .483 .0-.0 .000 .7-.8 .882
39
Orien Greene , BOS
80 15.7 3.2 1.2-3.2 .395 .1-.5 .225 .6-.8 .662
40
Rawle Marshall , DAL
23 10.5 3.1 1.0-2.6 .400 .0-.1 .333 1.0-1.3 .759
41
Josh Powell , DAL
37 11.9 3.0 1.0-2.2 .457 .0-.0 .000 1.0-1.2 .800
42
Sergei Monia , SAC-POR
26 13.2 3.0 1.1-3.3 .333 .3-1.3 .265 .4-.5 .714
43
Dijon Thompson , PHX
10 4.3 2.8 1.1-2.5 .440 .4-1.1 .364 .2-.2 1.000
44
Chris Taft , GSW
17 8.5 2.8 1.4-2.2 .605 .0-.0 .000 .1-.4 .167
45
Donell Taylor , WAS
51 9.3 2.7 1.0-2.7 .390 .1-.3 .235 .6-.8 .698
46
Melvin Sanders , SAS
16 7.1 2.6 1.0-2.1 .485 .1-.2 .667 .4-.6 .700
47
Brandon Bass , NOK
29 9.3 2.3 1.0-2.4 .400 .0-.0 .000 .4-.7 .632
48
Arvydas Macijauskas , NOK
19 7.1 2.3 .7-2.2 .341 .2-.6 .250 .7-.8 .867
49
John Lucas , HOU
13 8.2 2.3 1.1-2.8 .389 .2-.7 .222 .0-.0 .000
49
Jason Maxiell , DET
26 6.1 2.3 .9-2.1 .426 .0-.0 .000 .5-1.6 .333

http://www.nba.com/statistics/player/Scoring.jsp?league=00&season=22005&conf=OVERALL&position=0&splitType=9&splitScope=GAME&qualified=N&yearsExp=0&splitDD=

[Edited by - joec32033 on 07-17-2006 2:59 PM]
~You can't run from who you are.~
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/17/2006  2:58 PM
Posted by EnySpree:


I like this thread because its a good way to fish out who is a fan of basketball and who is just a tabloid hog.

I'm so sick of seeing people type crap like this. We're all fans here, just becuase we all don't agree doesn't mean we're here for tabloids. I don't understand who can get off with saying that. I guess that whole charade you pulled a few weeks ago when you decided to "leave" the forum was becuase your a fan of basketball and you weren't trying to get attention?


[Edited by - nyk4ever on 07-17-2006 3:00 PM]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
metra
Posts: 20743
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/11/2003
Member: #473
7/17/2006  3:02 PM
What happens when you take out all scrubs playing for the other teams and replace them with the actual players...
subzero0
Posts: 21244
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/24/2003
Member: #410
7/17/2006  3:03 PM
My point is this: This is the same team we had last year, except we lost a good coach (whether or not you believe he was in the right place or right time) and we added two rooks possibly at the expense of a couple of good players. See Qyntel and Butler. I understand this team will be better, really there is nowhere else to go but up. A change of coaching "scenery" is good. However, the kind of optimism I am seeing here about just how good the Knicks will be and how we are going to outplay teams now because we are quicker, stronger, better is the same kind of optimism that was here last summer before that horrible season started. Curb your enthusiasm! This team has not been vastly overhauled. The same flaws that were here last year, guess what, they're still here. Unless we make a move that will give us a different player in our starting line up, be prepared to be disappointed.
Knicks....as currently constructed

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy