By the way Isiah sounded today, it looks like Jackie is not going to be resigned. Do you think Isiah should have signed Nazr? I feel Nazr could have been a good solid backup center/pf for Curry and Frye at times. Especially for the games that Curry gets in foul trouble.

[Edited by - BigC on 07-13-2006 9:44 PM]

Nazr is a role player. The Knicks to find firm building blocks before they go out and get guys like Nazr or else guys like Nazr are wasted.

he's a good rebounder but thats about it. He's the black hole and mediocre defensively. No need for him when we have Jackie who many teams want. he's much better than Big Snacks though

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07-13-2006 10:32 PM]

Posted by gunsnewing:

he's a good rebounder but thats about it. He's the black hole and mediocre defensively. No need for him when we have Jackie who many teams want. he's much better than Big Snacks though

[Edited by - gunsnewing on 07-13-2006 10:32 PM]

When Nazr was on the team he was the complete opposite of a black hole. As a matter of fact, the majority of Nazr points were made from putback and tip ins. Nazr use to pass the ball back out if he was double team or to the open man. Which is the opposite of James and Mo. Nazr can also get offensive boards that this team is lacking.

As far as Nazr defense being mediocre what do you consider Jackie's defense to be?