Originally posted by metra:
Originally posted by Solace:
No better way to phrase it. When we had Trevor Ariza, he was a defensive stud who anchored our defense and had all-star potential. Now we draft a guy who 90% of the board has never seen play, many never heard of before, and definitely wasn't a first rounder (one GMs ego aside), yet some are claiming he's already better than Ariza.
It must be the kool-aid.
It's kool-aid all right. Except in reverse.
Ariza is all kool-aid. That kid has no skill. All he can do is jump. Ariza wasn't exactly an energy JYD. All his energy came when he get all excited over a put back. I've said it before and I'll say it again, Ariza will get no where in the NBA.
All-star potential!?! Gimme a break. Let's just get go ahead and draft high jumpers into the NBA.. we'll get the same result. I dunno where you got "anchored our defense" either. Maybe he was slightly better than others, but on the Knicks.. thats not saying much.
Don't BS about Balkman, but dont BS about delusional Reezy either.
I'm just saying I've heard the whole kool-aid song and dance before. You kool-aiders do this at any pick. If we picked a pile of dirt, the kool-aiders would say that the pile of dirt was a solid pick and will one day be an all-star.
Do I think Reezy is all-star potential? Of course not. But it does seem like some fans seem to OVERRATE every player on our team, and the moment they leave our team, that player sucks. Is that pattern not painfully obvious? Is it not absurd to think that Balkman is instantly better than Ariza without having seen him play? His statistics were pitiful for someone at that slot. He's not first round talent, based on the information we do have.
However, he's already better than Ariza, apparently. How quickly the tides change.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.