Congratulations on you disagreeing with most on his defense.
No need to be obnoxious.
His .24 blocks per game speak volumes. Those are Allan Houston numbers, but from a power forward? That's the league worst for any starter.
I never claimed he was a great defensive player, but to base your opinion on his blocks per game is faulty reasoning. Here's a guy we have been talking about recently: Charles Oakley. Do you agree that he was a very good defensive player?
Charles oakley career blocks per game: .30
Carlos boozer career blocks per game: .57
Again, Oakley was a very good defensive player, Boozer is not. However, Boozer is not as a bad as you make him out to be, he is about average. Did I mention that he is a well above average offensive player and an above average rebounder?
Then you see how he has trouble keeping his man in front of him. If not for Andre Kirilenko, who is superb, the Jazz would have a ton of defensive troubles. Even Sloan came out in the media to dis Boozer's defense. Now think that Boozer has trouble defensively playing next to an utter stud like Kirilenko. Now surround him with Curry, Frye, Marbury, Francis, etc... and watch our defensive woes multiply.
At some point you have to realize that 12 guys with 15+ point potential and 0 guys who play defense is not a good formula for success.
When are you guys gonna learn that rebounding is quite important?

By the way, defensive rebounding is part of defense.
It's all about balance my man, and Boozer is a better defensive player than Eddie Curry.
oohah