The Loose Change theory is intriguing and the buildup to the conspiracy is great but there are a lot of inaccuracies. Its a very good history lesson and the producer does everyone a favor by saying "do our own research."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)#Factual_inaccuracies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)#Criticisms

Loose Change has been criticized as disinformation even by some within the 9/11 Truth Movement, which disagrees with many aspects of the official version of events on 9/11/01. [13] A primary concern of many in the movement is the promotion by documentaries such as Loose Change and In Plane Site, that a commercial jet did not hit the Pentagon. [14] [15] [16] [17]

Critics of the documentary's proposal that a cruise missile or a small aircraft may have been the cause of damage to the Pentagon, cite the nearly 100 documented accounts from witnesses on the scene [18] who reported seeing a large airliner. Some witnesses specifically noted seeing a 757, while only two witnesses, located some distance from the scene, reported seeing a small plane. Loose Change, however, does not mention the large body of witness reports in support of a commercial jet. Not a single witness at the scene has ever reported seeing a missile. [19]

[Edited by - Silverfuel on 06-21-2006 11:01 AM]

Posted by Silverfuel:

The Loose Change theory is intriguing and the buildup to the conspiracy is great but there are a lot of inaccuracies. Its a very good history lesson and the producer does everyone a favor by saying "do our own research."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)#Factual_inaccuracies
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)#Criticisms

Loose Change has been criticized as disinformation even by some within the 9/11 Truth Movement, which disagrees with many aspects of the official version of events on 9/11/01. [13] A primary concern of many in the movement is the promotion by documentaries such as Loose Change and In Plane Site, that a commercial jet did not hit the Pentagon. [14] [15] [16] [17]

Critics of the documentary's proposal that a cruise missile or a small aircraft may have been the cause of damage to the Pentagon, cite the nearly 100 documented accounts from witnesses on the scene [18] who reported seeing a large airliner. Some witnesses specifically noted seeing a 757, while only two witnesses, located some distance from the scene, reported seeing a small plane. Loose Change, however, does not mention the large body of witness reports in support of a commercial jet. Not a single witness at the scene has ever reported seeing a missile. [19]

i would wager to guess that a missile traveling at mach 3 would be a difficult thing for eyewitnesses to see, much less identify... i found the part about the entry hole caused by the supposed commercial jetliner that was made in the Pentagon was much more consistent w/a cruise missile than a huge airplane to be very interesting to say the least.

i agree, it's important for us all to do our own research, but there's definitely ALOT more than meets the eye to this entire 9/11 thing than what the US Gov't is telling us, that's for damn sure.