[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Thoughts
Author Thread
MCfan23
Posts: 20525
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2001
Member: #114
USA
10/16/2002  3:29 PM
1) I hated the trade from day one. I said I wouldn't have done it and I maintained that even when Nene picked up a groin strain and when Camby re-injured his hip. McDyess was just too much of an injury risk in my mind, to trade our only conceivable center, our starting PG and our future for. I was one of those chanting "FIRE LAYDEN," not at the announcement that we got Nene on draft day, but that we traded him to the Nuggets.

2) What happened this offseason? There were talks of Keon Clark coming here, maybe Jerome James, even Michael Olowokandi, though all were long shots. What did we end up with? Michael F'ing Doleac. Great.

3) Kurt's 6-8 or 6-9. No taller than that. He's our biggest starter. Ouch. The smallest team in the league just got smaller. And we're probably still the oldest team too.

4) Spree is going to absolutely tear it up this season, as a KNICK. He's going nowhere. No one wants him. He'll play in a Knick uni and have his best season yet in the Orange and Blue. Just you watch. He's pissed, he's gonna go nuts. He figures we suck anyway so he may as well just be even more single-minded on offense.

5) My fourth point is not necessarily a good thing, in the long run. Just like that Dice trade was a bad move, for the long run. We needed to completely rebuild, not just re-tool. We still need to, but it will be even harder to do so now. We won't be getting 7th or better pick in this year's draft. That means no LeBron. I told you, Spree iis going to go nuts and lead us to too many wins for us to get a good pick.

6) Fire Layden.
We suck.
AUTOADVERT
spencerdoobie
Posts: 20113
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2002
Member: #325
10/16/2002  4:47 PM
Posted by MCfan23:

1) I hated the trade from day one. I said I wouldn't have done it and I maintained that even when Nene picked up a groin strain and when Camby re-injured his hip. McDyess was just too much of an injury risk in my mind, to trade our only conceivable center, our starting PG and our future for. I was one of those chanting "FIRE LAYDEN," not at the announcement that we got Nene on draft day, but that we traded him to the Nuggets.

2) What happened this offseason? There were talks of Keon Clark coming here, maybe Jerome James, even Michael Olowokandi, though all were long shots. What did we end up with? Michael F'ing Doleac. Great.

3) Kurt's 6-8 or 6-9. No taller than that. He's our biggest starter. Ouch. The smallest team in the league just got smaller. And we're probably still the oldest team too.

4) Spree is going to absolutely tear it up this season, as a KNICK. He's going nowhere. No one wants him. He'll play in a Knick uni and have his best season yet in the Orange and Blue. Just you watch. He's pissed, he's gonna go nuts. He figures we suck anyway so he may as well just be even more single-minded on offense.

5) My fourth point is not necessarily a good thing, in the long run. Just like that Dice trade was a bad move, for the long run. We needed to completely rebuild, not just re-tool. We still need to, but it will be even harder to do so now. We won't be getting 7th or better pick in this year's draft. That means no LeBron. I told you, Spree iis going to go nuts and lead us to too many wins for us to get a good pick.

6) Fire Layden.



Wow dude, I agree that the knicks need to re-build, but how can you knock the Camby/Mcdyees trade? Camby is so weak, he is such a candy ass. Mark Jackson is DONE and anyone who watched knick games last year knows that. besides having no jump shot he can't guard anyone! in this day and age of scoring pg's you need a capable defender at the point. Dyess is 28 years old! This trade can't be judged yet, there is still a good chance that dyess will return and give the knicks 4-5 all-star calibur years. let's just hope he is able to work hard and get himself healthy. the jury is still out on this trade, it's easy to say it was a bad move now, but let's not pass judgement just yet.
Olowokandi was never a realistic option, keon clark is a cancer and seattle paid james a lot of bank, I agree with the knicks for not paying him that kind of money. unfortunatley for us knicks fans, doleac is what we are left with.......damn that sucks

expect the same with spree.......35 one night 12 the next.....12-17 one night 3-16 the next. expect sparadic brilliance but inconsostent performance, but he is the best chacne we have

oh.......layden should be fired, i do agree with that
knixphan
Posts: 20546
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/20/2002
Member: #258
Switzerland
10/16/2002  6:31 PM
Of course we can do MUCH better than Layden, but I would still do the trade to get (28-year-old) McDyess.

Add to that perhaps a lottery pick (or at least another chunk off the cap) and THAT'S ALL THE REBUILDING WE'RE GONNA DO. Once again, think: 'DOLAN' - think: "MSG" - think: "Impatient New Yorkers"...

2 bad years is all people will tolerate.
"I will dress in bright and cheery colors, and so throw my enemies into confusion."
MCfan23
Posts: 20525
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/23/2001
Member: #114
USA
10/18/2002  9:37 AM
it's easy to say it was a bad move now, but let's not pass judgement just yet.

I said it was a bad move the day it happened.

I know Camby is weak and Jax is nowhere near as good as he used to be, but Dice is hardly a tower of strength and we could have got a little something for Jackson.

And Nene is already a beast, with the potential to be a more skillful, better shooting version of Ben Wallace. We cou;d've built around him, and I'm pissed that we didn't.
We suck.
DaMano718
Posts: 20090
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/16/2002
Member: #342
10/18/2002  9:53 AM
The knicks have a bad record of developing new talent. In the past 20 years. The only rookies that they have developed were Patrick Ewing, aand Charlie Ward. Thats pretty sad. They have had Mark Jackson, whom was one of the best point gaurds in the league when he first started, and traded him away. They had Rod Strickland, whom they tried to get again. They had Walter McCarty, whom is doing great on the celtics. They have this infatuation with washed up veteren players, who use to be good, and now suck but they still have that all star name. Even if this season was a bust, and they end up with Lebron James, they would probably trade him for someone worthless. This team, unless they acquire a good point guard will never win. If you look at any successful team right now, they all have a good point guard. The knicks shouldve done whatever possible to trade for jason william of the bulls. Give away half their team for all I care, because building your team around a center is long gone. You need to build it around a good point guard, and surround him with players that he can make better. Until that day comes, the Knicks will never win. I dont care if you have kobe. With out someone to run the floor well, they dont have a chance.
damager
Posts: 20024
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/26/2002
Member: #265
10/18/2002  1:20 PM
I totally disagree. Yes it would be nice to have a better point guard. But you should not build your team around a point guard. So Jason Kidd made it to the finals. He lost!!! And who won the finals for the last three years with three different point guards running the show. The Lakers. And before that. The Spurs with Avery Johnson running the show. And when the knicks made it to the finals who were their point guards. Chris Childs and Charlie Ward. Not exactly all-stars. You still have to build a team around a dominant post player. With either the center or power forward position. Name the last team that has won a championship with an all-star point guard. Magic Johnson and he is a 6'9 point guard. And truly one of the greatest players in the world. I don't think Jason Williams will solve the knicks problems. He may not be the best point guard on the Bulls and he hasn't even proven himself in this league.

If you can't rebound and defend the post you don't have to worry about point guards because they will never get the ball. So stop worrying about the point guards and start worrying about getting a dominant post player. Give away half the team for Jason Williams!?!?!?!? Ok Scott Layden Jr.
DaMano718
Posts: 20090
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/16/2002
Member: #342
10/18/2002  1:52 PM
The knicks had a dominant post player for 17 years, and how many championship have they won?? hmmmmm.. thats right... You dont need magic johnson as a point guard... as for the lakers.... They dont need a point guard,.... Any scrub can bring the ball up the court and throw it into shaq for some baskets.. Kobe created his own shots, and with that combination they won a championship. What are the odds that another shaq is gonna come into the league... With the bulls, it was the same thing. You got a scrub point guard bringin the ball up, and giving it to jordan whom then set the pace. If you have a good point guard to start the rebuilding process with, than you can bring in players that can mesh with his style. And eventually bring in a dominant post player to take pressure off of the shooting guards.. Maybe I was off a litte with jay williams, but the kid was the best player in the nation in college, and was placed on the national team for the olympics. Your thinking just like Knicks management, and that why they went after mcdyss..
knixphan
Posts: 20546
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/20/2002
Member: #258
Switzerland
10/18/2002  2:21 PM
Damager has a point about the boards. If you don't dominate in rebounds, you probably don't win. In every Finals, the close ones are decided by a halfcourt duel, with difficult shots being attempted. The RODMANS, ROBINSONS and OAKLEYS of the world have proven how important glass-cleaners are to a title contender. Avery Johnson, Ron Harper- average-but-competent pg's.
"I will dress in bright and cheery colors, and so throw my enemies into confusion."
OasisBU
Posts: 24138
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/18/2002
Member: #257
USA
10/18/2002  3:26 PM
Here is what I think you need to win-
5) A glass cleaner, who can score if necessary (had the chance to grab Mutumbo, the man can rebound - he may be getting older but he can clean up still)
4) Another glass cleaner, with some post moves, and the ability to put up double digits in scoring.
3) Defense...grab any other remaining loose balls, score when the SG is slumping.
2) Points, bottom line is this guy has to score like crazy.
1) Assists, some points, and up tempo game.

So far the knicks have the pieces for 4,3,2 - granted #4 is injured but next year I have a good feeling he will be back. You do not need a center like Shaq to win, it would be nice, but you dont need your points coming from the 5...you can take them from the 4 or the 5 but you dont need both. There are many more dominant 4's in this league so I would just get a serviceable rebounder to take the middle. The PG is the quarterback of the team, any way you look at it - you have to have someone who knows what they are doing. Maybe you dont win it all based on them - but it has been easy for teams like LA and San Antonio to win because they have monsters in the middle. Without that, you need a man who can push the bass and create for you. The Knicks dont have that.
"If at first you don't succeed, then maybe you just SUCK." Kenny Powers
damager
Posts: 20024
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/26/2002
Member: #265
10/18/2002  5:41 PM
Yes we did have Patrick Ewing but that is all we had. He had no help. Jordan had Pipen. Duncan had Robinson. Shaq has Kobe. Magic even had Kareem. Ewing was by himself. He had a cba player in John Starks as the next best player. All I'm saying is you can't build a team starting with a point guard. We have a dominant post player in McDyess. So we could get any bum center. We have three scorers on the team with McDyess, Houston and Sprewell. If Ewing had any of these players in his prime the Knicks would have numerous championships. Not just two dominant players but three dominant scores.

If we add a point guard like Van X or Kidd we would have to trade away someone. Think about it.
OasisBU
Posts: 24138
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/18/2002
Member: #257
USA
10/18/2002  5:45 PM
Posted by damager:

Yes we did have Patrick Ewing but that is all we had. He had no help. Jordan had Pipen. Duncan had Robinson. Shaq has Kobe. Magic even had Kareem. Ewing was by himself. He had a cba player in John Starks as the next best player. All I'm saying is you can't build a team starting with a point guard. We have a dominant post player in McDyess. So we could get any bum center. We have three scorers on the team with McDyess, Houston and Sprewell. If Ewing had any of these players in his prime the Knicks would have numerous championships. Not just two dominant players but three dominant scores.

If we add a point guard like Van X or Kidd we would have to trade away someone. Think about it.

Exactly.
"If at first you don't succeed, then maybe you just SUCK." Kenny Powers
DaMano718
Posts: 20090
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/16/2002
Member: #342
10/18/2002  7:34 PM
Your right...
NYMase
Posts: 20006
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2002
Member: #312
10/18/2002  7:53 PM
Amen, damager...The year Ewing had a half way decent player was a past his prime Derek Harper who was awesome in 1994, and look what happened that year...Too bad we didn't have at least 3 years with Harper like that...That's actually part of my argument for why Ewing is the greatest Knick of all time...I love Clyde and Reed, but they had an incredible team...Replace Reed with Ewing and how many championships do the Knicks win? Replace Ewing with Reed and do the Knicks make the playoffs for 15 consecutive years? Does Reed like them to the championships in 94 and 99? Who knows, but I'd bet the old Knicks would have won many more championships with Ewing...
Thoughts

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy