I'll keep this short as the LB story takes precedence. Despite having so much more ability/potential than Kristic, the Knicks are light years from getting that complete a game from Curry, especially in a big game (I'm incorrectly assuming that we'll have a big game anytime soon). If its not a dunk or a 6 inch shot, Curry give us nothing. Yet another source of pathetic-ness from this team.

Yes, it's true. Krstic is better.

oohah

dont get me wrong krstic's 20/14/1, is impressive. but he doesnt really do it any more consistenly than curry does. curry's best game last season was 24/11/3, in 38 minutes. which isnt worse than what krystic did.

[Edited by - slimpack on 05-16-2006 01:23 AM]

[Edited by - slimpack on 05-16-2006 01:24 AM]

Posted by SlimPack:

I disagree, Krstic hasnty been anything special overall in this series. even curry can have 1 good game, especially one where he plays 45 minutes. then again, can curry even play that long?

[Edited by - slimpack on 05-16-2006 01:15 AM]

Krstic has had a below average series overall. Hell, Miami has a tough front line. I'm not surprised he had 3 tough games, but he has show resiliency.

It's not about his averages. It's that the guy keeps improving so rapidly. I've watched him quite a bit since last year, and he learns so quickly you can see it happening.

He'll never be the physical talent that Curry is, but as he matures physically he will lessen that gap. Skill-wise he is far and away a much better player than Curry. The knock on Krstic was his rebounding and defense and that is getting better before our eyes. He is even developing a little nasty edge. I see him as a budding star.

oohah



[Edited by - oohah on 05-16-2006 02:13 AM]