Posted by CrashDMB237:

I never understood why guys here are UK were so high on him.

Posted by bobs3304:

Curry could be Shaq Lite in the Lakers offense.

Curry is a very good low post scorer who is a turnonver machine, who can't pass to save his life and is not very good defensively.

Posted by Ira:

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by holfresh:

Let me get this straight...We should include our starting center in a trade where the guy we are after scores 1.6 PPG and grabs 1.7 rebs per game?

#1 - isiah was VERY high on bynum. in fact, he said he tried his hardest to get him on draft night b/c he would've loved to walk away with frye AND bynum.

#2 - he's 18, 5 years younger, and already in 10X better shape than curry. he also has more of a physical presence on the court.

#3 - he's a project...but at this point, what is curry other than a dunker?

#4 - when the lakers played us here at the garden, in the 4th quarter, bynum took it right at curry and he couldn't do anything about it. he posted him up, took two dribbles, turned around and hit a nice little shot. RIGHT AT curry...almost like curry wasn't even there.

#5 - with frye here, bynum can concentrate on rebounding and defense.

there are too many instances where curry is fading away and not going up strong like shaq. he doesn't have the mental makeup to take over a game and he dissapears way too often. he takes forever to get started. he can't just catch it, turn, keep the ball up and dunk it. he has to gather himself. bring the ball down like he's trying to jump start his move.

Bynum is also much more intelligent than Curry.

bynum graduated with a 3.6 GPA and a 1050 on his SAT.

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by Ira:

Posted by djsunyc:

Posted by holfresh:

Let me get this straight...We should include our starting center in a trade where the guy we are after scores 1.6 PPG and grabs 1.7 rebs per game?

#1 - isiah was VERY high on bynum. in fact, he said he tried his hardest to get him on draft night b/c he would've loved to walk away with frye AND bynum.

#2 - he's 18, 5 years younger, and already in 10X better shape than curry. he also has more of a physical presence on the court.

#3 - he's a project...but at this point, what is curry other than a dunker?

#4 - when the lakers played us here at the garden, in the 4th quarter, bynum took it right at curry and he couldn't do anything about it. he posted him up, took two dribbles, turned around and hit a nice little shot. RIGHT AT curry...almost like curry wasn't even there.

#5 - with frye here, bynum can concentrate on rebounding and defense.

there are too many instances where curry is fading away and not going up strong like shaq. he doesn't have the mental makeup to take over a game and he dissapears way too often. he takes forever to get started. he can't just catch it, turn, keep the ball up and dunk it. he has to gather himself. bring the ball down like he's trying to jump start his move.

Bynum is also much more intelligent than Curry.

bynum graduated with a 3.6 GPA and a 1050 on his SAT.

eddy was smart enough to make it look like he was gteting it together in a contract year!

Here's my take on Eddy - He could be a good piece on a good team. Two years ago when the Bulls started looking good with Gordon, Hinrich, Nocioni, Deng, Chandler et al Eddy was a good piece. This year when we had a nice streak and Marbury, AD, Frye, Nate, Ariza, Jamal and Lee were all playing well, Eddy was contributing nicely. But you have to rely on him in any way to lead the team or be the centerpiece, forget it. His skills and demeanor seem to be a complimentary piece who needs to be set up to take advantage of physical mismatches inside. And that's it.