[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

another marbury deal...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/27/2006  10:18 PM
this one to cleveland.

marbury for eric snow and drew gooden (s&t)
AUTOADVERT
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
4/27/2006  10:29 PM
Both much better ball handlers, pretty good free throw shooters and can score a few points (Gooden 15 per, Snow 9 per, both with limited minutes). Gooden is 25, Snow is 34. The question is, when does they're contracts end? I wouldn't jump at that trade right away. We have time to look around, but not too bad of a deal. I'm sure there wouldn't be any personality conflicts either. Probably Brown type people also.
I'll never trust this' team again.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/27/2006  10:30 PM 

                05/06       06/07       07/08       08/09
Eric Snow  	$5,480,000  $6,090,000  $6,700,000  $7,310,000
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
4/27/2006  10:32 PM
Not bad conceptually, but drew and Frye are redundant at best, and Frye may be the better of the two. Or would you put Frye at C and play them together? Still redundant.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
4/27/2006  10:33 PM
Three more years and he's 34? don't know about that one. Actually it would be two, with a trade for an expiring contract in two, but still. Man' dj, that was fast! You must have been waiting for me in the bushes I just passed. I thought' I heard something.
I'll never trust this' team again.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/27/2006  10:35 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

Not bad conceptually, but drew and Frye are redundant at best, and Frye may be the better of the two. Or would you put Frye at C and play them together? Still redundant.


i can't think of too many realistic scenarios in moving steph.

clips, memphis...all pipe dreams.

this is a realistic one...as is any variation of the minny ones...as is kmart.

will a winning team take a major risk on a lockerroom question mark like steph? i can't see too many that will.

[Edited by - djsunyc on 04-27-2006 10:35 PM]
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
4/28/2006  1:11 AM
Posted by djsunyc:

this one to cleveland.

marbury for eric snow and drew gooden (s&t)

nah man.....Frye is Drew Gooden with a wicked jumpshot. Eric Snow just has too many years on his contract.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/28/2006  7:44 AM
You guys are crazy, if Frye were halg the rebounder Drew Gooden was, we wouldn't be pining for guys like reggie evans.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
4/28/2006  8:57 AM
Given the minutes, frye rebounds!
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
4/28/2006  10:08 AM
Franchise is most likely going to Cleveland. They were one of the teams that were really interested in him along with the Lakers. Cleveland is also hot for Frye.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
4/28/2006  11:00 AM
Posted by BlueSeats:

Not bad conceptually, but drew and Frye are redundant at best, and Frye may be the better of the two. Or would you put Frye at C and play them together? Still redundant.

Isn't Gooden more of an SF/PF and Frye a PF/C (guarding only backup Cs)? Gooden played a lot of SF in Orlando.
Nalod
Posts: 71931
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
4/28/2006  12:12 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BlueSeats:

Not bad conceptually, but drew and Frye are redundant at best, and Frye may be the better of the two. Or would you put Frye at C and play them together? Still redundant.

Isn't Gooden more of an SF/PF and Frye a PF/C (guarding only backup Cs)? Gooden played a lot of SF in Orlando.

No. Gooden is a poor version of K-mart.

WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
4/28/2006  12:23 PM
Gooden came close to becoming a Knick last yrs feb trade deadline... It was for kurt thomas but cleveland pulled off the last minute..



That's where Ass iah felt he had to make a trade anyway so he unloaded baker/norris for Mo taylor and Nazr for rose and 29th pick.. FOOL!!
The Future. GO KNICKS!
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024
4/28/2006  12:29 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BlueSeats:

Not bad conceptually, but drew and Frye are redundant at best, and Frye may be the better of the two. Or would you put Frye at C and play them together? Still redundant.

Isn't Gooden more of an SF/PF and Frye a PF/C (guarding only backup Cs)? Gooden played a lot of SF in Orlando.

I don't know man, I think Gooden is too slow for SF, and he's got a decent midrange jumper but I don't think he has the range for SF.

And Frye is bigger, but I see them both solidly as PFs. Meaning that's how I would use them.

I like Kurt, but with the youth for age equation I think KT for Gooden would have been a fair deal for us. But I think Gooden's ceiling is well within Frye's reach.
« Reply To Topic
another marbury deal...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy