[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

why can't marbury...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
4/19/2006  9:40 PM
just play the 2 guard...you know, the same role Nate has had these last few games.

if LB does this, the team is a completely different.

It's what marbs asked for to begin the season and it would solve all of our problems.

Who better than a scoring point to play the 2?

We could start Craw at the point, or if we end up keeping Franchise, start him at the point and bring Craw and Nate off the bench.

Come to think of it, with marbs at the two, we can move Franchise to another team that's looking for a point. (lakers?)

The log jam is only QRich, he's easily a Small Forward, with Woods and JRose sharing that.

Thoughts? And lets try to be serious.
all kool aid all the time.
AUTOADVERT
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
4/19/2006  9:42 PM

Because Marbs runs the team better than any of those guys...
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
4/19/2006  9:57 PM
Posted by holfresh:


Because Marbs runs the team better than any of those guys...


this I agree with
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
4/19/2006  10:11 PM
Posted by McK1:
Posted by holfresh:


Because Marbs runs the team better than any of those guys...


this I agree with

HUWHAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!!!! While this is obviously you true, it is still no less shocking that you agreed. But yes that would be my bottom line as well. though i'd still be open to it.



[Edited by - Killa4luv on 04-19-2006 10:12 PM]

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 04-19-2006 10:12 PM]
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
4/19/2006  10:16 PM
I would love to have seen what happened to this season if Marbury didn't get injured. Larry freaked out because there was no real PG to replace Marbs and Isiah freaked out by making awful trades and Marbury just freaked out. all because Marbury was trying to fight over a pick (which he never did before LB showed up)... sigh...
¿ △ ?
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
4/19/2006  10:18 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by McK1:
Posted by holfresh:


Because Marbs runs the team better than any of those guys...


this I agree with

HUWHAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!!!!!!! While this is obviously you true, it is still no less shocking that you agreed. But yes that would be my bottom line as well. though i'd still be open to it.



[Edited by - Killa4luv on 04-19-2006 10:12 PM]

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 04-19-2006 10:12 PM]

Step is still Tuesdays trash but he is better at running a team than the other 2 stooges.

Fire Isiah

[Edited by - McK1 on 04-19-2006 10:19 PM]
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
4/19/2006  10:30 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I would love to have seen what happened to this season if Marbury didn't get injured. Larry freaked out because there was no real PG to replace Marbs and Isiah freaked out by making awful trades and Marbury just freaked out. all because Marbury was trying to fight over a pick (which he never did before LB showed up)... sigh...



Thats where it all went wrong...Just when it looked like everyone was playing hard and the Garden was chanting Larry, Larry, Larry...Marbs was putting up sick games and guiding the team with all around play..U can't tell me this franchise isn't cursed....
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
4/19/2006  10:34 PM
the problem with Marbury as a sg is he doesn't hold his own on defense- he can't get through picks/screens

And Francis is a turn over machine.

And Marbury doesn't shoot well- he can't reliably hit the outside shot- Nate has actually turned into a very good shooter.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081
4/19/2006  10:44 PM
Posted by franco12:

the problem with Marbury as a sg is he doesn't hold his own on defense- he can't get through picks/screens

And Francis is a turn over machine.

And Marbury doesn't shoot well- he can't reliably hit the outside shot- Nate has actually turned into a very good shooter.


very true and you don't want your 2 guard holding the ball as long as Marbs does...It kills me to see Francis pounding the ball as long as he does...


[Edited by - holfresh on 04-19-2006 10:45 PM]
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
4/20/2006  9:53 AM
if he played some defense on a consistent basis, i don't think LB would have a problem w/what position he played... Marbury's often playing out of the 2 role anyway... how often do you see Jamal walking the ball upcourt when they're on the floor together? i can remember plenty of times that's happened... it's not a question of what position Marbury's going to play in LB's eyes... it's more of the WAY he's playing that is the problem.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
4/20/2006  9:54 AM
i would say there's a 0.000000012% chance that marbury is back next season, with or WITHOUT lb.

isiah thomas is NOT happy with steph.
« Reply To Topic
why can't marbury...
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy