[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

NY/NO/CHI
Author Thread
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
8/27/2002  1:39 PM
New Orleans trades: C Elden Campbell (13.9 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 1.3 apg in 28.0 minutes)
New Orleans receives: SF Eddie Robinson (9.0 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 1.3 apg in 22.5 minutes)
C Dalibor Bagaric (3.7 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.5 apg in 12.8 minutes)
Change in team outlook: -1.2 ppg, -1.0 rpg, and +0.5 apg.

Chicago trades: SF Eddie Robinson (9.0 ppg, 2.7 rpg, 1.3 apg in 22.5 minutes)
PG Jamal Crawford (9.3 ppg, 1.5 rpg, 2.4 apg in 20.9 minutes)
C Dalibor Bagaric (3.7 ppg, 3.2 rpg, 0.5 apg in 12.8 minutes)
Chicago receives: PG Charlie Ward (5.2 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 3.2 apg in 63 games)
PF Othella Harrington (7.7 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 77 games)
PF Milos Vujanic (7.7 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 77 games)
Change in team outlook: -9.1 ppg, -0.9 rpg, and -0.5 apg.

New York trades: PG Charlie Ward (5.2 ppg, 2.0 rpg, 3.2 apg in 16.8 minutes)
PF Othella Harrington (7.7 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 20.3 minutes)
PF Milos Vujanic (7.7 ppg, 4.5 rpg, 0.5 apg in 20.3 minutes)
New York receives: C Elden Campbell (13.9 ppg, 6.9 rpg, 1.3 apg in 77 games)
PG Jamal Crawford (9.3 ppg, 1.5 rpg, 2.4 apg in 23 games)
--------
NO Lineup:
C: Magloire/Bagaric
PF: Brown
SF: Mash
SG: ERob/Alexander
PG: Davis

They think Magloire is ready to play C, and ERbo gives them a solid SG (Better than alexander)

---
Chicago: They get cap relief, crawford is a disappointment... im not gonna post their starting 5 becasue this is to help them get in the sweepstakes for someone next year
---
New York: Young PG, Good Center, keep KT
Then do Kt and Crawford for NVE

C: Campbell/Doleac
PF: Dice/Spoon
SF: Spree/Anderson
SG: Houston/Postell
PG: NVE/Eisley/Williams




"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
AUTOADVERT
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
8/27/2002  3:48 PM
A) I can't see Chicago doing it.
B) Why trade for Van Exel when they get Crawford? Crawford has the potential to be a great point, why not give him a chance.
#Knickstaps
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
8/27/2002  3:59 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

A) I can't see Chicago doing it.
B) Why trade for Van Exel when they get Crawford? Crawford has the potential to be a great point, why not give him a chance.
I think chicago would only do it if they are over the cap and this move would get them under the cap next year... i think they regret the erob deal and they already have jalen rose playing there..they get a good role player in O and a good PG in Milos for the future (to back up Jay or play the 1 with Jay playing the 2). by getting under the cap the have a chance to go after someone like wally who they covet next year and have a potential line up of
C: Curry/
PF: Chandler/Othella
SF: Wally/Fizer
SG: Rose
PG: Jay/Milos

along with others..thats a good young team. Better, IMO, than
C: Curry
PF: Chandler
SF: ERob
SG: Rose
PG: Jay

We don't have to do the NVE trade, but if we were playing for a championship i would, we still have a young pg in frank williams and crawford will not be as good this year as nve will be... but i agree i am not a big fan of nick
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
NY/NO/CHI

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy