Posted by Bonn1997:
It's very puzzling to me for a PG not to elevate his teammates' performance much for years 1 to 8, but then to do so at an MVP level in years 9 and 10.
I'd say
1) An *enormous* fraction of Nash's greater success in Phoenix has just been due to the different context-- the coach, the system, the teammates. Dallas ran a high octane system with Nash, but still not at the level of the Suns. To some extent it also probably has to do with having the right players surrounding him in that system, e.g. guys like Stoudemire and Marion who are finishers at the rim and on the break through and through, as opposed to Dallas's more perimeter oriented offense. Players simply do not elevate their games from borderline All-Star level to MVP level at this late of a stage in their careers in the course of one offseason-- it's not that Nash is any better than he was in Dallas, it's just that he's been in a context more condusive to his talents.
2) In any case, I would contest the claim that he's genuinely at an MVP level either last season or this season. Both last season and this season there have been players who have had a comparable level of importance in their team's offense, but who actually do other things as well, like rebound and defend. Nash is not an MVP, he is simply a very good player who has lucked into finding the perfect system for him. If Nash wins it again this season I think we'll have to go and re-write the history books for the sake of logical consistency-- the same reasoning that would elect Nash a two-time MVP should also have seen Jason Kidd winning one or two over his career, and should see John Stockton as the greatest player of all time. Stockton made a career of doing what Nash has been doing the last two seasons on offense, and on top of that he also actually played defense.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/