[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

who goes this offseason?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
mrbean259
Posts: 1484
Joined: 1/17/2005
Member: #853
with our 5 or so guards we have which one do you think is most likely to go?
marbury
francis
crawford
q-rich
nate
keep em all!
View Results


« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/10/2006  12:50 PM
Marbury getting traded would be the most significant
AUTOADVERT
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
3/10/2006  12:54 PM
Tough to say just one since i'm sure several will be shopped. I expect Crawford&Nate to be traded. Possibly marbury as well, but I'm not too sure, it depends on how he does the rest of the season.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
3/10/2006  1:05 PM
yeah out of that group I onl;y expect Francis is definitely returning.

b/n Q and Crawford whoever finishes basic training ahead of the curve.

Crawford can probably endear himself by gaing a few pounds over the last quarter of the season.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
3/10/2006  1:39 PM
Nate is probably easiest of all to trade- Isiah probably would most prefer to move Crawford since at this point, he is transitioning to bust status
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
3/10/2006  2:07 PM
thing with Craw is he has a year more and an extra 12 mill owed on his contract than Q
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
mrbean259
Posts: 21484
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2005
Member: #853
3/10/2006  2:48 PM
i see nate as the best trade value bc of his small rookie contract, while the other guys are all being overpaid...although i think hes pretty far behind them in terms of talent.
TymeLessKnicks
Posts: 21061
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/6/2005
Member: #1050
Sweden
3/10/2006  4:09 PM
everyone will go except francis and nate...maybe q stays because of defense...maybe

thats the way i see it happening
Had enough Melo?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/10/2006  4:53 PM
Posted by franco12:

Nate is probably easiest of all to trade- Isiah probably would most prefer to move Crawford since at this point, he is transitioning to bust status

He made that transition a LONG time ago. This is year SIX of disappointment.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/10/2006  6:18 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by franco12:

Nate is probably easiest of all to trade- Isiah probably would most prefer to move Crawford since at this point, he is transitioning to bust status

He made that transition a LONG time ago. This is year SIX of disappointment.


i think you're off calling the guy a bust... he clearly has the talent to be an explosive scorer... he's put up a 50 pt. game before & more than on a few occasions has put up games in the 20s & 30s... don't think u could really say that for a so-called "bust"... he hasn't lived up to the expectations just yet, i agree with you guys on that, but that doesn't mean he can't still become an allstar player in this league... he's still young enough & has demonstrated enough raw ability to say he has upside to be a better basketball player imo... i guess it all depends on your definition of the word "bust" (save the perverted jokes for another thread btw.)
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
daddynel
Posts: 21222
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 12/2/2003
Member: #505
3/10/2006  8:51 PM
why is'nt jalen in this poll?
mrbean259
Posts: 21484
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2005
Member: #853
3/10/2006  8:55 PM
i went more towards the backcourt...i see jalen pretty much as being able to solidly play the sf. while q1 can play there i think hes much better off as the sg. although im sure his expiring contract may get us something nice.
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
3/10/2006  11:05 PM
The knicks have good talent. This is just a game of who does Larry want to make his last run at a championship.

Marbs has shown he can run this team like winner then at the same time he can play like he doesn't care.

Francis' play seems to will his teamates to play better. Anybody catch that? Lots of hugs and body bumps to go around.

Q-rich is another player that the team seems to feed off of when his offense is clicking. He is a totally different player than he was 2 months ago. Its great. Knicks have yet to see him explode. Q-rich can fill it up and bring unbelievable energy to the building.

Nate got the balls.

Craw to me is the most replacable player. How can the knicks trade him somewhere? Jalen can fit jamals role better than he ever could.

But then there is the possibility that jalen can be moved. Oops! That to me doesn't affect craw at all. Craw right now is useless.

Knicks needs are right on the roster. The knicks need a true small fwd? Woods is just waiting his turn. Knicks got lee and butler to provide the lunch pale. Frye is gonna be the favorite to start for the next 10 years. Curry has plenty to prove and will have a summer to prove himself.

So now what? How am I supposed to know? Like I said this is browns game...we are just supposed to wait and see.
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/10/2006  11:59 PM
I see no way that steph will be traded. I can't think of too many teams that would want to take on his rep and contract. Its just not gonna happen, so all you Steph haters can just stop dreamin.

Unless there's a deal for KG or Jermaine O'Neal or Al Harrington, I don't think we'll see much change on this roster. I think all this talk about change is premature. At best we really only need a shotblocker and a Pure shooting Guard. We could use a Pure PG, but even if we didn't get one I think getting the other two players is more important. We may just be able to acquire what we need without moving any of our key players.

Next year at some point we could be looking at a rotation of Steph, QRich, Woods, Frye & Curry and Francis, Jamal, Lee and Butler off the bench. Rather than make more trades I say just pick up some kids in the draft that fit the description and go from there. The only trades worth making at this point are the big ones I mentioned earlier, otherwise I don't really think anything else will make much of a difference.
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
3/11/2006  3:14 AM
Posted by nixluva:

I see no way that steph will be traded. I can't think of too many teams that would want to take on his rep and contract. Its just not gonna happen, so all you Steph haters can just stop dreamin.

why would you feel that if people think marbury is getting traded, they are haters... people are being realistic, he will get traded this summer. you watch!!

Time for him to go... As pg of the knicks, they've only acccumulated 17 wins and we're in mid march..


MArbury doesn't make his players better....
The Future. GO KNICKS!
mrbean259
Posts: 21484
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/17/2005
Member: #853
3/11/2006  12:32 PM
realistically though what do you think the knicks can get for marbury with his big contract?
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
3/12/2006  3:29 AM
Posted by mrbean259:

realistically though what do you think the knicks can get for marbury with his big contract?

Marbs can't pull anybody making what he makes. ....and the Knicks don't have room for multiple players that would come in a realistic Marbs trade.

Isiah has moved mountains before but i think he is just stuck with marbs for now
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
« Reply To Topic
who goes this offseason?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy