Posted by simrud:
Earl we did not have a discussion because you have not made a point outside of these 3:
1)The team is turning it around, or, the team is about to turn it around, or the team has turned it around, etc. That is not an argument, that is just an opinion unbaked by any facts. Tell why you feel like they are, have, or someday will turn it around w/out major changes to the management philosophy, taka the Rangers.
2)It can't be IT's fault, once again, explain why. He has an awful track record, and his job here speaks for itself. Give one place outside of his playing days in Detroit where he had any kind of success.
3)IT gets a harder time being a GM cause he is black. This is just not true. And a copout as well. I'm sure some people out there dislike that a black man is in a position of power, but I can assure neither me, not anybody on this forum feel that way.
So please feel free to make a statement backed by fact, free of innuendos and character assaults, something that doesn’t smack of propaganda bull horning.
Personally, I'm not certain mister.earl is right about the Knicks "turning it around," (I certainly hope so) but I do think any student of history should know that race has been a factor in people's views of others for a VERY LONG TIME, no matter what people may say. Ask the people of the Montgomery City Government during the Bus Boycott or any "good ol' boy" from "the South" if they thought segregation was racist, and you'd be sure to hear them all say no. Today, it's a mostly a different story because racism is not as easy to see for many white people, so it's easier to deny it exists in other forms other than the most blatant, and even easier when it involves wealthy, non-white sport figures who are often the target of class/race based resentment.
This is not to say all of the criticism of Isiah is based in racist ideaology, because clearly his job performance is worth questioning, as anyone else would with the record of this team over 2+ years. However, history tells us that white people have often been more comfortable with criticizing non-white people in positions of power than white folk. Paternalism and a sense of superiority is what is often suspected of white people when they freely criticize non-whites with some power or wealth, because HISTORICALLY this is what has occured. Does that mean this is automatically the fundamental force behind criticism of non-whites from white people? I believe it is difficult to say because with everyone it is different, but the suspicion is there whether white people like it or not, so maybe it's worth thinking about these patterns rather than dismissing them as ridiculous.
Any scientist or researcher has to take into consideration all of the facts before passing judgement, so to deny that racism MAY play some kind of role in Isiah's criticism seems rather selective and lacking in introspective thought.
[Edited by - PresIke on 03-12-2006 4:10 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...