[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Marbury or Francis
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
2/27/2006  5:29 PM
When this offseason arrives who would you rather keep and why?

Personally i'd keep francis...he isnt as great as marbury but he seems much more spirited and emotional on the floor...when a couple of our guys missed shots or picked up fouls he was talking to them and letting them know what was wrong...im hoping marbury is out with his shoulder injury for a while to see how the team meshes with francis
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
AUTOADVERT
jaydh
Posts: 22817
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
2/27/2006  5:30 PM
who knows, lets see what francis can do for us before writing marbury off.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/27/2006  5:34 PM
ugh. what a choice. I would say Marbury, but everyone on the team seems to hate him. for once I'd like to build with team chemistry in mind.
¿ △ ?
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
2/27/2006  5:39 PM
i dont hate marbury....i just noticed how steve communicates with players on the floor instead of sulking...i eve said marbury is better than steve
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
2/27/2006  5:54 PM
Francis is a lot more attactive and gets the team more involved and makes things happen. good to see people finally understanding what people mean when they say Marbury doesn't make teammates better and doesn't run plays and make the right passes.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
2/27/2006  6:25 PM
francis of course.
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060
2/27/2006  6:29 PM
For team chemistry purposes alone, you would have to deal Marbury first.
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/27/2006  6:46 PM
trade Marbury... that experiment has been a complete & utter failure... i'll take my chances w/Francis (not all that much better an option, but at least i hear positive things about him from his past teammates & coaches)
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/27/2006  11:07 PM
I think Marbury's a much better passer and has a better jump shot and Francis has a less unattractive contract. I'd trade Francis unless the rumors about Marbury not getting along with teammates are accurate.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 02-27-2006 11:07 PM]
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/27/2006  11:13 PM
what do u mean "rumors"? they're facts when you hear ex-teammates come out publically saying how much happier they are playing with the guy who replaces him... they're facts when you have a guy on your own team waiting hours to kick your arse after practice & having to be told to go home by his sister (as Steven A. Smith reported on his radio show the other day)... there's no "rumors" of anything concerning Marbury... he's not a leader & he's never going to be liked by his teammates.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/27/2006  11:17 PM
If you want to play uptempo, francis is the easy choice....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/27/2006  11:19 PM
I was just referring to this team, not the past when Marbury was more immature. The SAS rumor is alarming and hopefully just a false rumor. I agree that he's not a leader and probably never will be. I think based on his history, Francis also is not a leader and never will be.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
2/27/2006  11:19 PM
If Larry is staying, Steph should probably go.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/27/2006  11:20 PM
Posted by tkf:

If you want to play uptempo, francis is the easy choice....
That's a good point. Francis also has less milage on his legs since he's played fewer seasons even though they're the same age. I'm not crazy about keeping either but I definitely don't think we should keep both.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/27/2006  11:27 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by tkf:

If you want to play uptempo, francis is the easy choice....
That's a good point. Francis also has less milage on his legs since he's played fewer seasons even though they're the same age. I'm not crazy about keeping either but I definitely don't think we should keep both.


Yea, I mean francis was drafted what in 2000? just a year ahead of curry, he is much fresher than marbury, Steve still has springs, and a lot of energy in those legs, although the same age, steve is a much younger 29 than marbury, just like Ben wallace is a much younger 31 than malik rose....
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
edsonline
Posts: 20345
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/12/2004
Member: #735
2/28/2006  12:00 AM
Makes a lot more sense to keep them and build around those two, Frye, and Curry. Screw the rest of this team.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
2/28/2006  12:10 AM
francis is easier to get along with.

better rebounder.

more versatile.

more clutch.


im takin francis.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
edsonline
Posts: 20345
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/12/2004
Member: #735
2/28/2006  12:23 PM
The chances of getting somebody as good or better when trading Marbury and/or Francis is slim and none. Makes more sense to keep them and get right players/system around them (and Frye and Curry). And Francis' rep around the league is just as bad as Marbury's, maybe even worse. So all of this Francis is better for chemistry stuff is hilarious.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/28/2006  2:26 PM
Posted by edsonline:

The chances of getting somebody as good or better when trading Marbury and/or Francis is slim and none. Makes more sense to keep them and get right players/system around them (and Frye and Curry). And Francis' rep around the league is just as bad as Marbury's, maybe even worse. So all of this Francis is better for chemistry stuff is hilarious.
but he's new!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/28/2006  2:36 PM
1 thing we do know is that Marbury can't lead this team to squat... i think that's why people are saying they'd prefer Francis at this point... the whole Marbury experiment has clearly been a failure.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
« Reply To Topic
Marbury or Francis
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy