[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

if we're going to trade nate, we should do it next monday
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/12/2006  1:40 PM
coming off the rookie game and the dunk contest, his value will be at an all-time high.

i don't want to trade him. i still think lb loves the kid even if he's dumb as rocks. but IF we're gonna do it, his value will not be higher than after all-star weekend.

i think we have to package him with jerome as that may be the only way to dump that big piece of turd. primary target would be seattle but nate may have more value than reggie. (nate + jerome for reggie + fortson + pick?)

other possibility would be nate + q1 for al harrington. unless we do something crazy and somehow wind up with maggette.

both teams will bite as they need to sell tickets.
AUTOADVERT
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
2/12/2006  1:55 PM
Damn keep Nate. He's a guy who can change the pace of a game, get some steals, score a bunch of quick baskets, pump up the crowd and his teammates, stroke a few hands. He's hyper as hell but that can be leveraged.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/12/2006  1:56 PM
how about we keep all the kids and see what we have when Marbury gets back?

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/12/2006  1:57 PM
I have a nasty feeling that Q is going to be humiliated in the 3pt contest. has anyone ever missed all their shots? with his back shot he has no lift on his J anymore, it's sad.
¿ △ ?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/12/2006  2:01 PM
Posted by Marv:

Damn keep Nate. He's a guy who can change the pace of a game, get some steals, score a bunch of quick baskets, pump up the crowd and his teammates, stroke a few hands. He's hyper as hell but that can be leveraged.

i agree 100%. like you said, i think he's like lb's pet project. the problem is that this entire team is a project. does he have the time to cultivate nate as well? it looks like he will require alot of attention.
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
2/12/2006  2:33 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

how about we keep all the kids and see what we have when Marbury gets back?


i'm all for that.. we will be a much better team with a healthy marbs and jalen in the lineup.
Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
2/12/2006  2:42 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

how about we keep all the kids and see what we have when Marbury gets back?

i like that idea

"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
2/12/2006  2:43 PM
Posted by Bobby:
Posted by crzymdups:

how about we keep all the kids and see what we have when Marbury gets back?

i like that idea

We have the same team with the subtraction of AD and the addition of Jalen Rose...let's make a deal.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
2/12/2006  2:48 PM
If we do make a trade for Earl Watson, I really can't see Nate getting any playing time. So I guess now would be a good time to try to trade him for a young forward or 2 guard. I guess with Larry being around it will be difficult for and young player to stay on our team.

[Edited by - BigC on 02-12-2006 4:46 PM]
BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
2/12/2006  3:04 PM
I have to say the most surprising thing about Nate is that he has virtually no point guard abilities whatsoever...I was under the impression that since he was a small guy he could automatically play that position if needed. He can't.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
2/12/2006  3:06 PM
If we 're gonna trade one of the rookies, it should be NAte.. He's 5'9 and limtied to one position which he cannot play well(pg).

Lee and Frye are big men which they should not trade away..

Knicks are in desperate need of a back-up pg.. No one other than marbury can play point
The Future. GO KNICKS!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/12/2006  3:25 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
i think we have to package him with jerome as that may be the only way to dump that big piece of turd.

i like the sound of that... from here on out, i will refer to JJ as "The Big Turd"

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
2/12/2006  4:15 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by djsunyc:
i think we have to package him with jerome as that may be the only way to dump that big piece of turd.

i like the sound of that... from here on out, i will refer to JJ as "The Big Turd"

You had to go there.

Fine.

Then you should know that in Seatle they're still erecting monuments to the legacy of Jerome"Big Turd " James!
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
2/12/2006  4:21 PM
What does Nate need to do to stick around? He's a rookie and has one of the best 3pt shooting percentages in the league. All three of these guys will ba nasty next year. They have looked better than most of the rookies in the league so far. Why trade them? You'd have to get something amazing back.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
Swishfm3
Posts: 23328
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/28/2003
Member: #392
2/13/2006  7:35 AM
Every small guard that has played in the NBA has had a successful career
Seanc3
Posts: 20164
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/24/2005
Member: #920
USA
2/13/2006  12:01 PM
I agree with djsunyc Monday will be the perfect time to deal Nate even if he loses.
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/18/2006  11:12 PM
what's the verdict? trade him or not?

my stance as a fan? do not trade nate. i'd like to see what he can develop into.

milli vanilli's stance? i have no use for nate, he requires too much work. let's trade him for reggie evans.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/18/2006  11:14 PM
I doubt Dolan would let Isiah trade him unless it was for something outstanding. Nate's gonna sell a lot of jerseys. Probably 2nd most on the team behind Marbury.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 02-18-2006 11:15 PM]
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
2/18/2006  11:22 PM
nah i dont see him being traded......i think dolan wouldnt let zeke trade him....maybe wit nates win we'll slowly cimb back to respectability
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
2/18/2006  11:50 PM
Isiah has gotten fleeced in virtually every trade he has made. I dread any trade.
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
if we're going to trade nate, we should do it next monday
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy