billups gp gs min fg% 3fg% ft% to reb ast pts
02-03 Det 74 74 31.4 .421 .392 .878 1.8 3.7 3.9 16.2
03-04 Det 78 78 35.4 .394 .388 .878 2.4 3.5 5.7 16.9
04-05 Det 80 80 35.8 .442 .426 .898 2.3 3.4 5.8 16.4
crawford gp gs min fg% 3fg% ft% to reb ast pts
04-05 Nyk 70 67 38.4 .398 .361 .843 2.1 2.9 4.3 17.7
05-06 Nyk 47 14 33.3 .402 .349 .827 2.3 3.2 4.0 14.0
the bold portion is the year lb became the coach. there are some similarities between the two players. brown began coaching billups at age 26, while crawford is at 25. i was pretty surprised to see billups shooting %'s worse than crawford's. obviously, billups looked better b/c of his supporting cast, especially frontcourt players. all this while crawford wasn't the starting pg of this team.
i guess the point i'm trying to make is that statistically, at this point in their perspective careers, they both are at similar places when lb became their coach. things don't look great now but who's to say crawford won't blossom like chauncy did if given the starting pg job permanently? of course, that's pure speculation and we can only revisit this after the fact...