1-Malik Rose to Portland for Ruben Patterson. I'm sure the Blazers would accept.
2-Jamal Crawford, Trevor Ariza and NY 2nd round pick (around 30-35 overall) for Gerald Wallace and Brevin Knight.
3-Quentin Richardson, Nate Robinson and SA pick for Jason Richardson.

I know Gerald Wallace is injured, in fact that is why the trade could work. I also know we would end up with no draft picks, but I really don't care. I just don't want the bulls to get a top 5 pick.

Curry/James/Butler
Frye/Lee/Taylor
Woods/Wallace
Richardson/Patterson
Marbury/Knight
I'm VERY disappointed with Larry Brown. If he had this team, play the ****ing line-up you want, but win the damned games! If can't win half of the games with that roster he should simply quit coaching, because this is a 50 win roster.
After all those sleepless night I'm getting by watching the Knicks I did not imagine that we would be that awful. And I still think that some of our players are really good. We are not a 50 wins teams, but are certainly MUCH better than a lottery team.

I see your thinking, but except for Patterson I dont think those are good trades

Whoa - you guys surprise me. You wouldn't jump all over the JRich deal? He's not a bonafide stud 2-guard? What am I missing here in evaluating him?

Posted by Marv:

Whoa - you guys surprise me. You wouldn't jump all over the JRich deal? He's not a bonafide stud 2-guard? What am I missing here in evaluating him?

He's a stud on offense who plays "Jamal Crawford-type" defense

Posted by Nalod:


Trade three is pipedream. They would never do that unless they value Nate more than I do. A lot more.

Of course if I'm the Warriors GM I would not accept it, but hey, wait until Q wins the 3 point contest and Crawford scores 30 in a game and everything is possible.



[Edited by - DarkKnicks on 02-01-2006 09:37 AM]

Posted by Nalod:

Funny, Baron and Marbs are very similar.

JRich with Baron is a stud.

On paper the Warriors look even better than the Knicks. And it ain't working there.

Trade one is doable.
Trade two makes sense because the 'Cats need a Two badly. Real bad. But I can almost see them waiting the season out. They ain't going no where with Craw.

Trade three is pipedream. They would never do that unless they value Nate more than I do. A lot more.

IMO Mike Montgomery gives Baron and Fish too much leeway. Thats a team made for a Larry Brown as he is now. Only thing they need direction in is patience.

[Edited by - McK1 on 02-01-2006 09:40 AM]

I would do all three without hesitation, your adding incredible defense at the three position, and a scorer that would go perfect alongside Marbury, and J-Rich can be traded, people have interest in him.....

Baron is too selfish thats why its not working in Golden State......Crawford is a turnover who take terrible shots, and doesn't play defense no thanks.....

Richardson is a 6'6 version of Nate, and Wallace and Paterson bring what we need some balls.....that team is fun to watch and has something...

Marbury/10 day contract who cares
Richardson
Wallace/Paterson
Frye/Lee
Curry/whoever

Wallace is the neares thing to AK47 outside of Utah

wow, talk about hyperbole... Josh Howard is alot closer to AK47 than Gerald Wallace will ever be... right now Gerald Wallace is no closer to being AK47 than Luol Deng & Mikael Pietrus are... they all still need to develop their games, but they also have talent & potential no doubt.