Why are winning and getting better mutually exclusive?
Brown is all about getting better, he'd like to see progression on a upward climb. His teams always get better. It's just how he is. So if it means breaking the team down to lottery and always being better from there, then so be it.
Browns teams usually do get better with time--especially when his personnel improves like at Detroit and Philly.
So, would we rather have a .500 record, never getting blown out, some big games by marbs while the rest of the team just stays in the shadow?
That would be bad.
Or do we prefer a team that is ripping out the foundation and starting from scratch with youth.
Is that what is really happening?
Are those the only two options?
oohah