[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

do you guys think we're going to see less and less of the rooks?
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
1/27/2006  12:10 PM
i ask this b/c with the distractions going on with isiah, along with our poor record, do you think that lb feels a little pressure to try to win some more games now to deflect some of the criticisms going isiah's way? if that's the case, i can see him going with the vets more and more for the time being trying to win a few, at the behest of giving the rooks some actual in game play. i think we're going to see the rooks pulled much quicker after mistakes.

i could be wrong but i wouldn't be surprised. granted, they haven't really seized the opportunity and forced lb's hand. i wonder what we're going to do with q1?
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/27/2006  12:12 PM
it's funny, when Larry is in "must win" mode with this team, the results are disastrous. when he gives up and decides the season is over and it's time to play the rooks around new year's, we reel off six wins in a row. the vets on this team outside of Marbury suck.

though Larry claims the rooks are tired and Frye certainly looks it right now.
¿ △ ?
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
1/27/2006  12:13 PM
I would hope not, otherwise this will truly be a lost season.

I don't think they will win anymore games with these veterans anyway.

My guess is that the rooks will soon be getting major PT again.
JimmyV
Posts: 20033
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/27/2006
Member: #1087

1/27/2006  1:03 PM
but our vets aren't much better than the youth...
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
1/27/2006  2:31 PM
but our vets aren't much better than the youth...

To the contrary, our vets are generally worse than our youth...and that is the among worst part of this whole mess.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/27/2006  2:41 PM
I dont think so, I think the reason the rookies' minutes have been limited lately is becuase of fatigue.
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
1/28/2006  12:50 PM
I think as guys play well they will play. With Qyntel playing well, David is going to lose time. When he starts to outplay Qyntel then Q will lose time. Channing's minutes don't fluctuate that much. That leaves Nate. I think most of us agree that of all the young guys he is the guy that is going to lose minutes first because of his poor decision making. Of all the guys he is the guy that most needs to learn from the bench. We need to get off the mentality that the only way to develop is to play. You develop by listening to the coaching staff, then you get better, THEN YOU PLAY. That's how sports have been done for decades. Why is it that minor league baseball, hockey and pro football players ride the pine til they are ready but rookies who aren't performing in basketball deserve minutes. I don't get it.
I just hope that people will like me
do you guys think we're going to see less and less of the rooks?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy