[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Do you want Jalen Rose?


Author Poll
BasketballJones
Posts: 11973
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
Is the proposed deal that would bring Jalen Rose to the Knicks a good one? Given the impact rose would make on the team (both good and bad) is this a good deal, or is it more of the same old same old?
Yes, get Rose and James and cut back the rookies' minutes
No, keep things as they are
View Results


Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/23/2006  8:16 PM
I voted yes because I think the only person that has a viable risk to get his minutes cut is Nate. Jalen will play the two here IMO.
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/23/2006  8:31 PM
I say get rose simply becuase things couldnt possible get any worse from what they already are.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/23/2006  8:40 PM
I say keep things as they are because acquiring rose would be reverting to the Knicks foolish "win (a little more) now" philosophy.
https:// It's not so hard.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/23/2006  8:42 PM
Posted by BasketballJones:

I say keep things as they are because acquiring rose would be reverting to the Knicks foolish "win (a little more) now" philosophy.
If the deal doesn't include Mike James and the 1st rd pick, you're right. Otherwise, I'd disagree. We'd be getting the best players in the deal, including a great role player for many years in James and a 1st rd pick.

simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
1/23/2006  8:44 PM
Don't give a flying f@ck should be an option.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/23/2006  8:44 PM
I can see where you can form that opinion, jones, but i look at it differently...If we pull this trade, we get a 1st round pik and a better player.....at the cost of money. If we do this we can quite possibly have 6 guys (at least) 24 and younger on this roster, another two or three between 25 and 28.

He is rebuilding as he is trying to stay afloat. Granted the team isn't really staying afloat. But even if we do this trade it is not reverting to the old win now pay later philosophy we had.
~You can't run from who you are.~
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/23/2006  8:51 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BasketballJones:

I say keep things as they are because acquiring rose would be reverting to the Knicks foolish "win (a little more) now" philosophy.
If the deal doesn't include Mike James and the 1st rd pick, you're right. Otherwise, I'd disagree. We'd be getting the best players in the deal, including a great role player for many years in James and a 1st rd pick.

mike james wont be around for many years. if he keeps playing the way he has been playing he will command more than the MLE.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/23/2006  9:00 PM
Posted by simrud:

Don't give a flying f@ck should be an option.



please add
C) Don't give a flying f@ck

as per simrud.

Thank you.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/23/2006  9:14 PM
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by BasketballJones:

I say keep things as they are because acquiring rose would be reverting to the Knicks foolish "win (a little more) now" philosophy.
If the deal doesn't include Mike James and the 1st rd pick, you're right. Otherwise, I'd disagree. We'd be getting the best players in the deal, including a great role player for many years in James and a 1st rd pick.

mike james wont be around for many years. if he keeps playing the way he has been playing he will command more than the MLE.

Then we'll give it to him!
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/23/2006  9:23 PM
yes- assuming we're getting a first round pick- and why does this mean we're cutting back rookies minutes?

I would see this as cutting into Q's minutes- and I don't see that as a bad thing...
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
1/23/2006  10:06 PM
we almost have to do this if we get the pick
- that would mean though that
1) we'd have to trade Lee or Ariza
- one or the other will not play with Rose on the team

2) we'd have to let Antonio expire
- we have to at least dump some salary this year

If Q ever gets going I could see us getting on a roll with this trade, if not we'll just be marginally better with Rose.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/23/2006  11:03 PM
Posted by simrud:

Don't give a flying f@ck should be an option.


Sorry - can't edit a poll after its posted. I usually include "other", but I forgot this time.

https:// It's not so hard.
mikesknicks
Posts: 20755
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/17/2004
Member: #684
USA
1/24/2006  9:55 AM
quote:
Originally posted by simrud:

Don't give a flying f@ck should be an option.



If you don't care don't Post. Simple.
In the Knick of time. Knickal for Your thoughts.
TemujinKnick
Posts: 20771
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/3/2005
Member: #1022

1/24/2006  10:02 AM
Posted by BasketballJones:
Posted by simrud:

Don't give a flying f@ck should be an option.


Sorry - can't edit a poll after its posted. I usually include "other", but I forgot this time.

Has switching these forums to vBulletin been considered?
Do you want Jalen Rose?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy