[ IMAGES: Images OFF turn on | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Crawford's head will never be out of his arse!!
Author Thread
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/19/2006  11:14 PM
-He played probably the worlds worst defense on Rip Hamilton. How many open layups did he waltz by Craw to get?

-The only reason Rip didn't have 100 is because it was a blowout.

-Craw was our 2nd option on offense tonight and what did he do? He played 38 minutes, 2 points, 3 assists, and 3 turnovers.

Thanx Craw.

What is this 3 or 4 games in a row? I can't remember. I do know that I can remember writing a similar rant maybe 2 weeks ago when this guy scored 0 points, somebody was talking about Luke Ridenhour, and a couple of other people were talking about how smoothly the offense ran with Crawford runnung it. Yeah, smooth. 8 turnovers in 2 games worth of smooth. This guy ****ing sucks. I cant believe how some of you hyped him up. i think we can all see why LB doesn't start this guy. 2 points? 1-6 and you are the second option? As many TO's as assists? Thanks for doing your best Jaque Vaughn impression.

Craw is who we live or die by. When he plays well, we are pretty much in every game. When he sucks, we are almost certain to lose. Craws head will never come out of his ass.
AUTOADVERT
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/19/2006  11:17 PM
those are good points, but Im a bit hesitant to give up on him because he played 52 minutes last night. also he's been playing out of position the last couple of games.
EnySpree
Posts: 44917
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

1/19/2006  11:22 PM
[IMG_block] http://dtfb.org/head-up-ass.gif [/IMG_block]

I had to bring it back......
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC?t=z5pqPMhdiAZNwzcCGMkiFw&s=09
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/19/2006  11:25 PM
when Marbury is out it effects every single person on this team, but Crawford the most. Sure he's not ready to be the player and leader Marbury is. Wow. Deep observation.
¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/19/2006  11:26 PM
....against the best team in the league...PFFFFFT.
¿ △ ?
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/19/2006  11:28 PM
Posted by SlimPack:

those are good points, but Im a bit hesitant to give up on him because he played 52 minutes last night. also he's been playing out of position the last couple of games.

WHAT IS HIS FREAKING POSITION?!?!?!?!?!?

Granted 52 minutes is alot of minutes, but 2 points and 3 assists is unacceptable. The dude has been playing poorly without any legitmate excuses, but I will give him something for that. But we all know its much bigger than the ot game and fatigue. This is just how Craw gets down. He is one of those inconsistant players, period.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/19/2006  11:31 PM
this is their 4th game in 5 night, they were missing two starters including their best player and they were playing the best team in the league, who just might have wanted to embarass their former coach on national TV. what did you think was gonna happen?
¿ △ ?
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/19/2006  11:36 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

this is their 4th game in 5 night, they were missing two starters including their best player and they were playing the best team in the league, who just might have wanted to embarass their former coach on national TV. what did you think was gonna happen?

So because they are the best its ok for him to score 2 points? Come on man, don't be ridiculous.
Because 4 games in 5 nights? He was doing this before we even came along this far. He has been doing this all season. If this was the first time I'd agree with you, but at this point I think it has less to do with those excuse, and more to do with him.

In these games here are his points:
Wash(4)
GSW(2)
Cha(4)
Bos(2)
Mil(0)
Orl(3)
Min(4)

Thats 7 out of 35 games hes played where he has less than 5 points. 20% of the games he's played.

Its not just that he played against the best team in the league.

Its not just that he played alot of minutes the night before.

Its that he has done this MANY times before against some sucky ass defensive teams. I mean who is guarding him in the above games?
Is Ron Artest getting traded from team to team to guard him all oever the NBA?



[Edited by - Killa4luv on 01-19-2006 11:38 PM]

[Edited by - Killa4luv on 01-19-2006 11:39 PM]
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/19/2006  11:39 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by crzymdups:

....against the best team in the league...PFFFFFT.

So because they are the best its ok for him to score 2 points? Come on man, don't be ridiculous.

In these games here are his points:
Wash(4)
GSW(2)
Cha(4)
Bos(2)
Mil(0)
Orl(3)
Min(4)

Thats 7 out of 35 games hes played where he has less than 5 points. 20% of the games he's played.

Its not just that he played against the best team in the league.

Its not just that he played alot of minutes the night before.

Its that he has done this MANY times before against some sucky ass teams. I mean who is guarding him in the above games?
Is Ron Artest getting traded from team to team to guard him all oever the NBA?

When Crawford scores we win. He's had to adjust to Larry Brown's system all season. Somehow with all these low scoring games, he leads the NBA in points off the bench.

It's pretty easy to kick the guy when he's been forced into the starting lineup after grooving off the bench. it's easier still to pick on him after the Knicks lose to the best team in the league without Marbury. nice job.
¿ △ ?
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
1/19/2006  11:40 PM
knicks are 8-4 when craw scores over 20 pts
5-21 when he scores under 20
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/19/2006  11:40 PM
Posted by Killa4luv:
Posted by SlimPack:

those are good points, but Im a bit hesitant to give up on him because he played 52 minutes last night. also he's been playing out of position the last couple of games.

WHAT IS HIS FREAKING POSITION?!?!?!?!?!?

SG,

[Edited by - slimpack on 01-19-2006 11:42 PM]
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/19/2006  11:43 PM
Crazy Dumps. you should be in his entourage, you've got an excuse for every occasion.

I'm not picking on him, just making an observation. He is wildly inconsistant, you can offer me whatever excuses you like, but thats my take.

Yeah he has the most 20 pt games off the bench (9).

The problem is he has counter balanced that with 7 games with less than 5. Thats all I'm saying. I like him and think he's a good player, you just can't count on him for anything becaue you don't know what you're gonna getfrom him. Its hard to win like that our team isn't good enough to handle that.


[Edited by - Killa4luv on 01-19-2006 11:45 PM]
BlueSeats
Posts: 27272
Alba Posts: 41
Joined: 11/6/2005
Member: #1024

1/19/2006  11:51 PM
JC is woefully inconsistent. The hope was if he took his game closer to the rim it would mitigate some of his streaky shooting, but his inconsistencies seem to stem from something deeper than just crappy shot selection.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27768
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/19/2006  11:53 PM
Posted by BlueSeats:

JC is woefully inconsistent. The hope was if he took his game closer to the rim it would mitigate some of his streaky shooting, but his inconsistencies seem to stem from something deeper than just crappy shot selection.

I'd rather him shoot wide open jumpers than take it to the rim. His game in the lane is inconsistant and he rarely draws contact or fouls. Whats the point? If he's open and his feet are set he should shoot it, imo, I think thats the best way to use him.
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/19/2006  11:56 PM
I think what's emerging, in addition to woeful D on this team, is bad ball handling. I think the Knicks are fairly well set with bigs, and Marbury has won me over with his recent play.

But I don't think we can handle both Crawford AND Nate. One or the other will suffice. Go out and get a decent backup point guard - someone who knows how to take care of the ball.

Of the Knicks' 20 turnovers, Nate had 7, Jamal had 4 and Ariza had 4. These are the guys we're counting on to take care of the ball?

Also, I'm beginning to think Q is "done".



[Edited by - BASKETBALLJONES on 01-20-2006 12:07 AM]
https:// It's not so hard.
lovespree
Posts: 20310
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/1/2001
Member: #53
USA
1/20/2006  7:50 AM
Craw is way to inconsist. 2 points for 52 minutes? That's completly absurd! Losing is one thing, but those number completly blow - and his defense sucked! It's all mental with him. He has the ability.
NY KNICKS 4 EVER! Will we ever find players like Anthony Mason, Xavier McDaniels, Patrick Ewing again? I hope so.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/20/2006  9:08 AM
we need for him to go back to being the 6th man... i would start Q Rich & get him going early... let Craw come off the bench where he's become comfortable over the past few weeks... if you keep shifting him from being a starter to a reserve, it'll mess w/his psyche... he needs to stop thinking about his role & just go out on the floor & play his game.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/21/2006  5:53 PM
Maybe Crawford will always be inconsistent but one stat that represents a wonderful improvement is his FTAs. Last year, per 48 min he attempted 3.9 FTs; this year it's 6.9.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/21/2006  5:59 PM
that points to him being more aggressive going to the hole, which is what LB has been trying to get him to do, which means he's learning & changing his game to suit what LB expects out of him... he's been rebounding better & for the most part, his effort on defense has been better, if not consistent... he's not going to become an elite defender overnight... i give him more time... but i do think he's more suited to the 6th man role on this team... it's tough tho w/Marbury out... Nate can't run an offense, so LB needs Craw on the floor.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/21/2006  6:25 PM
I am 150% fine with the role Crawford has had on offense and the way he has played. If it's as 6th man, fine. It's the defense that's hurting my feelings.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Crawford's head will never be out of his arse!!

©2001-2012 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy