Posted by djsunyc:
yes, let's take a one game sample...the first time all year they played without marbury for more than a 5 minute stretch and consider it theory. btw, watch the first half again, nate played more point than crawford. but once nate went out with foul problems, we settled down. but i also noticed that we got it together and put together a late run to get back into it...with nothing but the young guys - frye, lee, nate, and jamal and AD leading them. tough game, tough loss.
btw, 19&8 is AWFULLY close to 20&8...
how about this one killa - we play WITH steph as the starting pg in toronto and get blown out.
but you notice how much tougher and more energetic we look WITHOUT steph down the stretch of these past two games.
so 3 games, 3 losses...but only one BLOWOUT...and that was WITH marbury. hmmmm.
is there any doubt why a $20 mil pg is not a difference maker?
[Edited by - djsunyc on 01-19-2006 12:09 AM]
Aren't you the same guy who was proclaiming Crawford had become consistant after playing well in 1 game? Don't make me find it.
Aren't you the same one....no, I'm saving that for another day. But my earlier point still stands.
We have now been blown out by the leagues best team, but we previously played tham IN Detroit and lost by all of 8 points.