Posted by AkiliNYK:
Personally I like Lee better starting at the 4 than Frye yes Frye can score but Lee's rebounding, Defence, and Hustle are Leaps and bounds ahead of Fryes. Also Lee is working on his offence if the kid continues to progress as he is he will be better than Frye and stronger. I would love to see
C:Curry
PF:Lee
SF:Artest(Dream but I would give up Frye, Nate for him)
SG: WE need one
PG: Marbury
6th JC
7th Mo or Frye is we dont trade him
8th NAte
9th Richardson.
[Edited by - AkiliNYK on 01-15-2006 8:52 PM]
ikind of focused on channing today. He needs tomove his feet better on defense. He's like a statue, thats why Bosh was spinning off him like he was standing still. If he doesnt move his feet more, hes going to continue to be picked on and accumulate fouls. one problem that is not talked about is that our BIGS are not good defenders. when you have a poor first line of defense and a poor second line, well the oher team is going toscore a lot.
when lee was inserted into the SL--three things happened--#1we increased our rebounding[which is a facet of defense[not allowing 2nd shots] lee nate and davis also are the group of tougher guys on the club.
#2 it created a way for us to OUTSCORE teams with our second unit. if we can play to a standstill with unit 1, we lead the league with points off the bench--so do a little math--we should win some games that way.
#3 it stopped the wild fluctuations and took guys out who were detrimental to the squad.
the formula should work a bit until teams figure it out, we will come back to earth here a bit. like we both said, we have a lot of needs
im not going to say this move is great this move scks, but i will say one fish that we REALLY REALLY couldve used ws G Wallace. If he was on the team, wed be close to .500