Posted by Marv:
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by DarkKnicks:
Woods or Ariza are better (and they are young) at the 3 than Lee. If we want to play Lee, make him Frye's back up and that's it, almost 20 minutes per night. I don't know why Crawford isn't our starting SG since Q is doing so bad. I'm happy we play the young kids but playing but Nate at the 2 and Lee at the 3 is doing things not the most logical way. Oh well, nevermind, we will lose anyway.
Im still of the opinion that Larry Brown knows alot more about who's better at what position than we do, also I can see the rotation being shortened too, a couple of things were revealed against the bucks, namely that Lee is a capable 3, and that JJ, and rose shouldnt get minutes.
Hey I love Lee and i'm excited abouit his future but right now I don't call him a capable 3. Especially on a team that needs scoring from that spot. He's got the rebounding down pat for a 3 and he's unseleish and heady but where's the handle, outside shooting, ablility to create baskets for yourself, etc?
Well I guess you dont have to be a HOF coach to realize that those are valid points, but I think david lee's offense is coming along. There was a game where he hit two jumpshots in a row(I know that isnt a whole lot but its something), I think he just needs to be more confident with his J, becuase in the most recent milwaukee game, he simply didnt look to score, but he does have a pretty good jumpshot, in fact its probably better than arizas already, thats why Im not opposed to lee at the 3, also qwood gets beaten off the dribble too easily.
[Edited by - slimpack on 01-02-2006 11:50 AM]